GOP ‘does not have a clue’ how it’s alienated Hispanic voters

This comes up from time to time, but Tom Edsall had a good piece today reminding us of the political consequences of the right’s rhetoric in the immigration debate.

Republican opposition to liberalized immigration reform has put at risk the loyalty of a key constituency – evangelical Protestant Hispanics. The loss of this Hispanic support endangers the GOP’s ability to win presidential elections.

In the view of Republican strategists, it is crucial for the party’s candidates to win a substantial share of the Hispanic vote to remain competitive in the Southwest mountain states – Colorado, Arizona, Nevada and New Mexico – and, looking farther ahead, in Florida and Texas.

Key leaders in the rapidly growing Latino evangelical community who had provided strong support to President Bush in 2004 are deeply angered by the opposition among Republicans to immigration legislation now stalled in the Senate.

“The Republican Party does not have a clue just how the perception of them among Hispanics has completely deteriorated in the last few years,” said Marcos Witt, Senior Pastor of the Hispanic congregation at Lakewood Church in Houston and a three-time Latin Grammy winner for his Christian recordings.

And Witt is a conservative Republican who actively supported Bush’s 2004 campaign. He’s been listening to Latino resentment in Texas and concluded that Sens. John Cornyn and Kay Bailey Hutchison, both critics of the compromise bill, “can kiss the Hispanic vote goodbye.”

Now, in most instances, that may not matter. Indeed, for many conservative Republicans, the bigger danger is embracing the Bush/Kennedy/McCain compromise legislation and getting challenged from the right.

But nationally, and with a long-term view, the GOP is going out of its way to alienate the fastest growing segment of the U.S. population. Politically, this is probably more unwise than they realize.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Hispanics accounted for nearly half of the 2.8 million people added to the U.S. population in 2004 and 2005. People of Hispanic origin now make up 15% of the U.S. population, about 43 million people. Nearly half of the nation’s children under 5 are racial or ethnic minorities, and the percentage is increasing mainly because of rapid growth in the Hispanic population.

Bush made substantial gains among Hispanic voters between 2000 and 2004, but discontent with the GOP has blossomed since.

[Reverend Luis Cortes, Jr., a 2004 Bush supporter], president and CEO of Philadelphia-based Esperanza USA, the largest Hispanic faith-based community-development corporation in the country, is now outspoken in his criticism of the GOP.

“Evangelical Hispanic voters have to lay the brunt of the blame on the members of the Republican Party” for the Senate’s failure to provide a path to legal status for illegal immigrants, Cortes told Huffington Post. A conservative on abortion and gay marriage, Cortes said that those issues are now trumped by his concern with family preservation and reunification provisions, which are threatened by new immigration measures proposed by the GOP.

“Family is our number one value, after loving God. Our family comes first. We must elect people who are for our families and for immigration reform. That is how we would begin to organize our people for every House and Senate election,” Cortes said.

Florida Senator Mel Martinez, who is also chairman of the Republican National Committee, warned, “I believe that not to play this card right would be the destruction of our party.”

You and Edsall might be right. And, in any case the Dem leadership is much better at this than the GOP: they’re more than willing to put the interests of racial demagogues ahead of the national interest. Why, some Dem leaders (and leftwing NGOs like the ACLU and the SPLC) even have direct or indirect links to those linked to the MexicanGovernment! The GOP can’t beat them at that.

  • And, in any case the Dem leadership is much better at this than the GOP: they’re more than willing to put the interests of racial demagogues ahead of the national interest.

    Yet another episode of “Saying it with authority makes it so!”

    Sorry, visitor: the David Dukes, George Allens and Trent Lotts of this world tell a different story. So do the changing demographics in America. Martinez has it right – “playing this card” wrong has and will cost the Republican party dearly.

    Karma.

    -GFO

  • The experience of the GOP in California after Gov. Pete Wilson’s Proposition 187 might be repeated nationally, with the emphasis on the states you mentioned. Prop 187 helped Wilson get re-elected, but — other than Arnold Schwarzenegger — at the cost of the party losing every top-line state election (president, governor, US senator) since.

  • Allowing 12 millions illegal aliens Hispanics to gain citizenship quickly and start voting automatically for Democrats will eliminate the Republicans faster than alienating the few Hispanic who vote for the Republican now.

    The Democrats are all supporting open borders and amnesty because passing the immigration reform bill will eliminate the Republican party from relevence before the 2016 presidential elections.

  • #3: You might want to read this. Those pushing that same line generally do so in order to support MassiveImmigration of any kind for the agendas of those who pay them, so you might want to try to find out who put such ideas in your head in the first place.

    On a related note, current L.A. mayor TonyVillar – a Democrat and a progressive – congratulated Mexico’s president on helping block Prop187, which passed with 59% of the vote (it also had a majority of Hispanic support two months before the vote). Later, he had Mexico’s president address the CA Assembly and lead them in the Chicano power handclap (tinyurl.com/yshukz).

    And, while I hate to keep dragging this even further afield, progressives and/or Dems might want to see this video of the current Speaker of the CA Assembly. He mills around during the U.S. National Anthem, but snaps to attention and salutes when another country’s anthem plays: youtube.com/watch?v=FgbCB8QlQWw

    Despite that performance, he’s now one of Hillary’s co-chairs.

    And, here’s Howard Dean paying a visit to one of his county chairs who had previously allowed a racist group to promote violence at a Dem meeting: tinyurl.com/29o4rg

    Patriotic Dems might want to take a closer look at those in their party and what they really support.

  • #5

    And what country did you or your ancestors emigrate from? How long ago?
    .
    .
    .
    For the record, I was born in the UK.

  • It’s kind of amazing that the one time Bush pushes for something that’s trying to make things better for the country overall (instead of just for das base), crap blows up everywhere. Makes one wonder who thought this could be his legacy domestic achievement.

    Not that I’m convinced that the proposal will succeed in improving things, just that it’s out of character that it’s a legitimate attempt at bipartisan compromise.

    Also, did someone say the Democrats kowtow to interests of demagogues more than the GOP? Bwahahaha!

  • Let’s see, used to be that the Dems were out for the welfare queen votes. Then it was that Dems were supporting America’s enemies and the terrorists. Now, the trolls have decided that the Dems are for the racist vote. Be very, very afraid of the “other”. The neocon rethugs are always falsely accusing others of what they themselves are. They are the ones who pursued the policy of the rule of the rich white males and the U.S. is #1 and nothing else matters, well except their corporatist pimps. Sorry trolls, you’ll have to tell KKKarl it isn’t going to work.

  • The thing is… So, suppose that the conservative Hispanics are disenchanted with GOP. What will the results be? Do they switch to Dem side? I doubt it, because the religion-driven issues (abortion, gays) may not be of *primary* importance, but not far off. Do they just stay home and not vote? Maybe. Do they swallow their bile and go vote for the GOP anyway, hoping that the next time around they’ll have more say? Also maybe.

  • I think it’s a telling barometer of the average “conservative” mindset to gauge just how many from the “other side of the isle” make an appearance on an immigration thread.

    Having grown up in the South, I always thought that beneath all the “state’s rights”, “family values”, “government off our backs”, & “personal responsibility” rhetoric spouted by the typical “conservative” existed a core of systemic xenophobia.

    I’m still trying to figure out what all the fuss is about. I live in Nevada, deal with Mexican immigrants (probably legal and illegal) on a daily basis. I simply don’t have a problem with them, except maybe that they work a hell of a lot harder than me and make me feel a little guilty for making 10 times the money that they do.

    Here’s my little “leftist” talking point: send me an honest, friendly, hard-working Mexican and for each one, I will send a spoiled, self-righteous, ignorant racist in his place to live with the drug cartels in Mexico.

    Talk about the end of the Republican party as we know it! A guy can dream, can’t he?

  • Telling patriotic Democrats that they can destroy the fever swamp of bigotry and thuggery that is the Republican party by providing a pathway to citizenship for 12 million people (i.e., by doing the right thing) is probably not the best way to get them to reconsider …

  • “Key leaders in the rapidly growing Latino evangelical community who had provided strong support to President Bush in 2004 are deeply angered by the opposition among Republicans to immigration legislation now stalled in the Senate.”

    let’s just hope they remember this the next time they vote.

  • Democrats should play this RIGHT rather than easy.

    Crush employers of illegal immigrants.
    When the labor pool gets badly squeezed, the LEGAL immigration quotas can be raised to practical levels.

    Republicans want Latinos who can’t vote, can’t get legal protection, and can’t unionize. Troublemakers can be threatened with deportation.

    Democrats need not support the oppression of labor to support Latino immigration. I think it’s a long term mistake to do so just for short term political gain. We should want to make more American workers, not borrow Mexican ones. The Democrats can be the ones with open arms and a level head is this is done right.

  • Comments are closed.