Have you seen the ‘Secure Fence Act’?

Towards the end of the legislative session, in a last-minute flurry of activity, congressional Republicans managed to pass something called the “Secure Fence Act,” which purports to authorize the construction of 700 miles of new fence along the U.S.-Mexico border. The House and Senate passed it, and the president wants to sign it.

So what’s the problem? Congress has decided it would rather play a little game with the legislation.

The White House is pleading with Congress to send over the bill authorizing 700 miles of fence on the U.S.-Mexico border so the president can sign it immediately, but Republican leaders on Capitol Hill want to wait until closer to the election and to have a public signing ceremony.

“Send us the damn bill. We’d like to autograph it,” said a senior administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to allow for more freedom to discuss politics and policy.

“Our object was to sign it last week so we can have port security and border security together and herald an effort to control all of the borders of the United States. We even had ways to talk about what we were doing at the airports,” the official said.

But congressional Republicans, convinced that they’ll need some kind of last-minute stunt to curry favor with voters, has ignored White House requests and continues to sit on a bill both chambers have already passed.

“It’s a timing issue,” an aide to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist said. “We want it signed closer to the election when folks are paying attention and those who want to take advantage of the messaging opportunity can do so.” House Republican leadership aides confirmed to the far-right Washington Times that this is their strategy.

This is all terribly silly and more than a little pathetic.

You may recall junior high civics class (or, barring that, School House Rock) on how a bill becomes a law. Congress passes legislation, they send to the White House, the president either signs it or vetoes it. If a president doesn’t respond to the bill within 10 days, the measure is “pocket vetoed.”

Except, in this case, Congress has held an already-passed bill for more than two weeks. What’s more, these geniuses who run Congress (at least for now) don’t even know where the bill is.

The bill’s actual status is somewhat murky. Calls to the House clerk’s office were referred to the House Administration Committee, and a spokeswoman was not able to say where the bill was.

[Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa)] said he has assigned his staff to track down the bill because he, too, wants to know where it stands.

The Bush administration official said the bill’s status has been explained several times, but “I for the life of me could not explain it to you.”

Can’t anybody here play this game?

Republican leaders passed this bill in September saying it was “urgent” and a matter of “national security.” Now these clowns can’t even find the bill and prefer to play a asinine game than to actually get the legislation signed into law. I talked to a source in the Senate who told me that he’d never seen Congress refuse to send a passed bill to the White House like this.

Putting all of this aside, is it a good political strategy? In other words, do Republicans actually stand to gain from an 11th-hour bill signing? I suspect now. First, Bush has said he wouldn’t hold a signing ceremony because the bill is (accurately) perceived as anti-Hispanic. Second, as conservative voters probably know, the “fence” is a bit of a joke.

No sooner did Congress authorize construction of a 700-mile fence on the U.S.-Mexico border last week than lawmakers rushed to approve separate legislation that ensures it will never be built….

Shortly before recessing late Friday, the House and Senate gave the Bush administration leeway to distribute the money to a combination of projects — not just the physical barrier along the southern border. The funds may also be spent on roads, technology and “tactical infrastructure” to support the Department of Homeland Security’s preferred option of a “virtual fence.”

….In this case, it also reflects political calculations by GOP strategists that voters do not mind the details, and that key players — including the administration, local leaders and the Mexican government — oppose a fence-only approach, analysts said.

Congressional Republicans can’t even get their own cynical demagoguery right. It’s just sad.

So, the point really is to make the release of the bill so close to the election that the MSM won’t get around to pointing out that the “fence” is a bunch of cameras to catch pictures of Mexicans crossing the border, rather than a real wall to prevent them from crossing the border.

Ah, Republican’ts. Can’t even build a fence!

  • The best part is that they have only funded about 10% of the fence that they authorized. That will about cover the survey and design. Then they can wait ’til the next election to actually fund fifty miles or so. At fifty miles per election they can get 28 years out of this.

  • Mrs. Bateman, my Civics teacher back in 10th grade, might take my A away if I didn’t point something out:

    If the president doesn’ t sign a bill within 10 days while Congress isn’t in session, it’s pocket vetoed, and Congress can’t override (because it’s not in session). If Congress is in session, the bill can pass w/o the president’s signature.

  • Any time there’s a contest between doing the right thing and doing the right PR thing, PR wins. Although, I must admit, I like Homeland Security’s idea of a “virtual fence.” Sounds like a conceptual art piece: imagine a fence, running 700 miles across all sorts of terrain where the fence can’t touch the ground….

  • The republi-thugs think they need corporate donations more than they think they need a fence, or think they need to listen to the voice of the people. They seem to believe their true constituents are their corporate donors. Their constituents/donors want that cheap labor and whatever corporate America wants, corporate America gets.

    It’s kind of a stupid law since at least 40% of the illegal immigrants enter with legal visitor visas and never go home. The fence is going to be expensive and probably will not work, but if that is the case, why pass the law in the first place? It is fun to watch the repugli-thugs crash and burn.

  • Ah, Republican’ts. Can’t even build a fence!
    Comment by Lance

    🙂 >>>>>>> 🙂

    Republican’ts build a fence.
    Republican’ts win a war.
    Republican’ts protect our children.
    Republican’ts do anything right.

    Next the Republican’ts present a plan to control hurricanes…A Cyclone Fence!

  • We want it signed closer to the election when folks are paying attention and those who want to take advantage of the messaging opportunity can do so

    Maybe Osama can announce the signing the of the bill when he sends over his usual pre-election videotape.

  • Hmmmm. So, the issue of illegal immigration is SO pressing and SO urgent that we have to wait on implementation until a more politically opportune time… sick. and pathetic.

  • Reagan to Gorbachev, 1987, regarding the Berlin Wall:
    “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!”

    Gorbachev to Bush, 2006, speaking in Texas regarding the US-Mexican fence:
    “I don’t think the U.S. is so weak and so much lacks confidence as not to be able to find a different solution”

    Oh, how the tables have turned…

  • Im beginning to sense a faint whiff of desperation in the air in the last couple of days.

    Three weeks left still. I suspect next week we will see even more deplorable, pathetic and halfbaked ideas being unleased to try and fend off the coming avalanche.

    The fence is rather symbolic, dont you think? Looks like the democractic tide will top it, not unlike the levees succumbed in New Orleans, and any fence ever built along the border is circumvented.

    Really sad stuff here…who would have thought death throes would be so enjoyable to watch, even in slow motion?

  • The media should exploit the hell out of the fact that not only did the Republican’t congress pass this silly little bill, now they can’t find it!

    Classic. They lose a bill they pushed for and said the country needed but now it seems to be misplaced.

    And they want us to trust them on National Security? They can’t even keep track of their own paperwork.

    IF the media were to grab this story, I wonder how fast that bill would re-appear??

  • I’m imagining an ad where the voiceover is saying “the Republicans want you to trust them on important complex issues like keeping track of foreign nationals entering our country. . .” while a black and white montage of some of the most pratfall-filled Keystone Cops segments runs silently. “They said they’d build a giant fence to help out. Now, however, it seems they can’t find where they put the bill” [superimpose a news article on the lost bill, but keep the Keystone Cops running in the background.] “How can they be trusted to keep track of terrorists if they can’t keep track of a piece of paper? Government shouldn’t be comedy of errors. Vote Democratic Nov. 7th.” and end with some particularly goofy Keystone Cops shot.

  • “It’s a timing issue,” an aide to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist said. “We want it signed closer to the election when folks are paying attention and those who want to take advantage of the messaging opportunity can do so.”

    That should read *former* aide to Frist — because anybody who would admit that openly is just asking to be fired immediately.

  • Further proof that too much Kool-Aid rots the brain.

    Virtual Fence? Will it be more or less effective than the Virtual Government we’ve been saddled with for the past 5 zillion years?

    The only place the GOP can go from here is for its members to stand on the Capitol steps, take a kerosene shower and then light a match. Perhaps that is Karl’s October surprise?

  • And the curtain was lifted, and then, not to the surprise of the well-informed, the idiots running the chaos were seen for what they were – Republicans! Vote the Rascals Out in ’06 and ’08! -Kevo

  • ***a spokeswoman was not able to say where the bill was.***

    The truth is that an as-yet-to-be-named individual snuck the bill over to the White House one night, and hid it under the Presidential Desk Pad on the Presidential Desk in the Oval Office. Once it’s been there long enough, it’s “pocket-vetoed by default.” And, there’s not enough time to reintroduce, re-committee, re-debate, re-authorize, re-further-debate, and re-vote on this thing. That’s not to mention the interchamber re-negotiations, the reintroductions of re-amendments, and all the other re-garbage that has to happen before it can be signed by the re-decider.

    Hey—I couldn’t help it—I just want to know if it’s true that the Reich bloggers are looking for Left-blog plots to screw up the government….

  • With luck, the d….d document will *remain* lost till past November 7 🙂

    Virtual Fence? Like, made of Internet tubes?

    Dale, @#6. Yes, I know… Irresistible. But I visited Auschwitz at the tender age of 14 and words like “Cyclone” and “Fence”, when in close proximity, still make me heave 43yrs later. So, please…

  • Comments are closed.