Five months ago, [tag]Department of Homeland Security[/tag] Secretary [tag]Michael Chertoff[/tag] said his agency had finally changed the way in which it distributes federal [tag]grants [/tag]to states and localities. Whereas the old system relied on a bizarre proportional method in which smaller states (and less likely [tag]terrorist [/tag][tag]targets[/tag]) got far more funding than needed, Chertoff said this year’s grants would be risk-based and consistent with [tag]common sense[/tag].
What do you know, the Department of Homeland Security’s decisions can get worse.
The Department of Homeland Security yesterday slashed anti-terrorism money for [tag]Washington [/tag]and [tag]New York[/tag], part of an immediately controversial decision to reduce grant funds for major urban areas in the Northeast while providing more to mid-size cities from Jacksonville to Sacramento.
The announcement that the two cities targeted on Sept. 11, 2001, would suffer 40 percent reductions in urban security funds prompted outrage from lawmakers and local officials in both areas, who questioned the wisdom of cutting funds so deeply for cities widely recognized as prime terrorist targets. […]
In addition to Washington and New York, the grant decisions included a 46 percent drop for San Diego, where several of the Sept. 11 hijackers lived; a 61 percent decrease for Phoenix, where an FBI agent suspected that terrorists were taking flight training; and a 30 percent reduction for Boston, the point of origin of the two jetliners that crashed into the World Trade Center.
New York City will not only get considerably less money, but a risk scorecard for the city created by the Department of Homeland Security concluded that the home of the Statue of Liberty, Empire State Building, and Brooklyn Bridge has “zero” national monuments or icons.
George Foresman, DHS’s Undersecretary for Preparedness, told reporters that it’s not just about terrorism; grants are also intended to improve readiness for “an act of Mother Nature.” With this in mind, it’s worth noting that [tag]New Orleans[/tag]’ grants for security and disaster preparedness were also cut in half.
I have exceedingly low expectations for the [tag]Bush[/tag] [tag]administration[/tag]’s [tag]competence[/tag] and judgment, but once in a while, they manage to surprise me.