‘How the Holy-Rollers and the Neo-Cons Destroyed the GOP’

Yesterday, the big story was Matthew Dowd, the first member of Bush’s inner circle to break ranks and denounce the president.

Today, it’s Vic Gold. He’s not exactly a West Wing insider, but he’s close.

Vic Gold heard from Lynne Cheney a few weeks before George W. Bush was sworn in as president in January 2001. Cheney had an assignment for her old friend: She wanted Gold to write the profiles of her and her husband, the new vice president, for the official Inauguration program.

The veteran journalist and GOP campaign operative was a natural choice. After all, he had shared an office with Lynne Cheney at Washingtonian magazine before she became chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities — and they even worked on a satirical novel together.

Gold was also an old friend of the new president’s father, having worked with George H.W. Bush on his campaigns and co-written his autobiography. The association dated back to 1964, when Bush 41 was an unsuccessful Senate candidate in Texas and Gold a press assistant to unsuccessful presidential candidate Barry Goldwater.

So Gold was also asked to write the official bios of the new president and first lady. “With Texas deep in his heart, America’s 43rd president is an optimistic man of faith and family,” he proclaimed in the program.

Gold was equally effusive about Dick Cheney : “A man of gravitas with a quick and easy wit; a conservative who’ll see a road less traveled; a political realist who sees his country and the world around him not in terms of leaden problems but golden opportunities.”

That was then. Now, Gold’s written a book. It’s called, “Invasion of the Party Snatchers: How the Holy-Rollers and the Neo-Cons Destroyed the GOP.”

Under Bush and Cheney, he argues, the GOP has moved away from principles of small government, prudent foreign policy and leaving people alone to live their private lives — all views Gold associates with his hero, Goldwater. “Invasion of the Party Snatchers” makes plain Gold’s contempt for the direction of his party and the guidance of its leaders.

“For all the Rove-built facade of his being a ‘strong’ chief executive, George W. Bush has been, by comparison to even hapless Jimmy Carter, the weakest, most out of touch president in modern times,” Gold writes. “Think Dan Quayle in cowboy boots.”

Gold is even more withering in his observations of Cheney. “A vice president in control is bad enough. Worse yet is a vice president out of control.”

For Gold, Cheney brings to mind the adage of Swiss writer Madame de Stael, who wrote, “Men do not change, they unmask themselves.” Cheney has a deep streak of paranoia and megalomania, Gold suggests — but he says he did not see it at first.

“He was hiding who he really was,” Gold says. “He was waiting for an opportunity.”

First, it’ll be interesting to see how Bush’s followers manage to smear a long-time GOP insider.

Second, the list of Bush confidants who are now willing to acknowledge how dangerous this White House is keeps getting longer, doesn’t it?

*Sigh

Close the barn door…the horses have escaped.

  • Slouching towards Cheney’s 18%….

    The true dead-enders…
    The “who gives a fuck”
    And…
    “Go fuck yourself” crowd.

    The true true true believers…
    Who wear their ass-hats with pomp and pride…
    And toast each other with purple kool aid…
    Salud!
    Drink it deep brother!
    The 18% of humanity every psychopath knows you can always count on…

    Where would the Adolfs and Benitos be without them?

    Heil America!
    Heil Cheney!
    Heil Christianity!

    And so they go… slouching towards Baghdad.

  • โ€œA man of gravitas with a quick and easy wit;”

    Gravitas = A big fat ass.
    Quick and easy wit = GFY.

    The clue bus is a bit crowded Mr. Gold, you’ll have to walk.

  • First, itโ€™ll be interesting to see how Bushโ€™s followers manage to smear a long-time GOP insider.

    They’ll call him a “partisan Democrat” like they always do.

  • “Dan Quayle in cowboy boots”?

    Isn’t that an insult to morons?

    Well, all these guys should be used by the right as proof that people like me who call them neofascists and such are ‘alarmists,” since if the fascists really were in control, guys like Gold would be hanged with baling wire from meat hooks. We’re not there yet so obviously I am overwrought.

  • I think Mr. Gold has it ass-backwards.

    The Republican’t party sold a bill of goods to Evangelicals, claiming that they and only they could undo all the terrible liberal damage of the 60’s and 70’s (drugs, sex and abortion). Have they done anything?

    Well, Sandra Day O’Connor modified Roe vs. Wade so that you could actually regulate late term abortions. All you need is an exception for the life and health of the mother.

    Beyond that, what exactly have Republican’ts actually achieved for their “Base”?

    Now the Neo-Cons, they are destroying the GOP ๐Ÿ˜‰

    But are they more to blame for the sad state of the party then Rove and DeLay?

  • Boy, these Republicans are really coming out of the closet in droves all of a sudden. Can’t swing a dead cat without hitting a book written by some former insider turned truth-teller.

    Maybe next Bush’s dad will finally blow. You know he’s gotta want to at some level. ๐Ÿ™‚

    But this guy Gold, WTF was he thinking for the last several years?

    The war was a big factor [in prompting him to go public with his disillusionment]. It seemed to Gold to run counter to the traditionally conservative notion of keeping clear of foreign entanglements. He was infuriated by Bush-Cheney moves to augment executive power. And he was disgusted by the Terri Schiavo episode, which to this old libertarian seemed emblematic of a modern GOP takeover by religious zealots.

    “I really came to the conclusion that there was a threat to our system, to our way of life, and it was coming from those I thought were my people.”

    The Terri Schiavo incident really pissed him off. The Iraq war pissed him off. The BushCo power grabs pissed him off. And he finally figures out that this might be a threat to our democracy NOW?

    WTF dude? You’re an intellectual? And you’re just now getting around to saying something about this gang of criminals you showered praise upon?

    Thanks for the book, but you’re no intellectual. The smart people saw this train wreck a long time before you did.

  • Ahh, the humans leaving the sinking ship — let us not slander and defame actual rats — pleading how they just couldn’t see what vile scum Master Bushwah and Clinking Cheney were — so how come the rest of us could?

    Couldn’t have some thing to do with being blinded by an unwholesome lust for power, could it? Not noticing what a minion of the undead Dick Cheney was? Not when there’s a profit of some sort you can get by ignoring what’s on the end of that unpleasant spoon (when you dine with the devil, etc)

    My point — gonna take a hellovalot more than a simple “Scuse me” to get off the hook. jesus might accept that sort of apology, but we will not.

    How about 6 figures of dead and maimed.

    Scooter and Dowd and Vic Gold — the inner circle is walking on eggs with these guys because they know that THESE GUYS KNOW the horror stories… hell, they’ve been destroying reputations for Bushwah all along, think they can’t do it to the boss?

    Like a loyal Republican US Attorney fired for no reason MIGHT just be willing to expose THAT dirty deal to the public.

    Bad cess to all of them .. too late to repent .. the time to do that was BEFORE killing all those people.

  • I like the “in control – out of control” line. That’s pretty good.

    As for the “True Believers” I don’t think anyone really supports Bush or Cheney anymore. Remember, these are people who insist that the perception of reality is more important than reality itself. I mean, they insist that we’re traitors, simply for acknowledging what’s really happening in the world. And so why should we expect them to admit the truth about their disapproval of Bush? It just comes down to a cost-benefit analysis on whether it’s better for them to toss Bush overboard or not. The worse he does, the more they’ll have nothing to lose by tossing him.

    And for most Bushies, it never was about supporting him, but about attacking us. They supported him when it hurt us, and they’ll leave him if it hurts their war against us. They believed and said what they needed to say, and they always will.

  • Once again, though, no one should buy into this incompetence dodge being pushed by the likes of Gold. Bush and Cheney have done exactly what “conservatives” and republicans have been clamoring for for years. These asshats are now merely trying to separate Bush and Cheney from them now that the policies that they have all in lockstep pushed for and supported have failed. Bush and Cheney are the GOP. These clowns are merely trying to rehab their own reputations by trying to say that things would have worked if only we had competents leading the White House. Bullshite. Someone needs to call shenanigans on these frauds.

  • The Republicans exist solely for the Chamber of Commerce. That Republicans mismanage all they touch is a great case for the free market. Not.

  • The Republicans exist solely for the Chamber of Commerce. That Republicans mismanage all they touch is a great case for the free market. Not.

    As someone who believes in the free-market system, let me tell you that you’ve got it all wrong. Republicans exist solely to help those who help the Republicans. It’s all about working for the team. But they don’t support the free market. Take their no-bid contracts (please). That’s entirely against the free-market system and was designed solely as a means to bilk the taxpayers to get them to fund the Republicans. They don’t support free enterprise. They support monopolies crushing all competition; just as long as the monopoly is their monopoly. They don’t believe in the merit system. They just want to reward their fellow team members. And hell, that’s one reason why they’re doing so badly. Because they refuse to hire people based on merit or to allow the markets to do what they’re supposed to do. And again, that’s against the free-market system.

    So if anything, Republicans serve as a huge example of why the free-market system works. “Free market” doesn’t really mean that anything goes, because that would include things that completely undermine the markets; like nepotism, corruption, and fraud. Free markets need a level playing field and to be allowed to sort themselves out; not to have a small group of people decide for us which companies are worthy and which people are allowed to have freedoms denied to everyone else. Republicans may espouse the free-market system, but they’re all Stalinists underneath.

    As for Gold, he’s either lying or is one of the suckers who has bought into the lies that they use to justify their corrupt plans. And after having read those glowing write-ups of Bush and Cheney, I’m guessing it’s the former. But all the same, it means they’re both screwed. But seeing as how neither Bush or Cheney are really the head of the movement, this is far from over. They might be getting thrown overboard, but the boat is clearly still sailing on.

  • I agree with Saintperle… these are just vermin abandoning a sinking ship. But especially Dowd… who is a traitor to both parties now… Further, he has helped to foist on us the most corrupt, incompetent, larcenous, and morally bankrupt administration we have known since Harding. And now he wants to bail when things get bad for the Republicans.

    Democrats… do not celebrate his betrayal of the Bush administration. Dowd should be permanently exiled and isolated from all political activity…

  • Regardless of the pandering to the christo-fascists and the neocons, small government (traditional) conservativism does NOT work in the 21th century when you are a super power on the world stage. True conservatism might be found in Canada where isolationism is possible and the limited government power and low taxation logically follow. Small government is only possible with isolationism.

  • Mr Gold…

    …Did you like the way they rigged the vote to gain and stay in power in 2000, 2002, and 2004.

    …everything else sort of pales by comparison do’nt ‘cha think?

  • The Terri Schiavo incident really pissed him off. The Iraq war pissed him off. The BushCo power grabs pissed him off. And he finally figures out that this might be a threat to our democracy NOW? — Racerx, @7

    Easy, easy, relax… ๐Ÿ™‚ It takes longer to write a book than to write a bit of frou-frou for the inaugural program. He’s speaking out now, because he’s finished his book now and wants to peddle it. No mystery there.

  • i am willing to give Mr Gold, even more than Mr Dowd, a certain benefit of the doubt. i rather suspect his basic premise is sincere – he was a Goldwater Republican, after all. i know a great many R’s who greatly dislike the Theocrats (and many have joined the uncreatively named Republican Leadership Council in an effort to move the party to the center). Gold seems to me to be like many older Rs who were caught in a bit of a bind: they liked Bush 41 personally, and really could not imagine that 43 fell as far from the tree as it seemed. And they were students of Reagan’s 11th Commandment. And they certainly didn’t like the alternatives: Clinton, Gore, even Kerry – all people on the “wrong side” of the 60s and 70s for people like Gold. So they didn’t want to complain, assuming the “Holy Rollers and Neo Cons” would either be a brief phase or be relatively harmless. But the damage went on, and on, getting worse and worse. Each of them will have a different breaking point – Scowcroft bailed on Jr. quite early, and others along the way. . . and now Gold.

    Dont get me wrong, i dont excuse them (they were, after all, Rethugs to begin with of whatever stripe), nor do i excuse their aiding and abetting the biggest disaster of an administration in our history. but i do think with Gold it is more than just opportunism. i think a lot of friends of 41 have faced quite a dilemma as, to their horror, they’ve realized that 43 is an incompetent hack that is ruining the party, the country, the economy, the education system, and pretty well the world and don’t know how to say it without insulting The Father.

  • Although on the surface it looks like all these defections out of the Bush/Cheney camp are rats leaving a sinking ship, another way of looking at it could be an attempt to rehab the RNC. If it looks like the middle level functionaries are denouncing the current regime as if to say, “Y’see… These guys aren’t REAL Republicans. They aren’t or weren’t _______- enough”, as a way of deflecting the blame of today’s failures onto the Bushies and away from the RNC proper. So when the election season is in full swing, they can run a candidate that is billed as the antithesis of Bush yet not a Democrat. Then still claim to support the wingnuts and christopaths in whatever lunacy will get them to vote for the ‘pubs.

    Talk about being between the Devil and the deep blue sea. The two things that would actually hurt the Democratic party’s chances in 2008 are the two things that would help America in the short-term, those being: Impeaching Bush and Cheney and pulling all of our troops out of Iraq, ASAP. Doing those two things would give the R’s breathing room to recoup, rearm and devise a new strategy of making Bush the bad guy and rolling out a new, untainted by the double whammy of ‘everything-gate’, starring Karl Rove and the war, giving them a year or so to actually show how unlike Bush they are and not have to defend any of the Bush admin’s plethora of inadequacies nor blunders.

    I know.. It sucks either way.

  • Comments are closed.