When it comes to relentlessly negative campaigning, John McCain is setting a very high bar (or a very low bar, I suppose, depending on one’s perspective). We’ve seen attacks from the McCain gang in July that one might ordinarily expect from a 527 group in October. The low-road campaign has been ugly
, dishonest, and shameful.
And the public has noticed.
By a nearly six-to-one margin, voters say Republican presidential candidate John McCain is running a negative campaign against his Democratic rival, Barack Obama, according to the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll.
Nearly three in 10 voters, 29%, pointed to McCain as the candidate running a negative campaign, compared to just 5% who said Obama is running a negative campaign. McCain’s 29% rating is the highest of any one candidate in the previous two presidential elections according to the WSJ/NBC News survey.
That’s quite a reputation McCain has earned for himself , and in this case, it’s well deserved. To be sure, McCain’s dishonest/negative attacks have had an effect, inasmuch as they’re weakened Obama’s support and increased his negative ratings. But at the same time, McCain’s ugly style of campaigning may have helped convince quite a few Americans that McCain fights dirty.
On the flip side, the Obama campaign has been far more subtle in its approach. It’s not that Obama has refrained from mixing it up, but rather that Obama is taking a harder-hitting message to local audiences, not national ones.
Indeed, some of the harshest advertising Obama has approved has aired exclusively in local markets.
Take this spot, for example, unveiled yesterday, which is running in Atlanta.
For those who can’t watch clips online
, the ad links McCain to Ralph Reed and the Abramoff scandal. It might not work with a national audience, but it’s likely to be pretty effective in Georgia.
This is part of a broader strategy.
Senator Barack Obama has started a sustained and hard-hitting advertising campaign against Senator John McCain in states that will be vital this fall
, painting Mr. McCain in a series of commercials as disconnected from the economic struggles of the middle class.
Mr. Obama has begun the drive with little fanfare, often eschewing the modern campaign technique of unveiling new spots for the news media before they run in an effort to win added (free) attention. Mr. Obama, whose candidacy has been built in part on a promise to transcend traditional politics, is running the negative commercials on local stations even as he runs generally positive spots nationally, during prime-time coverage of the Olympics.
The negative spots reflect the sharper tone Mr. Obama has struck in recent days on the stump as he heads into his party’s nominating convention in Denver next week, and seem to address the anxiety among some Democrats that Mr. Obama has not answered a volley of attacks by Mr. McCain with enough force.
“If you can go quietly negative, that’s what he’s done; I think the perception is that he’s still running the positive campaign,” said Evan Tracey, president of the Campaign Media Analysis Group of TNS Media Intelligence, which monitors political advertising. “It’s a pretty smart, high-low, good cop/bad cop strategy.”
Voters in Ohio hear ads about McCain and the controversial DHL deal. Voters in Nevada see ads about McCain and Yucca Mountain. Voters in the Rust Belt hear about McCain’s support for Bush’s economic policies.
Is all politics local? Obama clearly hopes so.