How Blackwater works — and the State Department doesn’t

After the stunning Sept. 16 incident at Nisoor Square, it appeared Blackwater’s reputation couldn’t get much worse. For that matter, the State Department’s oversight of its private army couldn’t get much more embarrassing.

As it turns out, though, both assumptions are mistaken.

Last Feb. 7, a sniper employed by Blackwater USA, the private security company, opened fire from the roof of the Iraqi Justice Ministry. The bullet tore through the head of a 23-year-old guard for the state-funded Iraqi Media Network, who was standing on a balcony across an open traffic circle. Another guard rushed to his colleague’s side and was fatally shot in the neck. A third guard was found dead more than an hour later on the same balcony.

Eight people who responded to the shootings — including media network and Justice Ministry guards and an Iraqi army commander — and five network officials in the compound said none of the slain guards had fired on the Justice Ministry, where a U.S. diplomat was in a meeting. An Iraqi police report described the shootings as “an act of terrorism” and said Blackwater “caused the incident.” The media network concluded that the guards were killed “without any provocation.”

The State Department was, of course, responsible for looking into the shootings, and holding the shooters accountable. So, what happened? Blackwater guards said they acted in self defense, and that was good enough for the administration officials on the ground.

As the WaPo reported, “Neither U.S. Embassy officials nor Blackwater representatives interviewed witnesses or returned to the network, less than a quarter-mile from Baghdad’s Green Zone, to investigate.”

When Condoleezza Rice told lawmakers recently that her State Department was responsible for overseeing the security company, this is an example of how well her agency was meeting its responsibilities.

As for Iraqis, we keep getting a better sense of why the whole “hearts and minds” problem isn’t getting any better.

U.S. officials and the security company, now known as Blackwater Worldwide, offered no compensation or apology to the victims’ families, according to relatives of the guards and officials of the network, whose programming reaches 22 million Iraqis.

“It’s really surprising that Blackwater is still out there killing people,” Mohammed Jasim, the Iraqi Media Network’s deputy director, said in an interview. “This company came to Iraq and was supposed to provide security. They didn’t learn from their mistakes. They continued and continued. They continued killing.”

Ahmed Thamir Abood, an Iraqi Army captain with jurisdiction over the area, arrived on the scene to talk to Blackwater guards. It didn’t go well.

“I told them, ‘I want to speak with the guy who is in charge of this unit,’ ” he said.

The Blackwater guards started toying with him, Abood said.

“He’s in charge,” said one, pointing at one of his colleagues.

“No, he’s in charge,” said another.

“They didn’t care what I was saying,” Abood said.

It’s quite an operation we have going over there, isn’t it?

Who knew that BushCo really meant it is better to have sociopathic Blackwater thugs killing people there so we don’t have them killing people here?

  • U.S. officials and the security company, now known as Blackwater Worldwide, offered no compensation or apology to the victims’ families, according to relatives of the guards and officials of the network, whose programming reaches 22 million Iraqis.

    Murderers rarely apologize for their murders and never, as far as I know, voluntarily pay compensation to the families. Hell, if OJ is exonerated in criminal court and found guilty in civil court and then had to pay compensation, he didn’t pay it voluntarily. Even in his book he didn’t apologize for the murders.

    Eric Prince, as their boss, ought to be prosecuted for war crimes.

  • Gee, I wonder if killing three employees at the Iraqi Media Network will improve our image?

    Ranks right up there with letting the national museum get looted.

    I’d say the first thing that needs to happen is we find a replacement for Blackwater, post haste. Congress should defund those assholes NOW.

  • Not sure how accurate this is, but if it is it’s interesting:

    All in the (Crime) Family: Bush & Blackwater

    Like a cancer, private mercenary firm spreads influence in local communities. When the private military company Blackwater USA, a firm tied to the Bush family through marriage and to right-wing extremist and racist groups through politics and money, established its headquarters in Moyock, North Carolina in an former military reservation in the Great Dismal Swamp, just south of the Virginia border, practically no one noticed.

    Blackwater was founded in 1997 by Erik Prince, a former US Navy SEAL and right-wing fundamentalist Christian from Michigan. Prince’s father is Edgard Prince, who founded the Family Research Council with Gary Bauer. Erik Prince’s sister is Betty DeVos, who is married to Dick DeVos, the son of Amway co-founder and Mormon bigwig Richard DeVos. The General Counsel for Erik Prince’s Blackwater parent company, the Prince Group, is Joseph Schmitz, the Pentagon’s former Inspector General. Schmitz’s brother, John Schmitz, Jr. deputy counsel to George H. W. Bush and who is married to the sister of Columba Bush, Jeb Bush’s wife.

    The father of John and Joseph was extreme right-wing Republican Congressman John Schmitz, Sr. Their sister is Mary Kay Letourneau, a former Washington State schoolteacher jailed for having sex with a thirteen year old American Samoan student who she later married…

    http://rinf.com/alt-news/business-news/all-in-the-crime-family-bush-blackwater/1595/

  • I take pause when I read this story about the sniper. First, because it’s all eye witness accounts. Police investigators today all but discount eye witnesses. Not necessarily because they’re dishonest, but because people think they see things that in fact they have not. (The case of Jean Charles de Menezes being shot on the London Underground is a good case of this.)

    Second, I pause because Blackwater stands by their work. Two years ago they ASKED the State Department to install cameras in all their vehicles; they believe a video record will bear out their version of events. (Incidentally, State turned down the request, so we still don’t have much evidence about what goes on in Iraq. See http://blackblawg.blogspot.com/2007/10/state-department-denied-blackwaters.html.)

    Finally, a note on Blackwater’s contract with the State Department. While trawling the blogosphere I recently came across someone rhetorically asking ‘Who drives against traffic in a traffic circle?’ A fair question. The State Department contract with Blackwater, which is about 1,000 pages long and extensively detailed, stipulate that State Department convoys travel quickly and drive aggressively. Furthermore, no State Department official ever travels with less than three vehicles and they’re always the biggest stuff they can find, with those obnoxious “Warning: Stay Back” signs and all of that.

    This is in contrast to the CIA, which drives around Baghdad and other parts of Iraq, with contract security, all the time, but doesn’t run into trouble. Why? Because they’re riding in unmarked beat-up pickups and following traffic patterns. The difference, surprisingly, is not the contractors – both employ them – but the agency that hires them and the terms of the contracts.

    It’s sad to think that the State Department officially has the lead for public diplomacy. Who most heavily opposed the State Department terms under which Blackwater is employed? The Department of Defense (which also employs contractors, but again, under different terms), folks who actually know a thing or two about public diplomacy, even though it’s not their primary duty.

    The State Department contract also stipulated that diplomatic security guards must wear wrap-around sunglasses (a cultural faux pas in the Arabic world) and prohibited facial hair (another cultural faux pas). Just what were these State Department boys learning at Georgetown?

    Lest you think I’m making this up, the Christian Science Monitor recently ran a story along similar lines. It’s definitely worth reading: http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1102/p09s01-coop.html.

  • what were these State Department boys learning at Georgetown?

    nothing. they were probably all at Regent or Liberty.

  • Aaron R. Linderman

    Police investigators today all but discount eye witnesses.

    Well, no, they don’t. Depending on the circumstances, they check out these accounts, and if everybody tells the same story, they’ve no choice but to credit them. And in this case, it’s the State Department defending Blackwater, telling the story they tell to defend themselves, and the State Department is hardly a reputable defense agency for Blackwater. You can see why State’s defending them, though. If Blackwater is guilty, so is the State Department for sending them in.

    But the Iraqis won’t buy it because they know the Bush administration has lied repeatedly to cover the murder and torture of innocents in Iraq.

    Blackwater forces are not the “good guys” in Iraq, nor in California, nor in New Orleans. They work for the Bush administration in illegal ventures, and that’s all that needs to be said.

  • Well then, if Blackwater isn’t doing anything wrong, they should have nothing to fear when the Iraqi government starts going after security forces to make sure they are in compliance with Iraq’s restrictions on firearms allowed, right?
    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/08/world/middleeast/08ministry.html

    Also, once the Iraqi government officially removes the immunity clause that has kept private security firms from facing prosecution, it won’t affect Blackwater and their operatives, since they aren’t doing anything illegal.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/31/world/middleeast/31iraq.html?em&ex=1193976000&en=479ea4d002e41f50&ei=5087

    Yep, “Hakuna Matata”, Blackwater.

  • I have the rest of the transcript:

    Abood: ‘I want to speak with the guy who is in charge of this unit,’

    C. Howard : “He’s in charge,”

    L. Fine : “No, he’s in charge,”

    M. Howard: “Why I oughta…”

    C, Howard: “WoooWoooWoooWooo”

  • I obviously can’t support Blackwater in these allegations if in fact they are true, but think of an Iraq without Blackwater. They make up over 50% of American combat personnel in the country. The remaining military would be much more open to attack if Blackwater wasn’t there. Despite what people want to believe, Blackwater is not just a security firm. They are actively engaged in military style operations all over the region. We need to pull everyone out, this way the potential absence of Blackwater won’t harm those troops in uniform left to fight.

  • I’ll call your “send them to Gitmo,” George—and raise you a “put them UNDER Gitmo….”

  • Comments are closed.