GOP doesn’t respond well to Craig’s reversal

So, Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho) announced yesterday that we should forget all that stuff he said about resigning as of Sept. 30, and all that other stuff he said about stepping down if he’s unable to change his misdemeanor guilty plea in Minnesota. He’s decided to stick around for the next 15 months or so.

Craig’s Republican colleagues, of course, threw him under the bus two months ago, and thought they were rid of him. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ken.) had described Craig’s conduct as “unforgivable,” which tends to be a conversation-ender. How’d they take yesterday’s announcement? Not well.

National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman John Ensign (Nev.) on Thursday called for Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho) to honor his original resignation speech and his personal commitment to Republicans that he would resign if the judge did not vitiate his guilty plea.

“He gave us his word that he would resign…. I’m calling on Sen. Craig to keep his word,” said Ensign. “If he loves his party, and he loves the Senate, the honorable thing to do is to resign.”

I think political professionals call this the “pretty please” approach. I don’t think Craig’s going for it.

Obviously, the NRSC’s Ensign wasn’t alone. “You don’t want to know what I really feel,” said Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.). “He ought to keep his word,” said Tom Coburn (R-Okla.).

At least they still have the looming Ethics Committee investigation, right? I wouldn’t count on it.

We talked yesterday about the ways in which the Senate GOP will lean on Craig using an ethics probe to possibly force his resignation. By making the hearings and investigation public, Craig’s conduct will be open to intense scrutiny, played out in front of the national spotlight.

Except, a TPM reader makes a compelling case that the Idaho Republican may have reason to believe the Senate GOP leadership may be bluffing.

The genius of Craig’s move today is in calling the Republicans’ bluff on Ethics Committee hearings: Does the Republican leadership really want televised hearings on gay sex in public, involving one of their own, as the AP is reporting is “virtually certain”? Didn’t think so. Who’s taking odds that those hearings are cancelled somehow, some way?

That’s a good point. Craig clearly has a lot to lose in terms of dignity, but his reputation is already in the (ahem) toilet, and he’s not running for re-election anyway. Senate Republicans, who want this scandal to go away as swiftly as possible, are going to turn the matter into a public spectacle? Within a year of an election?

I don’t think so.

Larry Craig got caught hitting on an undercover cop in an airport men’s room, lying about it, and pleading guilty to a criminal charge. And he’s going to stay in the Senate, even after vowing to resign. That’s pretty impressive.

I doubt that Craig’s remaining in the Senate will have much effect on Republican’s electoral fortunes. It is ironic, though, to see Republicans use the phrase “keep his word.” It’s also a surprise that any Republican Senator use the word “honorable” without having it turn to ashes in his mouth.

  • Is it petty of me to admit to experiencing more than just a little schadenfreude in this whole situation (not for Craig personnaly but for the GOP generally)?

  • Isn’t that how the Republican Party operates?

    When Bush said that he wanted to get to the bottom of it in regards to leaking Plame’s identity, he was going to fire whoever was involved in it. —-> A few people in the White House were involved, and the tune changed to: when someone is found to have committed a crime…. —> Then it became when someone is found guilty of a crime —-> Then when found guilty, you offer a pardon. In between the act of committing the crime, and the time of a jury verdict, many years go by and, most people are becoming a little fuzzy about what actually happened.

    So…. Here we are with Craig; another Republican making his own reality, regardless of what anybody else says. It worked for Tom Delay, why wouldn’t it work for Craig? The Republicans are only about trying to preserve the little bit of power they have left, and stalling is one of those time honored techniques. Nye stayed in his post as well, until well after the jury had found him guilty and the verdict was in.

    Look at CREW’s list to see all the Republicans under a cloud of suspicion… I’m not saying what Craig did is alright, but considering there are well over 20 republicans under investigation, they only pick on the one Senator involved in what they perceive as ‘gay sex behavior’. (The reason of using the ‘perceived’ is because apparently there are quite a few heterosexual men who engage in that behavior as well.)

    Here is one more example in how the current Republican Party acts like any other Right Wing regime. Ahmedinejad comes to mind. He officially said that there are no gays in Iran. Well… Officially, In the Republican Party are no gays either, at least not as long as you remove the Senator who engages in it.

  • I’d say there’s a good chance that Craig also knows who the other closeted gay Republicans are, and that the GOP probably doesn’t want him getting into that.

    But I see a way to parlay this sordid episode into the greater narrative… if the Republicans are so interested in making people keep their promises, there’s a nice list of promises that Mr Bush made that still haven’t been kept. For a more focused approach, someone could dig up the broken promises made by all the vulnerable Republicans running in 2008, and put them in the context of the Larry Craig fiasco.

    The ad:

    Republicans.
    (picture of Craig and Republican X)
    Breaking promises is what we do.

  • Wow, Larry’s using thermonuclear weapons for his scorched earth tactics. Good for him. Perhaps it is time to update Willie S’ quote about scorned. “Hell has no fury like a woman or gay-but-claims-he’s-not-gay-Repub scorned.

    ““He ought to keep his word,” said Tom Coburn (R-Okla.)”
    Heh, honor among pols? Like virtue among whores, right Vitter?

    New rule from the NRSC: It’s okay if you’re a Straight (allegedly) Repub (IOKYASR.)

  • On one hand, I’m happy to keep him around… he’s the perfect poster child for the Party – he has no sense of shame, and he’s a national joke. (And regardless of his stupidity, his supposed “crime” is pretty slight) On the other hand, he still brings his repellent viewpoint to the senate and draws a bigger paycheck for it than I do.

  • Craig has reversed himself several times already on this, I don;t see why anyone should be certain that he will not run for reelection. A simple statement that “The people of my state know me and believe in my innocence. They have asked me to continue serving them, therefore I am announcing my intent to run for reelection.”

    Go for it, Larry! It would be worth it just so that we can listen for the double thud as Sens. McConnell and Ensign hit the floor, victims of simultaneous coronaries.

  • Keep Craig.

    Same reason I liked Clarence Thomas.
    It’s not like Idaho is going to send us someone GOOD. (Not until Dean gets some Democratic machinery up to snuff there and starts building a bench.)

    Will he be willing to join the Log Cabin Republicans now?
    Might he be able to get some serious campaign coin that way?

    Who wouldn’t love to see a gay rights Republican once Craig shakes his pointless self-loathing?

    A boy can dream.

  • typical, totally self-centered repub. male…gay or not he is just as mean-spirited and vindictive as the rest of them

  • It bugs me that Democrats aren’t speaking up about the Republican Applause that is given to ho-mongers who break the law. I’m speaking of that fornicating adulterer, Sen. Vitter.

    These republicans and their perverted sins.

    Hebrews 13:4 (King James Version)

    “Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.”

  • Senator Craig should be applauded, praised, given a bonus (in whichever coin of the realm he chooses) for being the new POSTER CHILD FOR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.

    HOW COULD HE MORE EMULATE HIS LOVED LEADERS GEORGE & DICKIE?

  • Comments are closed.