Going off-message can be dangerous to your career

It doesn’t happen often, but whenever a Bush administration official is quoted anywhere, saying anything that undermines the White House line on important policy matters, many of us stop and think, “That guy just put his job on the line.” After all, administration officials are supposed to be “loyal Bushies,” not objective professionals.

With that in mind, Scott Redd, the director of the National Counterterrorism Center, probably shouldn’t have talked to NBC earlier this week.

The director of the National Counterterrorism Center, the primary US organization responsible for analyzing terror threats, told NBC News that the nation is probably not “tactically” safer from the threat of terrorism following the invasion of Iraq.

Asked by reporter Richard Engel if the war in Iraq had created a “giant recruiting tool” for terrorists, Center head Scott Redd said that “in the short term, that is probably true. But the question is you’ve got to look at this, I believe, in the long term strategic view.”

“Tactically, probably not,” Redd said in response to a question about whether the US is generally safer after having invaded Iraq. “Strategically, we’ll wait and see.”

It was one of those great Michael Kinsley Moments — a public figure making a mistake by accidentally telling the truth. We all know that our ongoing presence in Iraq is helping terrorists recruit more terrorists, and has not made the U.S. safer, but Bush administration officials aren’t supposed to admit it, out loud.

Perhaps it’s not surprising, then, that Redd announced his retirement today. (via TP)

Retired Vice Adm. John Scott Redd said he is stepping down next month to have a long-delayed surgery and spend more time with his five grandchildren and the rest of his family. His spokesman, Carl Kropf, said Redd needs to have both knees replaced. The surgery will require follow-up rehabilitation and would have meant a prolonged absence from the center.

In a note to employees, Redd provided an upbeat assessment of the administration’s fight against terrorism. “I believe that as a country we are better prepared today than at any time in our history to wage this war,” he said Wednesday.

Now, I obviously have no way of knowing if Redd voluntarily ended his decades-long career just a couple of days after going off-message, but coincidences like this one make me laugh.

needs to have both knees replaced

Good gawd, they literally kneecapped him! Horrifying.

  • Either that, or, knowing he was retiring soon, he decided to finally speak the truth.

  • I still have some contacts and freinds in MI in the USArmy. All enlisted. To a man, they have been arguing this same thing since we ‘conquered’ Iraq. One was denied a promotion. Two have seen heavy combat with no decorations of any sort. They supect, but of course cannot prove, that these, and other non-advancements, are related to their belief that America’s presence is creating more terrorists. (Sorry, I will not provide their names).

    The idea that going ‘off-message’ results in bad things has spread to every government agency of which I am aware. The National Park Service funding and fundamentalism to cite one example.

  • “…the question is you’ve got to look at this, I believe, in the long term strategic view.”

    This is exactly what president Bush has been saying all along. And in 5000 years, who’s going to remember that he was the biggest idiot ever elected president?

    You guys really need to learn to look at the big picture, just like the greatest delusional moron visionary ever..

  • Good. Now I don’t have to analyze the ulterior motives of what Bush/Cheney were trying to achieve by having Scott say that. Now I can just chock it up to a momentary instance of honesty.

    On an unrelated note, why did Bush’s AG nominee make such a strong stand against torture? If his nomination isn’t pulled tomorrow, does that mean it’s now safe to assume it’s BS?

  • I wonder if this resignation is tied to the SITE brouhaha when the tape of OBL was prematurely leaked.

  • Redd’s situation is similar to General Pace’s after he said that there may be EFP’s coming from Iran, but there was no proof that the Iranian government itself was involved in shipping the EFP’s to insurgents in Iraq. Time to find a new line of work. There wasn’t much coverage of the fact that EFP’s can be made in Iraq, without involving Iran. An EFP factory was found in Diwaniya in Iraq in April. (12th paragraph) What was the lame excuse for Pace’s replacement, might have a hard time in Congressional approval hearings? $hrub was probably told that since so many sheeple in the US still believe there was a link between Hussein and al Qaeda, they would easily believe that Iran is pursuing nukes, even without any proof. In other words, stick with the old lies. Probably easier for $hrubtard to remember.

  • These accidentally honest politicians have to be stopped.
    Their blunders, hypocrisies and blatant lies create a solid income for many-a satire artist and comedians. If they start to tell the truth, what are we going to call them on?

  • Comments are closed.