Giving new meaning to ‘fawning sycophant’

Because Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers has practically zero public record, any documents reflecting her professional background become all the more significant. If senators are to understand her expertise and qualifications for a lifetime position on the nation’s highest court, they’ll have to scrutinize what limited materials are available.

One wonders, then, what the Senate will make of a collection of Miers’ official correspondence from Texas.

Harriet Miers, President Bush’s nominee for the Supreme Court, quickly developed a deep and almost gushing admiration for her boss from her earliest days in Texas government.

“You are the best governor ever — deserving of great respect!” she wrote in 1997, in a belated birthday note that was typical of the tone she used in her correspondence with then-Gov. Bush.

The letter was one of a handful of personal notes included in more than 2,000 pages of documents released Monday by the Texas State Library — most of them routine legal memos, press releases and transcripts. The letters offer a rare glimpse into the mutual admiration that sprung up between Miers and Bush after they began working together on Bush’s first campaign for Texas governor in 1994.

You almost get the impression that they wrote “BFF” in each other’s yearbooks.

Indeed, Miers oozes with deference and awe in her letters to Bush. In a 1995 note, she thanked Bush for a visit and called a ride in a plane with him “Cool!” When she wrote Bush a thank-you note for meeting with a lottery job applicant in 1997, she wrote, “You are the best!”

Likewise, in a 1996 letter thanking Bush and his wife, Laura, for serving as chairs of a Dallas luncheon honoring Miers, the future Supreme Court nominee spoke of a little girl who’d raved about getting Bush’s autograph.

“I truly believe if the governor told her she should be an Astronaut, she would do her best to become one,” Miers wrote. “I was struck by the tremendous impact you have on the children whose lives you touch.”

In other notes, Miers described Bush personally as “cool,” said he and Laura were “the greatest!” and told him that “Texas is blessed” to have him as governor.

We’re venturing into unseen hero-worshipping territory here.

Good. Lord. Hackalicious Toady does not even begin to describe her.

  • Who’s prepared to argue that Miers is ready to be an independent voice on the Supreme Court. Anyone?

  • If “independent” means “will vote the way Bush wants her to every day of the week and twice on Sunday,” sign me up.

  • It almost sounds like the two have had an affair going on for several years. I don’t see how she could ever be impartial. Time to dig up the dirt on these two as they did on Clinton.

  • Given that Mr. Hecht claims to have been her on-again, off-again beau for several years, I can’t believe no one on the Family-Fascist Right has questioned whether she had sex outside of marriage. I mean, that’s like a Class A Sin, right? Does anyone really believe they just went back to her place after dinner for some seriously deep. . . discussion of the Federalist Society?

  • While it is unlikely that Bush would have nominated someone who wrote him notes saying things like “You suck,” it does appear more and more as if George Bush is kind of like Linus (the Peanuts character) with his indispensable security blanket. He simply cannot function in public without his sycophants and cronies around to reassure him that everything is all right.

    Sad excuse for a president.

  • She is the archetypical ‘office wife’ as Maureen Dowd so aptly called the gaggle of gals who fawn and dote on the Preznit, puffing up his ego and making him feel real good about hisself, yessir, real good.

    Somebody hand me a barf bag, I think I’m going to hurl….

  • Each time I read some of her quotes and comments about GWB, I can’t help but think that she is one of the following:

    1. A babbling idiot.

    2. A mindless sycophant.

    3. A single-minded person driven to ride an influential person’s coattails to whatever apogee she can reach.

    Considering she is supposed to be a reasonably sharp lawyer, my suspicions lie with number 3.

    My main question is exactly what would she do once she can cut the tether cord to her free ride?

    Considering some of the other things she has done, I can’t help but wonder if this is what has the right freaking out. We all realize just how good a ‘judge of character’ GW is, just look at some of his other appointments.

    I’m starting to think she hooked up with the eldest (and most gullible) son of a president and decided to put on a show and see how far it would take her. If she ever gets on the Supreme Court, I don’t think she will be beholden to anyone, just herself. The main problem is just what would she do?

  • Given that Mr. Hecht claims to have been her on-again, off-again beau for several years, I can’t believe no one on the Family-Fascist Right has questioned whether she had sex outside of marriage. I mean, that’s like a Class A Sin, right?

    Even worse is to imagine that Miers may be the first virgin on the Supreme Court. What is wrong with a 60-year old virgin? Exceptionally limited life experience that hints at a myriad of psychological problems.

  • Folks let’s act like adults. There is no need to bring speculation on Miers sex life or lack there of into the debate. Have you already forgetten what it was like to be on the recieving end of such speculation in during the Clinton years?

  • I’m doubtful that George knew Harriet in the Biblical sense, if only because Condi would put his privates in a blender if she ever caught him with another woman.

    It’s possible, though, that Harriet’s slavish devotion to George could have come from the fact that she’s very lonely and he waggled his eyebrows at her and gave her his trademark smirk and got her all kind of warm and tingly inside the way that no other man ever could…..in other words, for the first time in her life a man paid real attention to her. Even if nothing physical ever happened, that’s a real hard addiction to break.

    And it would be the most compelling reason to keep her off the bench, imho.

  • Oh, I dunno. If she were appointed to SCOTUS, it might give Thomas something to do while his clerks reworded and retyped Scalia’s draft opinions for his signature….

  • When combined with descriptions of her as having difficulty reaching decisions the image of her picking up the phone to see what George thinks she should do comes to mind.

  • Comments are closed.