Getting to know all about Samuel Alito

Yesterday, a Washington Times report highlighted Samuel Alito’s staunch opposition to abortion rights, among other things, in a 1985 application to become deputy assistant to Attorney General Ed Meese. By late afternoon, even more documents were released about Alito that help shed more light on the ideology of the man Bush wants to see on the Supreme Court.

There’s a lot to chew on, but the New York Times reported on some pretty serious big-picture beliefs that go beyond opposition to abortion rights.

[Alito] singled out that court’s decisions in matters of criminal procedure, the separation of church and state, and the reapportionment of state voting districts to ensure minority groups were equally represented.

And then there were also some smaller details that some in the Senate might find interesting.

He wrote that he was also a member of Concerned Alumni of Princeton. Formed in 1972 to oppose the admission of women to the university, the group moved on to criticize the school’s minority admissions, permissive social norms, and religious nondenominational [services] while supporting the selective admission’s policies of private student clubs affiliated with the school.

Yes, Bush’s choice to succeed Sandra Day O’Connor on the Supreme Court was a member of a group that was created to keep women out of Princeton.

As Sen. Arlen Specter said yesterday, “The plot thickens every day.”

The plot sickens all right.

“samuel alito” is an anagram for “i’m a sellout”

  • It’s a good thing Sen. Spector was nice enough to schedule the hearings far enough out that all this discovery can drip, drip, drip into the news cycle. Raising doubts on many fronts as we meander along towards the hearings.

  • Let me see if I understand. Alito took a position 20 years ago that he no longer believes. Is that because the constitution has evolved or Alito has evolved. Either the Constitution is a living document or Alito’s view of the
    Constitution is evolving. In either respect he does not meet the defintiton of one who believes in “original intent.” Or perhaps he is just a liar.

    Too bad he will still be confirmed!

  • I actually think the reapportionment issue is the worst of all of them, because it was significantly undermining citizens’ ability to achieve change through the ballot. My guess would be that someone who thinks that the court was being overly activist in Baker v. Carr would also think that the court was overly activist in Brown v. Board of Education.

    We always have people complaining about how Roe is a terrible decision as a matter of constitutional reasoning, but I think Brown is as bad, and probably worse. The point, however, is that the alternative is much worse.

  • This is too tragic. I’ve read some of the letters and comments of those folks who did not want women admitted to Princeton and similar elite schools. That was a vicious, divisive period but the women and minorities who came out of the early years of more open admissions are by and large *extremely* successful. That should provide another contrast to GWB who got into Yale at a time when family connection mattered *even more*. Apparently, Alito knew none other than Judge Andrew Napolitano, Fox legal commentator, who was at Princeton around the same time. I wonder if they were part of the same exclusionary group.

  • Comments are closed.