‘Half the foreign fighters in Iraq’

This might put a crimp in the White House’s talking points.

Although Bush administration officials have frequently lashed out at Syria and Iran, accusing it of helping insurgents and militias here, the largest number of foreign fighters and suicide bombers in Iraq come from a third neighbor, Saudi Arabia, according to a senior U.S. military officer and Iraqi lawmakers.

About 45% of all foreign militants targeting U.S. troops and Iraqi civilians and security forces are from Saudi Arabia; 15% are from Syria and Lebanon; and 10% are from North Africa, according to official U.S. military figures made available to The Times by the senior officer. Nearly half of the 135 foreigners in U.S. detention facilities in Iraq are Saudis, he said.

Fighters from Saudi Arabia are thought to have carried out more suicide bombings than those of any other nationality, said the senior U.S. officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the subject’s sensitivity. It is apparently the first time a U.S. official has given such a breakdown on the role played by Saudi nationals in Iraq’s Sunni Arab insurgency.

He said 50% of all Saudi fighters in Iraq come here as suicide bombers. In the last six months, such bombings have killed or injured 4,000 Iraqis.

The LA Times’ report suggests this reality has left the U.S. in an “awkward position,” because the Saudis are ostensibly a key ally in the region, which apparently has been unsuccessful in preventing its citizens from committing acts of terror in Iraq.

Or, put another way, Andrew Sullivan explains, “The Saudis, of course, are among the Bush family’s closest friends, so we neither mention nor tackle this. The gulf between the reality in the Middle East and the president’s account of it grows wider and wider.”

Here’s the Dickster with the Saudi king. The article says the trip was planned weeks ahead, but, at the time, the news said it was more of a sudden event called for by the Saudi king. The Saudi king whistled and Dick “Nothing Left to Lose” Cheney jumped. Time for a new energy policy or the threat of Saudis into the Iraqi fray. Sudden event makes more sense for security purposes, but the Pencil Dick returned to the US on the same day he arrived in Saudi Arabia. Afraid or unwilling to spend a night over there. Probably had to return to his coffin like Dracula in the undisclosed location.

  • Aren’t the Saudis just the Middle-Eastern branch of the Bush Crime Family? Other major branches would be the Carlisle Group and Halliburton.

    My Dad always said (during the Eisenhower regime) that when the Democrats steal they take freezers and mink coats whereas Republicans steal interstate highway projects and defense system contracts. He noted that the press even then paid attention only to the more easily pictured thefts by Democrats.

    Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

  • the largest number of foreign fighters and suicide bombers in Iraq come from a third neighbor, Saudi Arabia, according to a senior U.S. military officer and Iraqi lawmakers.

    Whoa, we have all been made dupes of some serious propaganda distortion with that Iran / Syria line for a while now.

  • One can puzzle out that given current ME volatility the Saudis are quite willing to let militant/heated political activist Saudi nationals migrate to Iraq to practice or exercise any blow up/mayhem impulse they may hold or harbor.

    As the Americans might put it…”let them blow themselves up and fight in Iraq so they don’t blow up or fight here” seems a very pragmatic Saudi take on lots of Saudis going to Iraq.

    Given the history of the 9/11 attack and who was involved in it and where several attackers did come from the Bush/Cheney regime early on showed how any such unwanted facts or major contributing evidence was going to get hushed,played down or fully “Cheneyized” == concealed/shrouded”.

    Naturally attacking Iraq was a much more desireable choice then going after Saudi Arabia.

    And surely the idea of attacking Iran now is a much more tempting next American ME strategy ploy than going after Saudi Arabia.

    This inherent duplicity and act/react convolution on the part of the Bush/Cheney WH surely is near the core of a deeply distorted American ME stance.

    One can imagine that by letting this deeply held American overview of ME policy formation and formulation to remain in place nearly six years after the 9/11 attack that Saudi Arabia will not be held accountable for any Saudi Arabian shortfalls regarding what Saudi Arabians are doing in Iraq.

    Saddam had no record of being involved in any support of AQ but what did that matter? Attack Iraq!

    Iran surely is being viewed through the very same skewed lens.

    Hence. Attack Iran! Saudi Arabia??What??They are our “friends” in ME.

    What do ME facts have to do with American ME policy and acts taken?

    How did the Preznit put it the other day…something about how those who attacked us on 9/11 are now in Iraq…he got that part right.

    Our Preznit… one sharp feller that one. Yep. He be one sharp feller.

  • How is that fence Saudis proposed to build on the Iraqi border coming along? (550 miles of high tech deterrent.)

  • The Bush Gang doesn’t care about the nationality of foreign fighters unless they are Iranian. And speaking of Iran, the U.S. is quietly but steadily increasing its Air Force assets next door, in Iraq – as seen here: http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/07/14/ap3914388.html .

    Bombing isn’t a particularly effective way to quell an insurgency, regardless what they might say, unless you can get a bunch of insurgents together – and these are said by experts to be mostly small cells and dispersed militia groups. Some of these are supported by the U.S., some not, and they’re pretty hard to tell apart, especially from the air. After all, the USAF sometimes can’t tell Canadian soldiers from Taliban. However, bombing is a pretty good way to take out a “suspected nuclear weapons related program activity centre”, thus touching off another war. Some of those babies, such as the Rockwell B1B, are kind of overkill for an insurgency. Dandy for taking out a reactor, though.

  • Another item to point out is that the Saudi Royal family are the financiers for the spread of Wahhabi Islam world-wide. Wahhabism, the most fundamentalist of fundamentalist versions of Islam – is the state religion of Saudi Arabia (and the foundation stone for the Saud family’s power) and the theological underpinning of all jihadist/Salafist movements.

    And these are our allies?

  • Comments are closed.