Guilty of being ‘overly friendly’?

Update: Foley has resigned.

Nothing, and I mean literally nothing, captures the attention of the political world like a scandal involving sex. With this in mind, I was inclined to wait and see what happens with this story, but in light of the interest, I figured it was probably worth a post.

I noted briefly yesterday that there’s a new flap involving a member of Congress and a 16-year-old page, but this story seems to be picking up momentum quickly. ABC News’ Politics page now lists this as its top story of the day.

A 16-year-old male congressional [tag]page[/tag] concerned about the appropriateness of an e-mail exchange with a congressman alerted Capitol Hill staffers to the communication.

Congressman [tag]Mark Foley[/tag]’s office says the e-mails were entirely appropriate and that their release is part of a smear campaign by his opponent.

In the series of e-mails, obtained by ABC News, between the page and Rep. Foley (R-FL), Foley asks the page how old he is, what he wants for his birthday and requests a photo of him.

Foley’s office acknowledges that the Florida Republican wrote the emails, but says the lawmaker is only guilty of being overly friendly.

I haven’t seen all the emails, so I don’t have a sense of context, but given media reports, Foley may be guilty of more than that.

The e-mails were sent from Foley’s personal AOL account. In one, Foley writes, “did you have fun at your conference…what do you want for your birthday coming up…what stuff do you like to do.”

In another Foley writes, “how are you weathering the hurricane…are you safe…send me an email pic of you as well…”

Foley’s office says it is their policy to keep pictures of former interns and anyone who may ask for a recommendation on file so they can remember them — but the page in question did not work or intern for Foley’s office. The page was also not from Foley’s district (or even state).

Now, it’s possible there’s some context we’re missing here. Maybe Foley’s knows the 16-year-old page’s family. Maybe Foley asks what other teenaged pages want for their birthday all the time.

But in this case, this particular page didn’t care for the personal attention, and alerted congressional staffers to the emails. In one message, the page writes to a staffer, “Maybe it is just me being paranoid, but seriously. This freaked me out.”

By the time Foley asked the kid for his picture, the page forwarded the congressman’s message to a congressional staffer saying it was “sick sick sick sick sick.”

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) today asked the House Ethics Committee to investigate the matter, saying, “The House of Representatives has an obligation to protect the teenagers who come to Congress to learn about the legislative process. To fulfill that responsibility, the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct must investigate any allegation that a page has been subjected to sexual advances by members of the House and, should those allegations prove true, take swift action to punish the offenders.”

[tag]Foley[/tag] has been expected to cruise to re-election this year. It may not be quite as certain a lock as it was before yesterday.

Ummm, yeah, overly friendly. Does this guy have a country to govern or does he just email 16 year old boys all day? WTF?

Hey CB, I enjoy your blog. How is the weather today in Carpetbagger land? Do you have a sister? Can I have a picture of her in a bikini??

Yours truely,

Mr. I’m Just SOOOOO Friendly!

  • Do you have a sister?

    “Maybe it is just me being paranoid, but seriously. This freaked me out.”

  • SEX!!! Now we have a scandal the media will pursue! To hell with the fact we just lost our national soul in yesterday’s Senate vote and we are hearing nothing but bald-faced lies from everyone with an R after their name. If Foley asked the kid for a blowjob we’d have something this nation could spend tens of millions investigating before Congress … well, if Foley was a Demorat they would.

  • All I can say is that I was relieved to finally read that the Congressman was a Republican. It doesn’t take much for conservatives to write someone off as whatever they’d like to believe that person is guilty of.

    Quite on the other hand, I like to think we’re a much more rational bunch over here in the reality-based community, and I hardly think an e-mail exchange, a request for a photo and asking someone for their birth date, is just cause to start a witch hunt.

  • So, does this mean we need a new Republican group? We already have the Log Cabin Republicans, but this doesn’t fit.

    How about the Lincoln Log Repubulicans? The Play Station Republicans?

    No? OK, fine, someone let me know when CB posts photos of his sister.

  • Sheesh. kids are sooooo stupid… I bet he could have gotten a LOT more than a piece of candy from the congressman to keep his mouth shut…

  • Is there something particular about Florida and Republican’ts?

    Harris and this guy?

    Honestly, I think we are jumping the gun a little. And I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if the RNC decided to sacrifice this guy just to keep us off the topic of Iraq and the Bushite’s failures on the War on Terrorism (stupid name).

  • Geez, it’s not like the kid was a prostitute and routinely given access to the Whitehouse or something. THEN we might get an investigation.

    Or not.

  • Nothing, and I mean literally nothing, captures the attention of the political world like a scandal involving sex.

    With the curious exception, of course, of the whole Jeff Gannon/Guckert thing. I’m still REALLY confused and disappointed that that didn’t blossom into anything.

  • Could Foley be yet another self-loathing closeted gay Repug getting popped out into the light like a blinking and grumpy cockroach? What a surprise.

  • The Republican’ts.

    Cannot keep it in their pants.

    Strange perverted stance.

    This English language haiku (NOW with rhymes!!) is brought to you by the National Council of People Who Have Nothing Better To Do with Their Lives.

  • When you read the emails, you’ll realize it’s creepier than you first imagined.

    http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/09/gop-congressman-admits-to-says-nothing.html

    Furthermore, he sent these from his personal account. If this was really related to a recommendation, or future job prospects, etc, it should have been done through appropriate work related channels, and Id also think, given the importance of a Congressmans time, that he’d have a low level staffer keep in touch with this kid.

    The comments about the friend are even creepier…

    This is not just a friendly little exchange…it’s the prelude to pedophilia. (Perhaps not in this case, since the legal age is 16, but the intent is enough)

  • This is the guy who dropped out of the Senate race 2 or 4 years ago, after raising $3M, because of rumors about his personal life (being gay). And his claim to fame (check out his website) is his legislative action protecting kids from sexual predators.

    You’d think he would have been a bit more discrete.

  • Why is it that these things always seem to happen to Republican lawmakers and to Roman Catholic priests? Could the common thread be a rather juvenile obsession with sex?

  • Thanks G2000.

    Am I the only one who isn’t disturbed so much by the content of the emails but the fact this sumbitch has all of the grammatical skills of an eight year old?

    But this is a tad…icky:
    “Acts much older than his age and he’s in great shape”
    I wonder if Foley (as in catheter?) will tell us who Will is.

    Must go wash hands.

    p.s. Gridlock, thou art a genius.

  • Ed- I think you have a point, but it’s not just an obsession with sex. Rather, it’s about pregnancy. Remember, these people are severely anti-abortion… What’s the best way to, ummmm, enjoy yourself without worrying about pregnancy?… same-sex relationships… Hey, that works! (I mean, I always thought there was something odd about LOG-cabin republicans… always seemed to be an insider joke there somewhere).

  • Hey guys, don’t get too excited about one less Republican in the House.

    If he did/does resign, the devil is in the details. When is the effective date of the resignation? Can he be readily replaced on the Florida ballot? What happens if his name on the November ballot get more votes than his Democratic opponent?

    Of course, the real question is: Does this mean that the Democrats need one less seat to pickup in the House?

  • The Refucklican choices are:

    1. Pretend it didn’t happen.
    2. Claim every one else making a big deal out of nothing.
    3. Stone Foley for making them look bad.
    4. Turn Foley into some sort of Poster Child for Repentant Republicans and have him make some half-assed non-confession in which he attempts to blur the line between being gay and being a pedophile.

  • Gridlock: “This English language haiku (NOW with rhymes!!) is brought to you by the National Council of People Who Have Nothing Better To Do with Their Lives.”

    … or NAMBLA. ;o)

  • skip kid

    details here.

    Short version: Foley’s name stays on ballot, votes to that name transfer automatically to other Gooper designated by local party officials.

    Given that not many people will want to vote for a perceived pedophile, (even if the actual vote goes to someone else) this seat is now “lean Dem.”

    Chortle.

  • Foley’s name will remain on the ballot, but the votes for him will go to his replacement. The new guy has a month to get known. And anyway, who the hell’s going to vote for a pedophile’s name? I think we can count this as a Dem seat. Corrupt Republicans will face the consequences on 11/7.

  • Comments are closed.