How the White House defines ‘outreach’ to ‘all different types of groups’

With the nomination of retired federal judge Michael Mukasey as Attorney General, the White House seems to realize that its biggest hurdle may be on the right, not the left. The NYT reported today that Bush aides have made “a furious attempt” to “sell the nomination to conservatives. As part of the effort, six “leading conservative thinkers” — it’s unclear who — were invited to the White House for exclusive meetings with Mukasey. He was apparently quizzed on everything from his views on national security matters to his “Republican pedigree.”

The subject came up at yesterday’s press briefing with Press Secretary Dana Perino, who emphasized that the White House has done “lots of outreach.”

Q Were you surprised that it was conservatives who raised the most questions about him?

MS. PERINO: Look, I think that there are people on both sides of the aisle — I heard this morning that there were some left-wing groups are saying that they would oppose him without getting to know him first. Sometimes people just have an initial reaction without getting to know somebody first. So, no, I don’t think I was surprised, but we are continuing to reach out to members of all different types of groups that we usually reach out to, through the Office of Public Liaison.

Q Do you make him available to left-wing groups, as you did to conservatives?

MS. PERINO: That hasn’t happened yet and I wouldn’t anticipate it.

No, I wouldn’t either.

As for Dems, Pat Leahy & Co. aren’t planning to hold Mukasey hostage in order to get sought after documents from the Justice Department, but they also aren’t going to make it too easy.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) said his panel would consider Mukasey “in a serious and deliberate fashion.” But he made it clear that Democrats considered access to at least some of the long-sought administration documents as essential to their evaluation of Mukasey’s fitness to lead the Justice Department.

“Our focus now will be on securing the relevant information we need so we can proceed to schedule fair and thorough hearings,” Leahy said. “Cooperation from the White House will be essential in determining that schedule.”

For months, the Bush administration and Democrats have been deadlocked over documents that could shed light on the role the White House played last year in the firing of nine U.S. attorneys. Democrats view the purge as politically motivated. They also are demanding access to internal Justice Department memos that might provide information on a dispute over whether a pivotal post-Sept. 11 anti-terrorism program was legal.

No one is suggesting that Democrats will hold Mukasey’s nomination hostage until the White House capitulates entirely. And many Democrats welcomed the news that Bush — in what they viewed as a conciliatory move — had chosen the retired judge, who is known for his independence and relative bipartisanship. Mukasey is neither a Bush crony nor an administration insider, as Gonzales was.

Still, Democrats said Monday that they expected Bush to scale back his broad assertions of executive privilege at least somewhat.

“I hope that this nomination is a sign that the White House will quickly reach agreement on providing documents and witnesses in connection with our investigation,” said Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.). “That is what would be best for the investigation, and it would assure a much less bumpy confirmation process.”

Stay tuned.

“No one is suggesting that Democrats will hold Mukasey’s nomination hostage until the White House capitulates entirely.”

…Just mostly.

“Our focus now will be on securing the relevant information we need so we can proceed to schedule fair and thorough hearings,” Leahy said. “Cooperation from the White House will be essential in determining that schedule.” Leahy said.

  • ‘outreach’ to ‘all different types of groups’

    Political groups? Oh, we got both kinds: conservatives and neoconservatives.

  • “I hope that this nomination is a sign that President Lucy will quickly reach agreement on holding the football steady for my kick,” said Sen. Charles Brown (D).

  • “Our focus now will be on securing the relevant information we need so we can proceed to schedule fair and thorough hearings,” Leahy said. “Cooperation from the White House will be essential in determining that schedule.”

    don’t be in too much of a hurry. although mukasey would probably be a better pick than the interim ag, try to get as much leverage as possible out of this, ok?

  • I think there needs to be an awareness of who is acting as Attorney General while Mukasey is waiting to be confirmed, and what the implications are of that as well as the implication should Mukasey not be confirmed.

    In a light-bulb moment, the WH realized that the Supreme Court begins its term in 2 weeks, which means that Solicitor General Paul Clement needs to be focusing on that and not on being acting AG. So…the WH instead named Peter Keisler to be acting AG, so that Clement could remain Solicitor General.

    Who is Peter Keisler? Keisler is a former assistant attorney general, who is a co-founder of the Federalist Society, he was out in front arguing in favor of stripping habeas rights, was allegedly involved in pressuring the prosecutor to go easy on the tobacco companies in that major case, and he believes strongly that whistle blowers represent a danger to national security and should not be afforded statutory protections. Bush has nominated him to the federal bench three times – the first two times his nomination was rejected; his current nomination has not been acted on. He recently resigned to spend more time with his family, but has been coaxed back to take on the acting AG position.

    Now, I have a couple of questions…assuming Mukasey would be confirmed, is the plan to have Keisler fade back into retirement, or would he be asked to stay on, and in what position – there are a lot of open slots, as we know. Is the point of getting Keisler in as acting AG so that the acceptable-to-Democrats Mukasey can serve as a figurehead AG? Are we being appeased with one hand and punk’d with the other?

    What happens if the Mukasey confirmation drags on – what will Keisler be up to while everyone is looking at Mukasey?

    What happens if Mukasey is not confirmed? Does Keisler get a recess appointment to be the AG, in which case, the WH will have replaced Gonzales with someone who will be well-placed to continue the policies of his predecessor?

    I think these are important questions, and so far, I am not seeing any answers.

  • When I combine this fact:

    ***Press Secretary Dana Perino…emphasized that the White House has done “lots of outreach.”***

    With this fact:

    ***…six “leading conservative thinkers” — it’s unclear who — were invited to the White House for exclusive meetings with Mukasey. He was apparently quizzed on everything from his views on national security matters to his “Republican pedigree.”***

    I keep coming up with some really bizarre, Psycho-Franken-Phant image.

    And this WH is supposed to be so-ooo against nominee litmus tests, and so-ooo for unimpeded up-or-down votes….

  • It is next to impossible to believe that this regime has any interest in a moderate, competent, experienced, non-partisan AG. That would be called governing, not ruling. And they want to rule.

    So Mukasey is a gloss in the post-Rove era, thought up by Bolton, to defang the Dim-Dems. He is supposed to be just a place-holding figurehead for the next 16-months. He won’t exercise any real power unless he’s willing to play politics like he has never before, and what would that get him? This guy Keisler, a genuine fire-breathing dragon of the right-wing Federalist Society, will make sure business as usual -obfuscation, obstruction, and mendacity, continues at DOJ. The secrets must be kept, and the evidence destroyed. A real AG worthy of the name? Not from the Bush WH.

    Why are we constantly buying the con from this bunch of thugs?

  • After years of this nonsense, the childish demonizing of the left just gets very old. Avoiding reality (again) Perino’s “I heard this morning that there were some left-wing groups are saying that they would oppose him” deserved a follow-up question, “Which left-wing groups?”

    The endless repetition of the “evil liberal” mantra at every opportunity by another right-wing hack like Perino now doesn’t work too well. It’s like an obnoxious commercial that you automatically ignore.

  • The point which seemed to resonate with the American people about AG AG was that he was the President’s lawyer instead of the Peoples’ lawyer. The Dems can twist this nomination to bludgeon the President with that similar type of simple binary in which the Dems have generally done poorly. My father and I talk about how the GOP message is boiled down to the simplest choices possible whereas the Dems complicate matters and confuse the simple minded individuals. Perhaps they are learning?

  • Comments are closed.