Gore is ‘getting the band back together’

Right on schedule. In the third week in February, speculation about Al [tag]Gore[/tag]’s future picked up considerably with high-profile columns from Roger J. Stone Jr. and Dick Morris. In the third week in March, a cover story for The American Prospect renewed talk about another [tag]presidential[/tag] [tag]campaign[/tag] for Gore, which prompted the former VP to say he’s not “planning to be a candidate again,” but he hasn’t “reached a stage in my life where I’m willing to say I will never consider something like this.”

Now it’s the third week in April. Guess what the hot topic of conversation is.

[tag]Al Gore[/tag] is getting the band back together. In a move that could inch him closer to another bid at the presidency in [tag]2008[/tag], the former vice president has hired Roy Neel, a veteran of presidential politics, to help run his current campaign to raise awareness of global warming.

“His profile is going up considerably because of his work on global warming,” said Neel, a longtime Gore aide who also ran Howard Dean’s presidential campaign. The presidential speculation, Neel said, “is clearly flattering, but he’s doing nothing to plan a presidential campaign right now.”

Neel will coordinate a growing effort. Gore is starring in a new documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth,” which opens next month. He’s written a new book, and another aide said he will soon open a training institute, all focused on bringing political will to bear on rising global temperatures.

For that matter, it raised a few eyebrows yesterday when National Journal reported that Gore paid $40,000 to his former pollster recently. Was it related to 2008? A Gore advisor said the payment “is related to an ’00 campaign commitment.”

The scuttlebutt prompted the WaPo’s Richard Cohen to write, “[O]n paper, he is the near-perfect Democratic candidate for 2008.”

Among other things, he won the popular vote in 2000. He opposed going to war in Iraq, but he supported the Persian Gulf War — right both times. He is smart, experienced and, despite the false caricatures, a man versed in the new technologies — especially the Internet. He is much more a person of the 21st century than most of the other potential candidates. Trouble is, a campaign is not a film. Gore could be a great president. First, though, he has to be a good candidate.

In the meantime, he is a man on a mission. Wherever he goes — and he travels incessantly — he finds time and an audience to deliver his (free) lecture on global warming. It and the film leave no doubt of the peril we face, nor do they leave any doubt that Gore, at last, is a man at home in his role. He is master teacher, pedagogue, know-it-all, smarter than most of us, better informed and, having tried and failed to gain the presidency, he has raised his sights to save the world. We simply cannot afford for Al Gore to lose again.

Here’s a link to the trailer for Gore’s new movie and the Amazon listing for Gore’s new book. Stay tuned.

“Trouble is, a campaign is not a film. Gore could be a great president. First, though, he has to be a good candidate.” – Richard Cohen

I wonder if the film was just an excuse to learn a little acting ability which might help him seem less stiff and speak more ‘presidentially’ in 2008.

Other than his and Tipper’s inclination to try and raise my children for me, I’ve always been impressed with Gore, and I think he would be the best choice in 2008.

  • I like it. I could get behind Gore. It could be like a re-do. This whole idea that once you lose an election that you are un-electable is not true IMO. In this case the world has changed so much in the last 5 years that Gore now stands in stark contrast to the Neo-con position.

    He’s still smart, still experienced, and still from Tennessee.

    Ross I like the Gore/Obama thought but I think Gore/Clinton would be interesting (talk about getting the band back together). Maybe featuring Secretary of State Bill Clinton? Obama might need a little more seasoning. Gore–>Clinton–>Obama. Once we get used to a female POTUS we can look at an African American POTUS.

  • Gore / Obama works perfectly for me. (Two Gore terms, followed by two of Obama & perhaps Boxer.)

    Boring and competent – two qualities I’ve come to prize in a president..

    2008, the nation gets a do-over!

  • I can’t think of a better nominee than Al Gore
    for 2008. He would make a good, possibly
    great president in 2008, and would work hard
    to reverse the incredible damage done by
    the Bush administration. He would direct
    the nation toward the real issues of the 21st
    century, dig us out from the fearmongering,
    negativism of the last six years, and return
    us to the family of nations intent upon making
    this a better world for all peoples.

    I also think he could probably win. I don’t
    believe any other Democratic candidate
    can.

    But if we don’t begin to do something to
    bring his candidacy about, it’s not likely
    to happen. We can’t sit around like the
    DLC doing absolutely nothing in anticipation
    of the Republicans self imploding. I don’t
    believe Al Gore will run unless there is a
    clear groundswell of support long before
    the campaign begins.

    The question becomes, then: how do we
    do this.? How do we begin a grass roots
    movement like Moveon?

    I’m serious. We need to DO SOMETHING!
    Not sit around waiting for it to happen.

  • al gore would be an excellent democratic candidate

    and an even better president.

    but

    richard cohen is too dumb to know a good candidate from a bad one.

    most likely he was just trying for a little journalistic controversy, which is his style.

    it is the case, though,

    that al gore has the experience, intellect, and political personality to make an exceptional president.

  • Gore/Clinton…eh, that just sounds like asking for another bloody nose. I think Hillary is a wonderful Senator, but the unfortunate fact is that the Right created a cottage industry out of attacking her when she was only the First Lady, and didn’t have any legal power. They’re just licking thier chops at the prospect of being able to dust off thier old playbooks and jump right back into “attack Hitlery” mode again.

    As for Obama being unseasoned, well, yeah, that’s a concerned, but I honestly don’t think this guy is unable to climb a steep learning curve. There have been other (not many of course) political figures who have grown in influance and power as much as he has. It can be done.

  • I’m tempted to hold my breath on two questions regarding Gore:

    First, will he run again and, if so, will it be in 2008? I sincerely hope so, but expect him not to do so because of the CCCP and the SCOTUS in the 2000 debacle.

    Second, and more importantly, will Richard Cohen and his cohort yet again engage in the deeply shameful tactic of creating what Cohen now conveniently calls “the false caricatures” of Gore? I would sincerely hope not, but expect both Cohen and the rest of the CCCP to do exactly that.

    Al Gore is too good for America; we NEED him but we don’t DESERVE him. I don’t mean Mr. C.B. or Ed, or hark, or others here, or even the MAJORITY of Americans that voted for him in 2000. I mean, instead, that if we are so damn dumb as a collective electorate NOT to demand more than dishonesty and lies from our CCCP, then we don’t deserve him. Just like Jimmy Carter is a much better man than those who demean and snicker at him, Gore too is much better than anything we have had in the White House since Carter (yes, even better than the Big Dog).

    The problem with those who support the Rethugs and their Lying.Fucking.Dangerous.Bastards is a simple human flaw: it is almost impossible for a man to believe/accept that someone else is more honest than he is himself . The correllary is exqually true: it is almost impossible for someone to believe/accept that someone else is LESS honest than he is himself. The liars know when they lie, and choose to proceed anyway. The “victims” trust blindly, and get used over and over again, until finally they get so disgusted that they just walk away. We are, I believe, now at that collective point in this country.

    It takes the death of outrage for change to occur. We are finally finding our decision and courage to change, as we have so much outrage that we simply can no longer accept anything these jerks do or say. Change IS a’comin’!

    Republicans Cheat and Lie…. Had Enough? Vote Democratic!

  • Re-elect Gore in ’08! Gore would be my first second and third choices for Dem nominee in ’08.

  • While I’m glad to see that Gore is finally getting some long overdue respect, it takes a helluva lotta gall for a mediocrity like Cohen to pen the op-ed that he did. Cohen was one of those nobodies who was more concerned about the color of Gore’s suits than anything he had to say. It would have been more appropriate for Cohen to write something like, “I was too stupid and trivial-minded to understand the choice in 2000. I deeply regret my error. That is all.”

  • Oh, god. Just when I was starting to feel good about Gore, along comes Richard Cohen to spoil it. If that simpleton thinks it’s a good idea, there must be something wrong with it.

  • I agree with everything AL just said. I also agree with almost everything that Al (Gore) says. I would LOVE to see a Gore/Obama candidacy.

    If you haven’t picked up the Vanity Fair ‘Green’ issue, I highly recommend it.
    Here’s a link to the cover.

  • I like Gore, but I think he needs a new band. These guys weren’t exactly the Blues Brothers…

  • Amen, Alan. Amen. I’m totally on board the Gore train, but he cannot make the same mistake he has spent the last five years undoing. He can’t let himself get trapped by the consultants.

  • “He can’t let himself get trapped by the consultants.” – jhupp

    But, but…
    😉
    … the whole point of campaigns is to make consultants rich.

    It certainly is not to bring opposing agendas before the American people to allow them to choose the right path for the future.

  • I can’t believe how ridiculous this is. Do democrats really think gore could come anywhere close to winning the election? He couldn’t beat bush BEFORE 9/11. Not to mention the fact the the democratic leadership is just as fucked up as the republicans, just with half the balls to do anything about it. We need fresh faces in politics, not the same old stale ones. If gore is our hope for 2008, it’s time to move to canada.

  • I agree, apparently with just about everybody, on Gore.

    I’m not so sure that a first-term (or nearly so) Senator like Clinton or Obama (each of whom is already on the road to building a powerful legislative career) would be the ideal running mate. I’ve suggested Gore/Edwards (he will have been out of “the debate club” for four years), but I’m open to anyone with some executive experience (governor, mayor, general).

    But please, please, please … don’t use the retread consultants (think tie color) who have cost us so much in past and who fly in the face of Howard Dean’s 50-state philosophy, pouring all their efforts into the beltway. God, not that.

  • “[Gore] couldn’t beat bush BEFORE 9/11.” – jakethesnake

    Actually, he really did beat Bush in 2000. The counting was just wrong.

    As for 9/11, it may have been a boost in 2004, but only because Cheney and Bush lied to the American people. Now that their lies are revealed, I doubt it is any more benefit to the Republicanites.

    Not to mention the fact that a solid argument could be made that a Gore presidency would have been on the ball enough (not reducing the Terrorism czar to meeting with deputies, for instance) to actually stop the 9/11 attacks. Clinton/Gore stopped the Millenium attacks and TOLD the Bush Transition team that terrorism (particularly Al Quaeda) was more important than rouge states.

  • “terrorism (particularly Al Quaeda) was more important than rouge states.”

    In fairness to the Bush administration’s concern for “rouge” states, I will say that makeup, wrongly applied, can make someone look pretty scary. Imagine a whole country like that!…

  • “He’s still from Tennessee…”

    He LOST his home state in 2000. His being from the south wasn’t remotely useful to him in that election.

    Following conventional wisdom, though, his being out of government for eight years will be a big aid to him, as opposed to the bevy of Democratic senators who are looking to run.

    It’s nice that he’s talking about the environment again; hopefully if he runs this time, he won’t STOP talking about it like he did in 2000.

  • If Gore’s getting the band back together … it must mean he’s on a mission a from God. Who in the faith-based community wouldn’t support that?

    I hope this country is ready to vote for the smart guy rather than another Republican we’d rather drink in a bar with.

  • Good point, Bob. I would really like to see the Dems get some balls when it comes to dealing with the South and stop trying to try and win them with shallow and superfical appeals like “Well he grew up near you, that’s got to count for something…right?”

    I would absolutely LOVE to see a ticket that didn’t consider having one of the two running mates be from the South a necessity.

  • Go Al Gore!!! I would follow Gore anywhere. He is a true Leader! He is the one Democrat who can win the White House. He has the most credibility of any Democrat. He supported the Persian Gulf War, he opposed the Iraq War. He left the nation with a Surplus when he was Vice President, now we have the biggest Deficit.

    He is intelligent, creative, articulate, and a military veteran; take that Right Wing Zealots. I think he learned from 2000 to not listen to Cable News, and NO Lieberman! He was also the first Democrat to criticize Bush, to call Bush on the Iraqi Blunder, and to take Bush to task. Go Gore!!!!

  • Gore/Obama: I’d be more than happy to donate to that effort. We’ll need nothing less if we still have half a chance to put this country together again.

  • I like where you are all going on this one. But for VP, may I suggest Jack Murtha. Clean politician with incredible military background. A nice balance to Gore.

  • I think we need Obama right where he is.

    And Al, if you’re reading this…

    PLEASE RUN!

  • Gore / Clark for sure
    If not, then Gore / anybody but Clinton, plus Clark for Sec of State and Zinni for Sec of Defense

  • If Gore runs, he will get the poop kicked out of him again, especially if he listens to the same people who “helped” him in 2000 and who “helped” Kerry in 2004.
    Can’t we do any better than this?

  • Go Gore! I think the VP choices are interesting thus far. Obama is just too inexperienced. The GOP would shred him. Democrats must make sure they win, the Nation would be destroyed with another Repulican President. Gore is the choice to win, as for a Vice President, I agree that Murtha and Clark are excellent choices, especially to reinforce Democratic ability to be tough with Defense and National Security.

    Don’t count out John Edwards from taking another shot at a VP Run if Gore is the man. Biden as Gore’s VP would be ideal.

  • Gore is ,by far,the best choice for the Democrats in 2008.But NOT withe Biden,Clarke,or that ‘ragin moderate’,Obama.I do think Obama will be on the ticket,but so far he is a DLC Democrat,and that’s NOT GOOD.

  • I hope Gore runs, but that takes money and Hillary and Kerry have most of it. What really makes me mad is that Kerry has about $14,000,000, and most of it is left over money from ’04. (Maybe he might have won if he had spent it.) I hope that if Gore runs, he will have learned something about finding his own voice. The Lieberman decision was very stupid and nakedly political.

  • I did not like Gore in 88 because he ran to the right. I still have trouble trusting that the Gore of then is not lurking below the surface.

    I am also not sure I have forgiven Gore for 00, nor am I sure I trust him with one of the most important campaigns of my lifetime given what a truly, unspeakably awful job he did last time. Running away from the 8-year Clinton/Gore record of peace, prosperity, more cops on the street, embracing a new world of technologies, and enhancing global relationships – just because he was having a little tantrum at Clinton – was so pathetically stupid it is hard to even imagine how it happened.

    All of that said, I do think he has learned some things (like “do not wear orange makeup for your debates”), and he now comes off rather like the elder statesman of the party. The things he was derided about on past years have proven to be prescient. And being a technocrat, he is well suited for a “competence matters” campaign.

    I think he would do well as a candidate, and likely as Pres, but in a primary campaign I’m still just not sure I could back him.

  • Two issues which rate at or close to the top for me are the environment and an open internet. Gore has about the only track record which has not just shown concern in those areas, but commitment and activism. I have up close and personal acquaintance with Gore in his drive to make the internet readily accessible to all. Who’d have thunk, in 1995 (say), that the greed machine would be so close to gobbling up this open forum? A new administration has one helluva job ahead when it comes to undoing the damage of the past five years.

    Two issues which worry me are 1) Donna Brazille (as a symbol of a really badly run campaign), and 2) intransigence of many supporters on the abortion issue. And there’s something, below the surface, about Gore’s… attitude? squishiness?… something that continues to bother me.

  • Wow….

    So Gore thinks he can be a crappy contender twice, and somehow come out big. I do hope he does run so that the Republicans can just run a train on his ass.

    Thanks

  • Comments are closed.