GOP hopefuls scramble to kiss the religious right’s ring

In the 1990s, the Christian Coalition would hold an annual event, called the “Road to Victory,” every October. Officially a “non-partisan” event hosted by a tax-exempt non-profit, the gatherings featured thousands of right-wing, vaguely-theocratic activists who came from across the country, expecting Republican officials and candidates to pledge their allegiance to the religious right’s cause.

The Christian Coalition, of course, collapsed a few years ago, but the annual tradition begins anew today. This time, it’s the Family Research Council, an offshoot of James Dobson’s Focus on the Family empire, hosting an event it calls the Values Voter Summit. And just as Republican presidential hopefuls used to beg for votes at Road to Victory, every single GOP candidate will be on hand in DC for this nutty gathering.

For months, Republican presidential candidates such as Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee and John McCain have courted evangelical Christians, meeting with religious leaders throughout the Midwest and the South.

Today, thousands of Christian conservatives will gather in Washington to confront the fact that none of the candidates has won them over.

For Romney, a former Massachusetts governor, and former senator Fred D. Thompson (Tenn.), the conference will be an opportunity to do what months of private meetings have failed to accomplish: become the consensus candidate for the evangelical movement, a key constituency of the Republican Party.

Chuck Colson, Watergate felon turned evangelical leader, told the WaPo, “At the moment, there’s nothing but confusion every place I go. They lament the fact that there’s no one candidate out there around whom evangelicals and conservative Catholics can sort of coalesce around and get excited about.” He added, “Nobody has rung the bell yet.”

The entire field, sans Sam Brownback, will be giving it their best shot, going to great lengths to show that they are just as unhinged and hostile to church-state separation as the 2,000 people in attendance.

A few things to watch for:

* Will Rudy Giuliani get booed? It’s unlikely — expect him to devote 95% of his speech to attacking Hillary Clinton.

* Will Mike Huckabee convince the religious right that he’s credible? As a Baptist minister, he’s got the chops, but it’s a politically savvy bunch. These guys value electability, and they know Huckabee doesn’t have any money.

* What will Ron Paul say? He’s the one GOP candidate who has made very little effort to endear himself to the religious right, in part because their agenda requires huge government interference with Americans’ lives, and Paul’s a libertarian. I’m curious about his pitch.

* Will any candidate try to Sister Souljah the religious right, the way John McCain did in 2000? Don’t count on it.

* Can Mitt Romney seal the deal? He’s been slowly picking up religious right endorsements over the last couple of weeks, as the movement sees him as the credible anti-Giuliani. But what can he say to completely win them over?

On that last point, we have some idea what to expect.

Mitt Romney plans to promise on Friday that as president he would convene a White House summit on ways to “strengthen the family, particularly in the inner city,” according to remarks released by his campaign.

That pledge bolsters Romney’s longtime vow that he and his wife, Ann, would make the reduction of out-of-wedlock births a focus of his administration. The agenda reflects an effort to tap into the changing priorities of religious conservatives. A CBS News poll of evangelicals released Thursday night found they were more concerned about poverty than abortion.

“It’s time to make out-of-wedlock births out-of-fashion again,” Romney’s text says.

Lovely.

Also note, there will be a Values Voter Summit straw poll at the end of the weekend, and some of the same leaders who last month explored a third-party option will meet again privately at this event.

Stay tuned.

If Rudy devotes 95% of his speech to bashing Hillary does that leave any room for 9/11?

  • “Or a cell call from Judi?”

    nah, he said he wasn’t gonna do that any more. and we all believe everything roodie says, don’t we 🙂

  • Ron Paul knows the religious right wants big government to force their ideals down everyone’s throat. That is just as bad as the liberals’ who want to shove their agenda down everyone’s throat.

    If the anti-abortion movement would wake up, they would realize that if you stick to the constitution, roe v. wade will be overturned, and die a slow death in most states. They should vote for Ron Paul. And if you’re antiwar, how can you be pro-choice? Isn’t being antiwar the same as protecting life across the board. Without life, there can be no liberty.

  • You can’t pursue happiness if your parents decided to kill you. Just like my desire to pursue happiness doesn’t allow me to hurt someone else’s happiness

  • I find myself chomping at the bit about the FRC tax status and that of several other “religious” organizations.

    The Family Research Council tax certainly lobbies for their agenda: http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?c=LEGISLATION

    Their tax-exempt status is unconstitutional. A reminder from the IRS website:

    To be tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be organized and operated exclusively for purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3), and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates.

    http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=96099,00.html

    The FRC Federal Tax Status is an exemption under 501C3.

    Additionally, the people running that show seem to have mind-blips, swerves and hiccups. I was struck by this statement on their website:

    When it is discovered that a homosexual escort service has been run out of a Congressman’s house – then that Congressman should resign. Or when an elected official tries to (and in some cases succeeds) have sexual relations with a young page or intern – then that politician should resign. When a Senator pleads guilty to a charge related to soliciting sex in a public restroom – they should resign and not submit Congress or their fine state to any further embarrassment. Additionally if a Senator conducts an Appropriations Committee hearing and allows, even encourages, the audience to heckle a respected U.S. General – perhaps it is time to end an already too long political career.

    http://www.frcblog.com/

    They’ve thrown the kitchen sink into their resignation wish-list. Yet they didn’t include a wish for GW Bush’s resignation for allowing the gay prostitute, Jeff Gannon, to have free access to the WH and press conferences. And in the statement above, in midstream they switch from wishing for the resignation of those who’ve committed sexual misdemeanors to someone not “respecting” a respectable U.S. General.

    Ronald Reagan got the Republican ball rolling toward the religious right when he cozied up to the Southern Baptist Convention, and the religious right has since then broken the wall of separation between church and state.

  • How can the religious right not favor Ron Paul? The guy stands on principle. He recently celebrated his 50-year wedding anniversary. He studied to be a minister. He’s pro-life and delivered over 4,000 babies in his career as a doctor. His brother is a minister.

    How much more religious street cred can you get???

  • Mark asks: How much more religious street cred can you get???

    “Religious street cred?” The only politician with religious street cred is Pete Stark.

  • I wonder why they don’t call for elimination of the Establishment Clause in the Bill of Rights. Maybe because most Americans don’t seem to know it exists?

  • Comments are closed.