Historical US Mortality Rate

Guest post by Ed Stephan

Last Thursday we here at TCR began some discussion of possible (probable?) future pandemics. In one comment I mentioned that the U.S. long-term mortality rates are represented by a gradually declining straight line, reflecting slight improvements in mortality throughout the 20th century. I couldn’t add the graph to that comment, but I can here.

The really dramatic mortality decreases occurred during previous centuries, with the introduction of scientific agriculture, exemplified in the published work of Jethro Tull in the 1730s. There he recommended such practices as row-planting, soil pulverization with improved plows, selective breeding, barns for the wintering of livestock, turnips and clover as winter fodder, soil enrichment (nitrogen, calcium, phosphates, manure). Widely adopted by aristocrat/farmers who “enclosed” their estates (meaning they tossed the peasants off), these practices led to a dramatic increase in the protein diets of ordinary people and, with that, to a dramatic decrease in infant mortality.

In the next century a number of public health programs (sewage management, city zoning, public water supply systems) led to still further, if less dramatic, declines. In the 20th century, beginning with the introduction of sulfa drugs in the 1930s, medicine made modest gains in still further reducing mortality.

The US began gathering national data on births and deaths in 1909 (the system of data gathering was complete by 1933). This is the mortality graph I mentioned last Thursday. Breaking from my usual practice of downloading the data and creating my own (I plead having been much busier than usual of late), I’m borrowing this ready-made from Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: Trends in the Health of Americans During the 20th Century, where you can find all sorts of graphs of births and birth rates, maternal and infant morality rates, and a a host of other exciting Demographic matters.

As you can see, military deaths from WWI and WWII are not even noticeable. The up-spike in the solid line is the 1918 worldwide Spanish flu pandemic. Unlike the flus we’re used to, this one struck all ages, particularly healthy men and women in their 30s. Something our leaders ought to think about as they ponder possible future problems. An additional difficulty, today, is the ease with which a very small number of researchers can now create the agents which cause diseases.

If you ever want to see how different life was, and how we hope it will never be again, go find some American big city newspapers from the 1918 epidemic. Look at the page after page of small type death notices from the flu – day after day. Totally shocking. Makes 9/11 seem like a hiccup.

  • 9/11 is indeed a hiccup. Over 55 million
    people die every year from all causes around
    the world, about 2 million in this country. Why
    do some deaths count so much more than
    others? See another of Ed’s postings below.
    Why do we enshrine the 9/11 victims as
    national heroes, and ignore so many
    others? I’ll never understand this. Don’t
    the 40,000 slaughtered on our highways
    count? The 400,000 killed by tobacco?
    The nearly 20,000 murder victims? The
    nearly 30,000 deaths from shootings?
    How about aids? The homeless wasting
    away? Other diseases? The neglected?

    On another issue, Ed’s graphs show a
    marked improvement in mortality rates
    over the past quarter century, but as a
    former, retired actuary, I can assure you
    that the biggest contributor has not been
    modern medicine, but the American
    people quitting the smoking habit.
    It cannot be overstated how lethal smoking
    is.

    We’re still subsidizing the tobacco farmers.
    It wouldn’t take much work to save more lives
    in one month by a sensible national tobacco
    policy than were killed in 9/11, and is costing
    us hundreds of billions of dollars to prevent
    from happening again, and is so unlikely to
    occur, on that scale, if we did nothing at all.
    It has never occurred anywhere else in human
    history. I still wonder why there is no uproar
    about why those buildings collapsed. You would
    think, with three major airports in the area,
    that the possibility of an accidental collision
    would have required special construction
    codes for skyscrapers, as there are in
    Los Angeles, for example, for earthquakes. Why doesn’t
    anyone ask the right questions in this
    country?

    There is just no intelligence left in this nation
    of ours, no common sense, no direction,
    no leadership, no national goals, no
    vision, no aspirations, nothing. Nothing
    but a giant food fight.

  • Those buildings collapsed because the structural support beams wered not coated in asbestos. When the big scare about asbestos occurred, the sprayed-on asbestos which coated all structural members of V.A, Medical Centers was removed at a cost of millions of dollars, and was replaced by nothing else, because nothing else was as effective. The only thing which would have prevented those buildings from collapsing would have been to have all sructural steel supports coated with asbestos. Nothing else would have prevented the structural steel from melting and buckling in those buildings due to the extremely high heat generated from tons of jet fuel being burned. Closeness of airports have nothing to do with the construction of those buildings. The only other case of an alircraft hitting a building was when an Air Force B-25, lost in the fog, flew into the side of the Empire State Building over 50 years ago, with minimal damage to the Empire State Building. The entire crew of the B-25 died. Incidenetally, up until the 1950’s, there were no earthquake proof buildings in California. Not all buildings built after that were earthquake-proof. Older buildings which were extensively damaged by earthquakes ager that were ususlly of earthquake-proof construction.
    I agree with you about highway deaths, over 17,000 killed every year by drunk drivers, and thousands killed every year because of ignoring speed limits and running red lights.

  • With your comment regarding the “Spanish Flu” pandemic, the demographics work out that way because of the millions of soldiers and refugees were crammed into tight quarters-there were no flu or anti-viral immunizations available, and all of the soldiers were between 18-30 years of age. Also many medical personnel contracted it from their patients as did two of my ancestors who were medical doctors.

  • Comments are closed.