How a bill isn’t supposed to become a law

This story has kind of been simmering just below the surface for a few weeks, but it’s pretty interesting. It deals with a legislative typo — generally not fascinating stuff — but it also speaks to some of the major issues in politics right now, most notably Republican incompetence and willingness to cut corners.

Washington threw all that old-fashioned civics stuff into a tizzy, when President Bush signed into law a bill that actually never passed the House. Bill — in this case, a major budget-cutting measure that will affect millions of Americans — became a law because it was “certified” by the leaders of the House and Senate.

It’s pretty basic — the House and Senate pass the same bill, the president signs it, it’s a law. In this case, the House and Senate passed slightly different bills, including a $2 billion dollar Medicare mistake, Republicans decided it was close enough, and Bush signed it. Is it a law? A couple of new lawsuits say it isn’t.

The budget typo that sparked partisan barbs earlier this year is now attracting the attention of more lawyers. Two new legal actions question the constitutional validity of the $39 billion deficit-reduction bill that President Bush signed in February.

Public Citizen filed a lawsuit yesterday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking to nullify the law. On Friday, 15 Tennessee hospitals involved in a decade-long dispute with Medicare filed a memorandum with the same court calling the bill unconstitutional.

Legal scholars seem to believe that the action was a fairly obvious violation of the Constitution and that lawmakers have little choice but to start over. Republicans don’t want to.

It’s par for the course with GOP officials lately. They write legislation in secret, they throw the rules out the window, and they ignore legal concerns. What’s more, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) believes the president may have known the bill he was signing wasn’t legitimate while he was signing it. This prompted Digby to note, “I’m beginning to think they are actively trying to destroy the Constitution just for the hell of it.” Given what we’ve seen, it’s a reasonable suspicion.

But it also plays into the competence meme that’s dominated political discussions of late. Republicans control the House, Senate, and White House, they agree on all of the details for a sweeping spending bill, but they can’t even get it through the legislative process without screwing it up.

Can’t anybody here play this game?

Who exactly is it that trusts the Republicans with any level of Government?

  • “I’m beginning to think they are actively trying to destroy the Constitution just for the hell of it.”

    There’s no reason to suppose an organized plot when ordinary stupidity will do. Both will ultmately destroy the Constitution of our nation, and GOP stupidity rrequires less knowledge and effort.

  • So – what’s the next step. If the court decides for the plaintiffs, and Congress still ignores?

    Supreme Court – and if the Supreme Court rules in favor of plaintiffs and Congress CONTINUES to ignore?

    How much longer can this go on? What else can Bush screw up in the next 1000+ days.

  • the GOP needs to spend an afternoon watching those old Schoolhouse Rock cartoons on how the US government is SUPPOSED to be run.

  • so are we in the posistion where we just hope they do something right by sheer accident? i mean i really hope when balence is restored that these idiots are held accountable so people learn that what they did was wrong

  • My father-in-law once argued that a dictatorship is far more efficient than the kind of republic we have today. It was much like what Bush said a few years ago with respect to his sentiments about dictatorships.

    I’m realizing now that a dictatorship is only possible due to corruption. The dictator, unless he is an idiot, has to secure the cooperation of the formal and informal power bases in the society in order to control all the rest of the people. And these power brokers won’t give absolute power to another person for free. But corruption, because of the political dynamics involved, creates the kind of inefficiency that we’re witnessing right now.

    My postulate: the more absolute power we give the President (any president, not just Bush), the more inefficient and ineffective government will become due to corruption.

  • Very good point, Mr. Flibble, and I would add that a corrupt and incompetent dictatorship can only be sustained by increasing repression of the population. They go hand in hand and cannot exist without each other.

    Secret police, silencing of independent media, destroying or marginalizing dissenting voices, eliminating access to information……we’re seeing it happen all around us, right out in the open.

    Whether you call it the Okrana, the NKVD, the Stasi, the Gestapo, the KGB or the Republican National Committee, the hallmarks are always the same, and they’re happening to us right now.

    Time for the rest of the country to wake up and make some serious changes before things get even more ugly.

  • They did this because they did not want to have to go on the record again cutting college aid, Medicare, etc.

  • Secret police, silencing of independent media, destroying or marginalizing dissenting voices, eliminating access to information……we’re seeing it happen all around us, right out in the open.—Comment by Curmudgeon

    It is nice to have this forum because it is not a good experience to believe that you are the only one thinking these thoughts. Without the internet, we would really be in trouble. Speaking of that I heard on Ed Schultz (yesterday or the day before) as I was driving home that there is a bill just introduced in the House to silence partisan blogs for sixty days before an election. Does anyone know anything about that? I hope it is a rumor. Things are really getting wierd.

  • Comments are closed.