Al Gore is enjoying a very good press day, and I couldn’t be more pleased. He’s not only earned a Nobel Peace Prize, he’s also established himself as a global leader. Today is, I’m sure, an amazing honor for the former Vice President, but today is also a reminder of an amazing series of accomplishments.
As Noam Scheiber noted, that sets up an interesting contrast between the two men who vied for the presidency seven years ago.
Watching Al Gore take a well-deserved victory lap this afternoon, I couldn’t help wondering what George W. Bush must be thinking. I mean, I know the guy still believes history will vindicate him and all, but, really, this has got to be pretty painful. Bush, according to various accounts of the 2000 campaign, absolutely despised Gore. He regarded him as a preening, self-righteous phony.
So Bush somehow manages to avenge his father’s defeat and vanquish the vice president of the United States. And yet, seven years later, it’s Gore who’s being hailed around the world as a prophet and a savior and Bush who, if he’s still being discussed at all, is mentioned only as the punchline to some joke, or when his poll numbers reach some new historic low. It must eat him up.
That sounds about right. The NYT’s Jim Rutenberg takes a look at how Gore has spent the last several years, and all of his efforts have been impressive. He argued against the war in Iraq, and predicted the ensuing disaster perfectly. He created an Emmy-award winning cable network. He was the focus of an Oscar-winning documentary. He’s won a Nobel Peace Prize. He’s done more than anyone on the planet to wake people up to the environmental crisis posed by global warming. And on the political front, Gore became perhaps the strongest and most articulate progressive leader in the United States.
Everything Bush touched led to disaster. Everything Gore focused on turned out to be right.
Not bad for a guy who Chris Matthews said “went off and grew that beard and got weird” after his defeat in the 2000 presidential election.
Josh Marshall also highlights the “irony and poetic justice” of Gore’s Nobel.
The first is that the greatest step for world peace would simply have been for Gore not to have had the presidency stolen from him in November 2000. By every just measure, Gore won the presidency in 2000 only to have George W. Bush steal it from him with the critical assistance of the US Supreme Court. It’s worth taking a few moments today to consider where the country and world would be without that original sin of this corrupt presidency.
And yet this is a fitting bookend, with Gore receiving this accolade while the sitting president grows daily an object of greater disapproval, disapprobation and collective shame. And let’s not discount another benefit: watching the rump of the American right detail the liberal bias of the Nobel Committee and at this point I guess the entire world. Fox News vs. the world.
And not to forget what this award is about even more than Gore. If half of what we think we know about global warming is true, people will look back fifty years from now on the claims that “War on Terror” was the defining challenge of this century and see it as a very sick, sad joke — which rather sums up the Bush presidency.
That’s true; Gore’s public responses today haven’t been about him, they’ve been about his message. The media is preoccupied with horserace nonsense, but Gore continues to do what he always has, emphasize his public education campaign and the need for action.
The world is lucky to have him.