GOP picks a villain: Harry Reid

For years, Republicans have seemed off-balance and directionless unless they have a specific American whom they could direct their rage. If they’re not turning a rival into a villain, they’re probably just trying to narrow down their enemies’ list.

Too many adversaries makes for a muddled message — the GOP needs one person to hate at a time. And as of today, their #1 enemy is Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

Senate Republicans are preparing to take aim at Majority Leader Harry Reid over the August recess for being “all talk but no action” and helping drag the Democrat-led Congress’ approval rating to a historic low, according to a document distributed to caucus members.

Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona, chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, is meeting with members yesterday and today to disseminate a message critical of Democrats for endlessly debating the Iraq war, stalling judicial nominations and squandering time on at least 300 investigations of the Bush administration.

“We really ought to be asking why this Democrat leadership won’t allow Congress to move forward on serious policy debates,” Mr. Kyl said, when asked about the talking-points memorandum he is circulating.

I suppose it’s possible that I’ve heard more breathtaking hypocrisy, but nothing comes to mind. Reid isn’t allowing Congress to move forward? Republicans are on pace to be the most obstructionist minority in the history of Congress, and the GOP wants to blame Reid for blocking progress?

I suppose we should have seen this coming. Fred Hiatt went after Reid over the weekend, at the same time as David Brooks, Bob Novak, and a handful of other conservative media voices, suggesting some kind of coordinated effort to blast the Majority Leader.

And now the RNC is making it official.

I obtained, this afternoon, a copy of the new RNC talking points — which, I kid you not, devote a whole section to David Broder’s criticism of Reid — which were surprisingly weak.

On Sunday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) called President Bush “a liar” and a “part of the culture of corruption.” This is not the first time Sen. Reid has engaged in such over-the-top rhetoric and attacks. Sen. Reid once called the President a “loser” in front of teenagers during a civics discussion in a high school. He still stands by his claim that Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan was “the biggest political hack in Washington.” […]

Given the dismal state of Congress under the Democrats’ leadership, Sen. Reid’s choice of words is unfortunate, but not unexpected. Public confidence in Congress has plummeted to an all-time low of 14 percent. Instead of working to advance the country, Sen. Reid chooses to engage in partisan attacks and reckless rhetoric. It’s no surprise that The Washington Post’s David Broder called Sen. Reid an “embarrassment to the Democrats.”

I find it hard to believe anyone is going to find this attack compelling. Indeed, by RNC standards, it’s pretty tame stuff. There wasn’t anything specifically libelous in the whole thing, just a bunch of examples of Reid being mean to conservatives. If the RNC’s oppo file on Reid is this thin, he must be doing a pretty good job running the Senate.

For what it’s worth, the Caucus released a list of Democratic accomplishments from the first six months of the 110th Congress, and it’s fairly impressive.

Less than six months into the 110th Congress, Senate Democrats have made significant strides in passing important, common-sense legislation that reflect the priorities of the American people. After nearly a decade of Republican control, Democrats have worked to restore fiscal responsibility in Washington and pass key legislation on Iraq policy, homeland security, troop readiness, veterans’ health care, economic competitiveness, ethics reform, the minimum wage, health care, education, energy independence, stem cell research, and Gulf Coast revitalization.

Note to Republicans: you need a new boogeyman.

The GOP sets the frame, and their strategy is clearly a repeat of 1994: filibuster and block anything, no matter what the merits, and join hands with the media in blaming Democrats for their obstructionism.

Which is why they hate Reid. He makes them obstruct popular stuff, which makes Republicans look bad, even if their lapdog press refuses to use the “f” word. Dems want to bring them home; Republicans want to stay.

Spin that, baby!!!

  • the republicans must be getting really worried to direct all their venom at reid. ever notice the ones they make out to be villains are usually the ones doing the best job at making the republican’s life difficult?

  • For years, Republicans seem off-balance and directionless unless they have a specific American at which they can direct their rage

    For a generation, this had been Ted Kennedy’s job.

    It’s like the passing of an era….

  • I’d really like to see the Dem candidates battling for Reid and the Dem Congress. They are in a unique position to get coverage from the press. They need to use their “we’re in it together” attitude to start with their party.

  • Am I a contrarian to smile at this? I like it, because I think Senator Reid will kick their little pissy-pants into the next election, where more than a few of those vunerable Repubs will be retired.
    He’s a fighter, and except for an occasional misstep, he’s giving the Repubs tittie twisters right and left. I would have said busting their balls, except these Republican weasels have been castrated by Rove, with the operations financed by Grover Norquist.
    I’m sure that the Repub Senators will appreciate multiple 30 consecutive hour filibusters. I think after the 4th or 5th the Dems will have the bumpersticker talking point down. Then (I hope) even the MSM will not muddle the message.

  • You think Reid is a boogeyman, if Hillary’s the nominee it’ll be nonstop wingnuttery on parade.

    The best lunacy is yet to come. When the Republicans see the tsunami of 2008 barreling down on them they will really get ridiculous. So far das base has kept them from jumping off the decks of the USS BushCo, and even if they did jump they know they still won’t be safe from the angry Americans who can’t wait to vote their asses into oblivion.

    Assuming we have an election. 🙂

  • There are no easy targets out there anymore for the Wurlitzer. I’m not as sure in Pelosi fighting back as I am in Reid, Sen. Clinton, Obama, Edwards, and Schumer. (I’ve been waiting for years for them to come after Chuck–he’s liberal, Jewish, and a New Yorker. Their anxiety from Central Casting.) But maybe they think she’s too sympathetic as a high-achieving woman to slime with their usual energy.

  • I wasn’t particularly impressed with Rahm this morning on MSNBC when he was “debating” Adam Putman. Putman was toting the Administration’s line – word-for-word – about the Democratic Congress (at least he didn’t say “democrat congress”!) and how it’s not doing anything.

    I really expected Rahm to go into full “Republican-obstructionist” mode and blow Putman out of the water, but he didn’t. Missed opportunity to tell the country that it ain’t US who’s holding back on war ending votes.

  • “Fred Hiatt went after Reid over the weekend, at the same time as David Brooks, Bob Novak, and a handful of other conservative media voices, suggesting some kind of coordinated effort to blast the Majority Leader.”

    when i was a kid (a long, long time ago), my 2nd grade class went to a turkey farm sometime before thanksgiving. we were all amazed that when one turkey went “gobblegobblegobble,” the whole flock went “gobblegobblegobble.”

    of course, we all know what happens to turkeys in november.

  • You think Reid is a boogeyman, if Hillary’s the nominee it’ll be nonstop wingnuttery on parade.

    You know what? In a weird way, I’m hoping they do. I think a Hillary campaign is where the FOX media dynamic jumps the shark. People are already catching on despite the media’s best efforts to confuse them, and they must be becoming aware of the cognitive dissonance between what they see on cable and the reality that can no longer be denied. Wait until they up it a notch back to the 90’s absurdity — and this time, we have some infrastructure like MediaMatters in place for some push-back that we didn’t have during the never-ending underwear sniffing of the 90s. A lot of people are onto them.

    The most investigated President in history had one person in his 8 years who got anything close to a conviction, and that was Cisneros for lying about how much he was blackmailed for by his mistress. Bush has been the least investigated administration in history, and they’re dropping like flies.

    Just as Bush’s ABC policy vindicated Clinton’s reality-based wonkery, a showdown with the MSM could expose the tabloid largess we were aware of since the rise of Drudge and Gingrich.

  • Reid is 10X better than anyone the repubs have in the Senate. The senate would have an outstanding bipartisan record if the republican obstructionists would stop blocking legislation from even being allowed to be voted on by senate members.

    Republicans in the Senate are guilty of sabotaging legislative efforts and are finding it difficult to blame it on others. Their tactics are just to obvious to avoid blame.
    Notice that the RNC memo is not about how to make government better or how to better govern but merely who they should try to blame for their own failures as a way to justify their disruptive actions. Just pathetic. It seems a government that functions well does so because it’s members refuse to obstruct it and allow it to function. Senate republicans are not allowing it to even function.

  • Bush and Cheney and Rove must just love this. I think whether anyone finds the talking points compelling, CB, misses the point. They are sitting in glee as another news cycle deals with who said what about whom;

    did Harry get dissed?;

    who’s more obstructionist?;

    who’s more partisan?;

    do you think that Congress should all just get along?

    Rahm Emanuel and every single Dem who goes on the air should answer any question with the following:

    “Your question is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is the fact that the Republicans refuse to bring home our troops. Harry Reid is trying to bring them home and the Republicans won’t … let … them.”

  • “You think Reid is a boogeyman, if Hillary’s the nominee it’ll be nonstop wingnuttery on parade.” — Racerx

    I think that’s exactly what they’re waiting for — her negatives are so high already I think they’re just biding time figuring that she’s the Dem they can beat by hitting on those negatives. I also think most of the slime will come not from candidates but from 3rd parties — pundits, talk-radio, and new issue advocacy groups we haven’t even heard of yet.

    Clinton (or whoever gets the nod) ought to steal a page from Rove and attack their strength — by preemptively exposing the kind of slimeball tactics the country should expect — and that speech ought to be during the convention. Having been warned, some voters might be less inclined to believe the attacks when they start. Playing catch up or ignoring them is a loser’s game. Ask Kerry. Or Gore.

  • This is going to be a hard sell by the Republicans to all but any of the same voters who have always bought into their Siren Song, but at this point it’s their only hope with their Party stuck with such a severe deficit of members with integrity but such a large surplus of demagogues. Drowining men will cling together as their boat sinks beneath them.

  • I only wish Reid would get on the bandwagon with the American people and advocate impeachment of Bush/Cheney. Saying they are the worst leaders in our history won’t restore the balance of power in our three branches of government. Without impeachment, the next president will also have too much power, and we need to save our republic. Otherwise, our freedom will truly be gone forever.

  • Reid is the obstructionist?

    It was only last week that the beloved GOP talking point “up or down vote” was officially declared dead. Its demise was little noticed in the aftermath of the Senate Republicans’ successful all-night filibuster to block the Reed-Levin bill seeking to begin U.S. troop withdrawals from Iraq. “Up or down vote” was killed by a desperate Republican Party trying to obstruct Democratic accomplishments at any cost in advance of the 2008 elections. And so far, the GOP seems to be getting away with the crime.

    For the details, see:
    “Up or Down Vote: Death of a GOP Talking Point.”

  • Sen. Reid once called the President a “loser” in front of teenagers during a civics discussion in a high school. — the RNC talking points

    On this point, I agree with the Repub criticism of Reid; that was not well done on his part. Our children deserve better — they deserve the *truth*. The President is not a “loser”; he’s a CRIMINAL. A Constitution molester/rapist.

    And it’s immaterial whether it was all his own idea, or whether it’s the fault of the company he keeps (Dick-traitor); both of them should be dumped into some choice oubliette.

  • I like it, because I think Senator Reid will kick their little pissy-pants into the next election, where more than a few of those vunerable Repubs will be retired.

    [BuzzMon #5]

    Exactly so. And you know what? Thanks to the ReThuglican name calling Olympics of the past few years, words like liar and loser would hardly ruffle a hair of the average voter even if they weren’t already pissed at the ReThugs. As things stand, (and libra points out) they’re more likely thinking Reid is going easy on their arses and perhaps admiring his restraint.

    So yes, please RNC. Whine when Reid points out in his mild little voice that President Bush is the worst president in America. Point your fat little fingers and sob “He was mean to meeee!” The 28 25 percenters will coo in sympathy while the rest of the country laughs.

  • Homer @ #12 is right: recognize the repug talking points for what they are (irrelevant) and turn the discussion to what the Dems are trying to accomplish (which a majority of Americans want) and how the repugs are obstructing them.

  • The Repuklicans mounting another “borg” attack isn’t new news.

    Seeing the Senator from Nevada mounting a counter-attack,the DC DEMS mounting a counter-attack with heavy return fire on some GOP WashDC leaders wayward ways and spotty records of conduct and said so’s would be news. Refreshing too.

    I expect the DC DEMS to take lots of incoming fire while doing the job before them. I believe Senator Reid to be a decent fella. I wish his DC junkyard dog demeanor performances were better but like Rummy the Dummy would put it…”you fight in DC with the DC DEMS you have” and so there you are and here we are.

    I do think the DC DEMS should pull the rope together more and put in place a central war room and spokespersons who are adept at being funny,
    snarly and enlightening. The use of humor when properly done is a great educator and equally performs well at clownish conduct reveal.

    Harry Reid seems like a nice guy. The RNC is anything but nice based on the long record it has of taking the low road often and abusing truth, facts and decency of conduct.

    The DC DEMS are going to have to lose the WallyMart “greeter” look and sound and go with more of a Jon Stewart TDS plan.

    Elsewise they can expect to get the full RNC/GOPer ACME CO. treatment with no letup.

    Hell…the 109th Congress record under GOPer management provides a long list of …”oh..by the way” memory lane specials.

    So…DC DEMS…think it’s hot now…wait till summer 2008…when the RNC and GOPers turn the burners up full…

    Get with it or get hit. Lose the greeter look and find some humorous albeit effective junkyard dogs.

  • I’m not sure why the Democratic Caucus seems to believe that responding with a laundry list of accomplishments is adequate. Why not simply respond with statistics– such as the number of cloture votes Reid has had to file in the last six months, compared to the number in the preceding six years? I think such a simple comparison would quickly show who’s been obstructing whom in the Senate.

  • Listening to the liberals here whine and whine about the 60-vote rule in the Senate-the same rule the Dems demanded for last 6 yrs for just about anything controversial is funny. Liberals like bjbotts whine: The senate would have an outstanding bipartisan record if the republican obstructionists would stop blocking legislation from even being allowed to be voted on by senate members. DUDE or whatever you are quit whining. I found out when the gopers rollover to the dems demands its bipartisanship-LOL anyway leftists in here remind of those in baseball who throw at other teams hitters or slide hard into shortstops crying to the umpires when another team retaliates. My response to them is quit crying and charge the mound like a man or woman or whatever libs are.

  • liberals in here need to remember just because the house was won by 90,000 votes out of 80 million and senate was won by a few thousand doesn’t mean the Senate can be turned into the U.S. House. Oh for thw gold old days when the Dems could ram bills through the House and through the Senate thanks to huge majorities and the likes of Chafee Sr. Danforth, Kassebaum, Jeffords, etc voting to shut off debate with them.

  • Harry Reid is very venerable in the Nevada position – I’m not sure why the Dems feel compelled to put Reid in harms way by making him the Dem leader, and thus a constant target. Reid could very easily lose his seat. Chris Dodd or Sen. Webb would be a much better choice.

  • Comments are closed.