If [tag]Rudy Giuliani[/tag] really wants to convince voters that he’s an expert on foreign policy, I’d like to offer the former NYC mayor a helpful tip: pick up a newspaper once in a while.
Giuliani recently told a supportive audience, “It’s something that I think I know, I think I know as well as anybody else who’s running for president, probably better than a lot.” Last week, he went on to argue that he has more knowledge of the world than anyone else running for President.
Fine. Let’s put this boast to the test, shall we?
At a house party in New Hampshire, Mr. Giuliani suggested that it was unclear which was farther along, Iran or North Korea, in the development of a nuclear weapons program.
Now, this one isn’t complicated. If Giuliani were confused about the distinction within North Korea’s nuclear program between enriched uranium and plutonium, I’d understand. The most knowledgeable candidate running should understand the difference, but it’s not exactly common knowledge.
But understanding which nuclear program is farther along, Iran or North Korea, is not limited to the realm of Brookings scholars. Anyone who has even a passing familiarity with current events heard about North Korea restarting its plutonium program and building nuclear weapons. Kim Jung Il even conducted a highly provocative missile test not too long ago. Iran, in contrast, is believed to want weapons, which it doesn’t have. Giuliani flubbed a softball question.
Remember, Giuliani is running on a platform of being a foreign policy expert, particularly on the matter of international security and counter-terrorism. But on this, he doesn’t even understand the basics. It’s like applying for a job at ESPN, claiming to be authority on sports, but not knowing the difference between the Chicago Bears and the Chicago Bulls.
Giuliani is equally confused about al Qaeda.
As for Iran, Mr. Giuliani said that “in the long term,” it might be “more dangerous than Iraq.”
He then casually lumped Iran with Al Qaeda. “Their movement has already displayed more aggressive tendencies by coming here and killing us,” he said.
Mr. Giuliani was asked in an interview to clarify that, inasmuch as Iran had no connection to the Sept. 11 attacks. Further, most of its people are Shiites, whereas Al Qaeda is an organization of Sunnis.
“They have a similar objective,” he replied, “in their anger at the modern world.”
This has all the sophistication of a drunk in a bar. “Sunni, Shiite, whatever. They’re bad.” It’s an impressive expertise, isn’t it?
Giuliani told an audience in Iowa last week that “there are terrorists around the world that are planning to come here and kill us. It is something I understand better than anyone else running for president.”
He “understands” national security the same way Stephen Colbert’s character “understands” the news — he feels the truth. It’s hollow, vacuous, and based on nothing but a public-relations facade, but no matter. Giuliani is an expert, because he says so.
Just don’t ask the guy any questions. His is the kind of expertise that transcends questions.