Giuliani’s grand transformation

Speaking of the Republicans’ top-tier presidential candidates (see below), former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani is — get this — pitching himself as “in sync” with the views of the GOP’s base.

In interviews, several of [Giuliani’s financial backers] said the former mayor had discussed his potential liabilities in a Republican primary — perhaps the greatest being his liberal views on social issues like abortion and gay rights.

“Certainly one of the first questions that was asked was how his views on things like gun control and pro-choice and gay marriage would affect the views of the party in terms of nominating him,” Mr. Immergut said.

“He talked specifically about what his views on those issues were, and he said that his own view was that when he was able to engage in conversations with party members who were more on the right, they could understand that his views were not as black and white as they had been painted.”

Mr. Immergut added, “He said that for many important issues, his views would be right in sync with the huge majority of Republicans.”

To be sure, this isn’t entirely new. [tag]Giuliani[/tag] campaigned a few months ago with Rick Santorum. Asked about the fact that Giuliani and [tag]Santorum[/tag] appear to disagree on practically every social issue in the senator’s book, Giuliani said Santorum had “taken many positions. Most of them I agree with.”

No one, not even the most sycophantic far-right GOP true believer, is gullible enough to believe any of this.

As I mentioned a couple of weeks ago, Giuliani isn’t just burdened by a few isolated issues on which he’s strayed from the conservative line; he’s committed himself to liberal positions on nearly every issue conservative activists care about. He’s not only pro-choice, he’s come out against the ban on so-called “partial-birth” abortion. He’s not only pro-gay, he lived with a gay couple during his mayoral tenure. He’s not only “soft” on conservative’s notion of marriage, he marched in a parade with his mistress.

For that matter, Giuliani was a Democrat for most of his life and endorsed Mario Cuomo’s gubernatorial campaign in 1994 over Republican George Pataki.

In what universe is Giuliani “right in sync with the huge majority of Republicans”?

Greg Sargent noted:

…Rudy’s impending effort to pull off a convincing ideological self-transformation is going to form one of the more interesting storylines to watch as we move into the Presidential race.

I’m very much inclined to agree. If nothing else, Giuliani’s rhetorical acrobatics should be hilarious.

I’ve seen some interesting spin jobs over the years, but this one looks literally impossible. If anyone can explain to me how someone who once famously said, “I’m pro-choice. I’m pro-gay rights,” can now present himself as being on the same page as the GOP base, I’m all ears.

I don’t mind that Rudy would want to be a Repub – that’s his deal. But the fact that he doesn’t have the balls to be himself and be the Republican he wants to be is shameful. But then Republicanism is the great conformity machine: be the way we want you to be or be the enemy. Republicans are stamped out the way Detroit stamps out bumpers where one mindset fits all.

  • “…his views were not as black and white as they had been painted.”

    Not black & white?? Then he’s nothing but a wishy-washy, flip-flopping, fence-sitting, gray-colored opportunist. How is that “in sync” with the GOP as we know and love it??

  • Two posts in a row on the flip-floppers McCain and Giuliani. In reality, both of them are “in sync” with only one thing: their ambition to be president.

    We should be very wary of people like this.

  • I’m confused where you say that Giuliani was ‘a Democrat for most of his life.’ I’ve never heard that. What’s your source?

    But it would be interesting to relive the 1994 endorsement of Cuomo. I remember that clearly, and all the butt kissing that Giuliani had to do to get out of the doghouse post the Pataki win.

  • …for many important issues, his views would be right in sync with the huge majority of Republicans…

    You see the key word there? Maybe Rudy doesn’t think that abortion is an “important” difference?

    Or maybe it’s an accounting issue and the operative word is “many”, which could mean almost anything when you’re a Republican. After all, this is the party that “lowers” deficits by beating inflated projections.

    Or maybe the key phrase is “huge majority of Republicans”. Maybe the “huge majority of Republicans” are actually pro-choice, gay-friendly, NRA bashers, but they’re kept locked in a closet somewhere.

  • My favorite Guiliani story is his administration’s law to prohibit dancing in bars. Part of the clean-up Manhattan campaign. So if you are a person wanting to open a bar, how do you prove that dancing will not be permitted? By “donating” money to someone close to Guiliani to vouch for you. Guiliani was made for the Republican party and can’t wait to get his hands on K Street money.

  • I agree that Giuliani’s flip flops will be a hard sell to GOP primary voters. More importantly, I do not expect his halo with the press to last. Unlike McCain, unfortunately, whose canonization by the MSM seems unshakeable. But regardless of his positions, McCain consistently schmoozes the press. As those in the NY area well know, Giuliani is a prickly, thin-skinned fellow who genuinely resents the press and could give Cheney a good run for governing in secret. My guess is that once the campaign heats up and the press questions Giuliani in a serious way (I’m really waiting for questions on his decision to build his emergency bunker in the already bombed WTC), Rudy’s impatience with the press will quickly rise and a Gore-like relationship would ensue.

  • Giuliani is the ultimate test of “how stupid is the Republican base?”
    If Rove & company stay away from him (I doubt it, if Rove throws in with a competitor), will he sell in the Fundie’s churches?
    Ordinarily, I would say no, a resounding NO! But, remember, these people don’t live in our reality, and who’s to say that their “reality” can’t be shaped to fit Mr.9/11 Hero?

  • “My favorite Guiliani story is his administration’s law to prohibit dancing in bars. Part of the clean-up Manhattan campaign. So if you are a person wanting to open a bar, how do you prove that dancing will not be permitted? By “donating” money to someone close to Guiliani to vouch for you. Guiliani was made for the Republican party and can’t wait to get his hands on K Street money.”

    This law couldn’t have been passed. In New York City? If they tried to pass this law in Toronto one of two things would happen: (a) the people would take up arms, or (b) the population of the city would basically halve over the next three years.

    What the hell is America, a fundamenalist state?

    Oh, wait…

  • Comments are closed.