House conservatives smacked around on Voting Rights Act

I noted on Wednesday that a rebellious group of about 80 House Republicans were threatening to derail reauthorization of the [tag]Voting Rights Act[/tag] because they opposed bilingual ballots in some districts and they were “offended” by federal oversight of voting in districts that “were notorious for institutionalized acts of racism, such as adopting laws designed to prevent blacks from voting.”

This was more than just a symbolic protest; these conservatives, nearly all of whom are from the South, threatened to derail the entire bill. Yesterday, they got smacked around pretty thoroughly.

The [tag]House[/tag] yesterday easily approved an extension of key provisions of the landmark Voting Rights Act, after GOP leaders quelled a rebellion within the party’s Southern ranks that threatened to become a political embarrassment.

Before the 390 to 33 vote to extend the measure for a quarter-century, the House defeated four amendments that would have diluted two expiring provisions and possibly derailed final passage before the November congressional elections. With the House hurdle now cleared, Senate Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) said he hoped to bring the extension to the Senate floor before the August recess.

House Dems, and fortunately, top GOP leaders, said in no uncertain terms that the Voting Rights Act would be renewed without alteration. It’s worth remembering, however, that there were four poison-pill amendments pushed by hard-line VRA critics — and some of those amendments were supported by a majority of House Republicans.

The roll call vote for the final bill is online here. You can also see the vote breakdown on the Norwood Amendment (which would have limited affected jurisdictions), Gohmert Amendment (which would have caused the VRA to expire in just 10 years), King Amendment (on bilingual ballots), and Westmoreland Amendment (which would have made it harder for the feds to keep monitoring problematic communities).

Also remember, despite the margin of victory in the House, it appears some of the [tag]Senate[/tag]’s most conservative Southerners are poised to raise the same objections. Yesterday was encouraging, but there’s one more chamber to go — and a handful of GOP southerners are hinting at a filibuster. Stay tuned.

please please please please please filibuster this bill!!! That would be the perfect election year gift.

  • Ah, Westmoreland. Has NO ONE told him that after Colbert he should keep his head down. Americans know who he is, what a twit he is, and he is just reinforcing that.

    Republican’ts, Can’t keep idiots like Westmoreland out of Congress.

  • Hey CB,

    The “King Amendment” link links to the vote tally for the “Gohmert Amendment.”

  • Well, my boy Wolf only voted wrong once. Not too bad, I suppose, for a Southern Republican’t. Tom Davis, amazingly, was on the right side of every vote and Jo Ann Davis, of Christmas Tree Protection fame, couldn’t even be bothered to show up for the vote. What’s her excuse, I wonder?

  • The “King Amendment” link links to the vote tally for the “Gohmert Amendment.”

    Good catch. It’s fixed.

  • Aside from glee at GOP infighting, will the oversight provisions of the VRA also address vote theft and electoral shenanigans such as in Ohio 2004?

  • And people wonder why I call these white-supremacist white trash descendants of transported felons “sixth-generation traitors.”

    Goddamn Confederate traitor scum is what they are.

  • Don’t hold back Tom, tell us what you really feel.

    You think they are bad, imagine having the dude-range confed-wannabe George Felix Allen Jr. as your junior senator!

  • dude-range confed-wannabe George Felix Allen Jr. ??????????

    maybe dude-RANCH?

    Actually, I just love repeating George Felix Allen Jr.!

  • Apparently one of the things they found objectionable in the VRA was the continued need for Federal review of those states which were historically opposed to the VRA. According to opponents, the South has changed: Boss Hogg and the boys have grown up, racial prejudice and discrimination is “gone with the wind”, etc. I guess this vote, along with continuing efforts to block equal voting rights for all, proves what a bunch of horseshit (okay, weasel shit) that argument is.

  • Ah, Ed Stephan has put the Southerners into a Catch 22 (or a Morton’s Fork) situation. If they oppose the renewal of the VRA, it proves they need to have it; if they support the VRA, they still get it.

    But as he also points out, the Florida 2000 vote, where African-Americans were detained, without arrest and charge, during the election day and the current effort of Georgia to require photo IDs that poor African-Americans in Atlantia can’t easily get, both kind of prove that voter intimidation and access denial is still practiced in the South.

  • Morton’s Fork, for you how don’t know, was named for Bishop Morton, the tax collector for Henry VII and the slanderer who claimed that Richard III had done away with his nephews. Morton would go around the country, and encountering a small, run down property, would go to the owner and say “You live very meanly. You must have a lot saved. How about a bit for the King?” When he found a large, well maintained property, he would go to the owner and say “You live quite well. You must have a lot of income. How about a bit for the King?”

  • The Republicans are showing their lovely colors again. What else should we expect from that crew anyway? Southern Republicans are again demonstrating their racist roots.

  • Of course, this means that we will be battling the discrimination that occurred in 1964 rather than any discrimination that might be occurring in elections today. After all, teh basis upon which states are covered is what happened in the 1964 presidential election.

    So if there was a 50% turnout in your state or county in 1964, you are free and clear — even if you only get a 40% turnout today.

    http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/186077.php

  • “My” representative, Goodlate, voted “right” (ie wrong) every time, which was to be expected. But, why did he run un-opposed the last time? I hope Dean’s “seed *all* states” principle will pay off, by and by…

    Like some other commenters before me, I was happy to see all the “ammendments” (quote marks on purpose; after all, they didn’t try to make anything *better*) slapped down, with some bi-partisan effort. But, I’d have liked even more, to see the law adjusted for current reality and some more states brought under federal supervision. Actually… I wouldn’t have minded to see *all* of them having their voting practices peered at carefully 🙂

  • Comments are closed.