Gingrich ‘sought God’s forgiveness’

If we’re willing to concede that the GOP’s far-right base isn’t altogether pleased with the leading Republican presidential candidates, then it stands to reason that other competitors are going to work hard to fill that void.

Could Newt Gingrich fit the bill? It seems unlikely, given his background (serial adulterer, largely secular background, inattention to the religious right’s agenda as Speaker), but he’s apparently making an effort.

Is Newt Gingrich having a Jimmy Swaggart moment? On Wednesday, Focus on the Family alerted reporters to an interview with Gingrich that will air [today] and Friday on James Dobson’s radio show, in which the former House speaker fesses up to “moral failings.” According to the press release, which is smartly scant on the juicy details so that we’ll have to tune in (or at least Google it), Gingrich tells Dobson that he has “gotten on his knees and sought God’s forgiveness” for his personal failings. Sheesh, sounds like a Kleenex moment, too. […]

It’s probably no coincidence that Newt’s latest book is titled “Rediscovering God In America.” Can Gingrich boost his rep among social conservatives by playing the forgiveness card — and would it work for Rudy? Only time will tell, but shedding a few tears and admitting to bad behavior never hurts.

What’s interesting to me in this case is that Gingrich may not be the only one who’s “sinned,” particularly on the matter of marital fidelity, but he seems to be the only one of the GOP candidates who’s acknowledging his issues.

John McCain left his first wife to marry the woman with whom he was having an affair. Rudy Giuliani was brazen about infidelity, having marched in a St. Patrick’s Day parade with his mistress. Gingrich cheated on his first wife, haggled over the terms of their divorce while she was recovering from uterine cancer surgery, remarried, cheated on her, then remarried again.

McCain doesn’t want to talk about his personal past, Giuliani wants “privacy” over family matters, and Gingrich is chatting with James Dobson about seeking “God’s forgiveness.”

All told, it’s shameless and cynical, but a relatively clever strategy. Newt figures the base hates McCain, disagrees with Giuliani, and is bothered by Romney’s Mormon faith. Huckabee and Brownback are more in line with the Dobson crowd, but they’re burdened by viability concerns.

Gingrich probably realizes his well-documented “character” issues might be a deal-breaker, so what does he do? He goes on Dobson’s radio show, early in the process, concedes “moral failings” and claims to have “gotten on his knees.”

When push comes to shove, Gingrich would be in a position to implicitly say, “There are three admitted adulterers in this race — but I’m the only one who’s said he’s sorry about it.”

What’s more, as Paul Waldman noted:

We all know the stories — served his first wife with divorce papers while she was in the hospital recovering from cancer surgery, had an affair with a young aide (now his third wife) while married to the second wife. But as we know, that stuff doesn’t matter much — what’s more important is whether you can assure conservatives that you’re on the right team when it comes to the culture wars (see Limbaugh, Rush; Bennett, Bill; etc.). And nobody does hippie-bashing with more gusto than Newt.

If Dobson seems satisfied with Gingrich’s mea culpa, it’ll be a trend worth watching.

I’ve said over and over that I expect Gingrich to be the nominee. He’s shrewd and ruthless, and the only one with the real fire to go the distance. Among the base he’s a rock star.

This admittedly cynical move is pretty brilliant politically. He’s not actually in the race yet, he’s watching the front-runners stumble on it, so he inoculates himself now, and jumps in after Labor Day, when it’s time to roll out new products.

It’s looking to me like it’s going to be Gingrich vs. Edwards, which will be worth the popcorn. (Unless Gore gets in, or maybe Clark — Obama and Clinton aren’t going to go the distance, and Edwards is running very, very smart)

  • Good ol’ Newtie – couldn’t get elected as a Rockefeller Republican so he got down on his knees and discovered conservatism. Now he’s down on his knees to become a Taliban mullah.

    Actually, that futhermucking sonofabitch has been “on his knees” every day of his life – to anyone he thought could get him 5 millimeters further up the pole.

    Proof positive you can take the boy out of the trailer park, but you can never take the trailer park out of the boy.

    Trash does indeed float to the top of the cesspool.

  • Purely by accidental channel surfing yesterday, I caught McCain on a Trinity Broadcasting program talking about Jesus and his Christianity in ways I’ve never heard him before. What charlatans.

  • Smart ploy, but the whole electorate is watching. What he gains by sucking up to one group, he loses in other groups who don’t like it.

  • Gingrich can “get on his knees” all he wants, or “bend over” for all I care. He’s a transparent political hack and blowhard who hasn’t had an original thing to say since the Tofflers’ Third Wave crashed. And there’s no intrigue either, ever since he stopped visiting Mary Bono (at least I think he stopped visiting).

    What’s with the morally superior GOPharisees? Can’t they dig up squeaky clean Pat Boone or someone of his ilk? Or even an honest banker, you know the kind that used to run the GOP before St. Ronald the Reagan showed up?

  • If patriotism is the last refuge if the scoundrel does discovering “god” qualify as the next to last? It’s great to know I can act like a pure scumbag all of my life, discover Jesus just before I die, and get away with it all.

  • I think it is wonderful that Newt has reconciled with his god and the American Taliban – they deserve each other. But explain to me how that qualifies him to govern this democracy.

  • Only the wingnuts would be dumb enough to fall for this gag.

    Fortunately they’re not all that stupid, but a lot of them hate us enough to overlook Newt’s penchant for betraying people he made solemn promises to.

  • If, as it has been recently argued, the only real candidate criterion for the True Believers is “Does this candidate really piss liberals off?”, then Newt’s a lead-pipe cinch to get the nomination.

  • Yes Jay, the eleventh hour conversions are legion among politicians running for office. I think if Gingrich wore rosary beads around his neck while prostrate on his stomach and crawling to the altar for forgiveness, that he would not fool enough people to win. I hope he is the republic-thug nominee because it will make the Dem’s job much easier. Remember that he had to resign congress in disgrace during the Clinton impeachment fiasco. That’s quite a bit more than a few parking tickets.

    I’m pretty sure I am not the only one who remembers the real Newt. I know it is quite a lot of time until the next election, but it is hard for me to envision a scenario in which any republican and especially Newt Gingrich will occupy the white house in 2009.

  • Newt when he was speaker was from my district in Georgia. I voted for him in some very close elections. God may forgive him. I never will. I would vote for Hillary over Newt. I don’t like either one.

  • I think if Gingrich wore rosary beads around his neck while prostrate on his stomach and crawling to the altar for forgiveness, that he would not fool enough people to win.

    That’s something I’d like to see. It would thoroughly gross out the Talevangical Base. They believe the front door of every R.C. church leads straight to Satan’s firey maw.

    I don’t know how his contrition might stand up to an election cycle. He’d either have to run a clean campaign (no smearing the opposition, ‘cha right) or every time he makes a peep about morality the opp. can whip out a picture of a woman with cancer. What can he say in response? “But I told God I was sorry!” Fine, the Democratic candidate says “I’m sorry too.” And that leaves…what? “My repentance is bigger than yours!” or maybe they’ll just have to discuss the actual issues facing the country. Oh nooo!

    Maybe I’m missing something but I don’t get why dropping trou for Das Base is still considered a politically savvy move. No one likes them. No one likes anyone they like. After eight years of the last arsehole the Talevans liked I think the slightest association with the rabble will be the kiss of death.

    Don’t get me wrong. I’d like to see every ReThuglican candidate marching arm-in-arm with these social lepers but it never ceases to boggle my mind just how W R O N G they can be.

  • Gingrich who? He still can’t hold a conservative candle to Brownback. When was the last time Newtie boy washed one of his staffers’ feet?
    Its March Madness time, baby, don’t be bringin’ those weak conversion moves. Go strong or don’t go at all.

  • I normally don’t pay attention to this stuff so forgive any errors, but a quick glance at my marital sin-o-meter looks like something is wrong here…

    Righteous Christian Moralists
    Gingrich 3
    Giuliani 3
    McCain 2

    Democratic Secular Infidels
    Clinton 1
    Obama 1
    Edwards 1

    Mormon Polygamist
    Romney 1

  • I suppose the magical question is this. Has Gingrich asked for and received forgiveness from his ex-wives?

    Guiliani clearly hasn’t received forgiveness from his son.

    As for Romney, Mormon’s aren’t polygamists (anymore). Though I understand that two of his greatgrandparents were.

    A lovely crowd, what?

  • It’s my understanding that when Newt got on his knees and begged for forgiveness, God said: “No.”

  • Comments are closed.