GOP slips as the party ‘friendly to religion’

After several months of Republicans hoping to prove their piety, a new report from the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, a non-partisan organization, showed that the GOP’s efforts didn’t work — and maybe even did more harm than good.

A new poll shows that fewer Americans view the Republican Party as “friendly to religion” than a year ago, with the decline particularly steep among Catholics and white evangelical Protestants — constituencies at the core of the Republicans’ conservative Christian voting bloc.

The survey found that the proportion of Americans who say the Republican Party is friendly to religion fell 8 percentage points in the last year, to 47 percent from 55 percent. Among Catholics and white evangelical Protestants, the decline was 14 percentage points.

Of course, the public still perceives Dems as not being friendly enough to religion, but the results were largely unchanged from the previous year. Indeed, the exact same percentage said the Dems were “unfriendly” to religion as 12 months ago. It was the GOP that saw the major drop.

John Green, senior fellow in religion and American politics at the Pew Forum said the change among Catholics and white evangelical Protestants was striking. “It’s unclear how directly this will translate into voting behavior,” Green said, “but this is a baseline indicator that religious conservatives see the party they’ve chosen to support as less friendly to religion than they used to.”

It’s worth taking a moment to consider why, though the answer is less than obvious. Indeed, some of the possible explanations contradict each other.

One possibility is that conservative Christians feel used and neglected. They expected Republican majorities to embrace a Taliban-like agenda that intertwined their faith and the government, but they’ve recently come to realize that GOP leaders like to talk about religion, but there’s no real follow through. It’s a campaign gimmick that cynically exploits the religious right base without tangible victories. Maybe the precipitous drop is symptomatic of the religious right saying, “Enough. You guys aren’t what we had hoped for.”

Or maybe it’s the opposite. It seems almost as likely that Catholics and white evangelical Protestants take a far broader view of what it means to be “friendly to religion” than the Republican habit of exploiting anti-gay animus and backing the occasional Ten Commandments monument. The GOP’s emphasis shows no real spiritual depth; it’s just another political issue to the party.

In either case, Green said, “At the minimum, there will be less good will toward the Republican Party by these conservative religious groups, and a disenchantment that the party will be able to deliver on its promises.”

I don’t expect religious-right-friendly voters to suddenly start contributing to the DNC — though some might — but if a sizable percentage of Christian conservatives no longer consider the GOP friendly to religion, and are less inclined to be the party’s foot-soldiers, these poll results may hint at a serious problem for the Republican Party in the coming cycle or two.

This question, of course, was just a small part of a thorough and interesting report from Pew Forum (brought to my attention by reader R.P.), which is definitely worth checking out.

This seems a little odd, at least in the definitions. The groups that I see as right-wing/fundamental religionists–evangelicals, the generic no-denomination mega-churches, the anti-science and public education crazies–don’t even acknowledge the Catholics as christians. The pollers seem to lump them all together, where their agendas seem pretty diverse.

  • The GOP has pandered to this group for years. I think they did realize that they were being used, finally. I also think that the general populace that bought into this meme without question but also didn’t care also finally realized that this meme was false advertising. I think all the way around the blinder were either pulled off or the elephant in the room could no longer be ignored. The GOP finally proved (though some still won’t see it) that religion, moral values and the like is a wedge issue to be used and wrung dry during elections and times of political trouble and then discarded when no one is looking or when things are looking a bit rosier.

  • I’ve got to go with les here. One portion of the religious right actually follows Jesus’ teachings about the poor and so on. They may find abortion abhorent, but they know there is more to Christianity than blowing up clinics and starting wars in the Middle East. The other portion of the religious right, the Theocratic Reactionaries, believe there was a time in America when (their) religion was actually the guiding force in politics, and they want to ‘go back to the golden age’. It’s a load of crap, of course (except for John Adams’ administration), but they can’t let go.

    And simply put, the more the Republican’ts cater to one strain of the Religious Right, the more they turn off the other 😉

    Now, as a Democrat, I can say: “I appreciate your truely held beliefs and I don’t mind you voting your convictions, but I’m not going to use state power to enforce your concept down the throats of good Americans.” and get away with it. Republican’ts can’t because they have promised to do the shoving, no matter how much it gags America.

  • There is a small hope that some of this crowd will feel sufficiently alienated and attempt to form a third “Dominionist Party.” Advocating a Theocratic United States might allow them to bellow and fuss more stridently, but as many have noted, it would force a delightful schism upon what has been a relatively monolithic movement.

  • The Theofascist sub-regimen within the GOP went too far, too fast it trying to establish their Bible-based dominionism; they flexed their political muscle while there was still enough power behind the various opposition-factions to push back harder. They also had to deal with the Afghani Taliban stealing the show, before they could get their own version of absolutist government in place, with the outcome being that—at least for the near-term—they’ll be pretty much a meaningless puddle of goo….

  • I don’t really see any contradiction, unless you lump all Christians together. As a comment indicated above, you have Christians who actually make an effort to follow the teachings of Christ and a bunch of hateful small minded people who want a punative theocracy.

    The first group is getting hit by both sides, feed the rich/screw the poor GOP policies, along with seemingly un-Christian things like war and attrocities, rub them the wrong way and over the top gay bashing rhetoric makes them uneasy. The still feel strongly about some issues, but the double whammy has them peeling off in droves.

    The theocrats want eugenics for gays, or at least public floggings and are getting a little tired of waiting. Still, they don’t peel off in as high a numbers because a) the rank and file isn’t all that well informed and b) the leaders realize that, grumbling aside, if they stopped playing ass-monkey for the GOP they would be truly marginal and have virtually no influence.

    -jjf

  • There are nuts and fanatics in any segment of the population, but there a lot of religious voters who have economic anxieties just like anyone else. Many traditonalist Christians are closer to Democrats in terms of economic thinking and would be open to voting Democratic if so many activists in our party didn’t insist on defining abortion rights and gay marriage as the core values of the party. If you want to personally support abortion rights and gay marriage that’s fine, but the main focus of the Democratic Party should be on our philosophy of governing and economics rather than on divisive social issues. A Democratic Party that can accept differences of opinion on the social issues will eventually become a majority party.

  • Comments are closed.