Huckabee blames Clinton, spins himself in circles

The Wayne Dumond controversy has clearly thrown Mike Huckabee’s presidential campaign for a loop — given the seriousness of Huckabee’s role in Dumond’s release, the story has the potential to permanently undermine his campaign.

In response, the former Arkansas governor has come up with a two-prong defense: 1) Huckabee claims not to have been involved; and 2) this is Bill Clinton’s fault anyway.

On the latter point, Huckabee was emphasizing this nonsense on national television this morning.

In an appearance on CBS this morning, Huckabee noted that the parole board members were “appointed by Bill Clinton, by Jim Guy Tucker,” that “Jim Guy Tucker, in concert with Bill Clinton … reduced [DuMond’s] sentence,” and that “it was Bill Clinton and Jim Guy Tucker who actually commuted Mr. DuMond’s sentence, making him parole-eligible.”

Huckabee made sure to mention Wednesday that Tucker was “convicted of Whitewater-related felonies.” And just in case that wasn’t enough, he noted in an interview on MSNBC this morning that some of the new attention to the DuMond case is being driven by Waas’ reporting in the Huffington Post, “one of the most left-wing blogs in the blogosphere.”

First, Clinton didn’t reduce the sentence, Tucker commuted Dumond’s life sentence to 39 years. That made him parole-eligible, but it was Huckabee who actively sought Dumond’s release, in large part because this convicted rapist had become a right-wing cause celebre.

Second, for Huckabee to argue that he wasn’t involved in the parole process is flatly contradicted by a lot of evidence.

Controversies like these come up from time to time. Governors commute sentences or grant parole for a convict, the convict then commits a heinous act, and the governor gets the blame. The tragedies are hard to spin, but governors are usually wise to accept responsibility and promise to do better in the future.

But lying about it only makes matters worse. Regrettably, that’s the path Huckabee has chosen.

Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee made a rare personal appeal to release a convicted rapist from prison, a former top aide to the GOP presidential hopeful confirmed to ABC News.

Butch Reeves, formerly the criminal justice counsel to the Arkansas governor’s office, handled all requests for clemencies and communications with prisoners.

His account of a key 1996 meeting between then-Gov. Huckabee and the state parole board largely supports an earlier version of the meeting by former board member Charles Chastain. It contrasts with Huckabee’s position that he did not pressure the board.

“At their invitation, I went to their meeting. Someone brought up his case,” Huckabee said Tuesday, describing his meeting with the board. “Frankly it was simply part of a broader discussion. I did not ask them to do anything.”

In a phone interview, Reeves said Huckabee told the board members he thought there was “something nefarious” about the criminal justice system in Dumond’s case, and that the rapist got a “raw deal.” Huckabee said he believed Dumond’s sentence, originally a life sentence plus 20 years, was “way out of bounds” for his crime, raping a 17-year-old high school student.

Reeves said he could recall only a few such appeals being made by a governor.

And it’s not just Reeves who’s coming forward to contradict Huckabee’s version of events.

The [parole] board’s decision came after a closed-door, off-the-record meeting with Huckabee and one of his aides in October 1996. During that meeting, former board member Charles Chastain said in 2001, Huckabee “made it obvious that he thought DuMond had gotten a raw deal and wanted us to take another look at it. Another former board member, Deborah Springer Suttlar, told journalist Murray Waas in 2002: “For Gov. Huckabee to say that he had no influence with the board is something that he knows to be untrue. He came before the board and made his views known that [DuMond] should have been paroled . . . .” A third board member, Ermer Pondexter, told Waas in 2002 that she voted for DuMond’s parole because the chairman of the parole board asked her to do so — and that she believed he was “acting on behalf of the governor.”

The smart way out of this was to acknowledge the truth, express regret, and promise voters to learn from the mistake. Instead, Huckabee not only pushed to let a violent criminal out of jail for political reasons, he’s lying about it now.

There are some controversies that are almost impossible to recover from. This is just such a controversy.

“The [parole] board’s decision came after a closed-door, off-the-record meeting with Huckabee…”

All of these meetings/hearings are taped. Failure to do so is likely a violation of state law. But for some reason, for this one meeting/hearing, the person responsible for the transcript and taping was forced to leave the meeting/hearing. Seems fair to assume, then, that Huckabee knew, even then, that what he was doing might come back to bite him in the arse politically and he did all he could do to limit any evidence of his actions. These specific facts, together with his denials today, speak volumes as to Huckabee’s character and hypocrisy (on many levels).

  • I think there is a perfectly good explanation that Huckabee hasn’t offered yet… Maybe Satan impersonated Huckabee at the parole board meeting. He does stuff like that you know.

    Buh bye, Huckabee. Don’t forget your door prize, and take Chuck Norris with you.

  • “There are some controversies that are almost impossible to recover from [if you are a Democrat]. This is just such a controversy.”

    There, fixed it for you. Have you learned nothing from your recent schooling by Bob Somerby? IOIYAR.

  • I read Huckabee’s version of events yesterday where he claimed that quote “nobody, not me, not Jim Guy Tucker, not Bill Clinton, not that parole board, could ever imagine what might have transpired.” Unquote.

    No one could have envisioned that a convicted rapist who had been subsequently mutilated could do it again? Is he kidding us? He might have said that they thought the chances that he would do it again were so low that they decided to relase him, but to imagine it wouldn’t happen again displays a sense of judgement that the current administration would be proud of, the planes into building defense!
    And this man wants to persuade Americans he is fit to be President?

    Of course, perhaps GOD told him to do it, then it’s OK right?

  • I am in awe at what an extreme pack of lying, worthless low-life candidates the Republicans are pushing to run for this countries highest office. I did not think it possible to find this many candidates who could continue to lead this country into the dumper as well as Mr. Bush.

  • I am in awe at what an extreme pack of lying, worthless low-life candidates the Republicans are pushing to run for this countries highest office

    Worse, tiredofgreed, they haven’t even scraped the bottom of the barrel yet, frightening tho that might be

  • “…they haven’t even scraped the bottom of the barrel yet…”

    Considering that their bullpen is the young college republicans, these guys now are sort of the cream of the crop, with plenty more like them in the pipeline. They are no where near the bottom of the barrel.

  • It’s almost laughable that the GOP has a presidential candidate who’s guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors worthy of impeachment—and they haven’t even gotten to the primaries yet!

    Oh, well—so much for “the Huck and Chuck Comedy Hour….”

  • This is like watching one of those 20-car NASCAR pile-ups. Is there a Republican candidate out there who isn’t fatally flawed? Mike Gravel looks statesmanlike compared to these guys. It’ll be a sad day when one of these guys garners more than 45 percent of the American electorate. Can’t the GOP just take a pass in 2008? We’ll get you next time, guys.

  • Re: JZ @ #11
    Is there a Republican candidate out there who isn’t fatally flawed?

    I feel the same way about the Democratic candidates. Except for Kucinich and Gravel, the “top-tier” candidates continue to stand idly by whilst fascism is enthroned in America and our open, democratic society is closed.

    Or I am mistaken? Can anyone cite an instance where one of the Democratic Candidates, aside from Kucinich or Gravel, took a clear stand on reaffirming the integrity of our Constitutional Republic if elected to office? Where is the conviction of the Democratic candidates that government of the people, by the people and for the people must never perish from the Earth?

    Please explain to me which issue is more important than the integrity of our Constitutional Republic, which is meant to serve and protect the interests of our Liberty and Freedom above all other interests and the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

    But a majority of the Democratic and Republican Candidates favor or in fact voted for the unconstitutional “Patriot” Act, the Orwellian undermining of the Bill of Rights reminiscent of the Enabling Act of Nazi Germany.

    My Patriot Act is the Bill of Rights.

    I shall not exercise my most revered Constitutional right to cast my ballot in favor of a candidate who believes, as Carpetbagger regular Swan indicated recently, “is a good thing.”

  • Correction: I shall not exercise my most revered Constitutional right to cast my ballot in favor of a candidate who believes that, as Carpetbagger regular Swan indicated recently, “Patriot Act is a good thing.”

  • Men who rape think they are powerful for the stain they put on a woman’s life, even if they are thrown in prison and have their ambitions ruined. They feel powerful for that one perverted act, and Mike Huckabee is no different. He feels powerful because of the rape the man he let free subsequently committed.

    Mike Huckabee’s presidential campaign will not be successful. He thinks he can gain by not acknowledging his own actions and their results and by trying to pin them on someone else who had nothing to do with them. By trying to skate and not claim responsibility for this man’s actions, he is trying to own what this man did and profit from it.

    Mike Huckabee’s delusions will not work out for him any more than any rapist in prison has had it work out for him. Huckabee wants to be remembered as a president or as a presidential candidate, but he will be remembered as a fraud whose petty, sick dreams of letting women be hurt diverted his other goals. You are sick, Mike Huckabee, and you should discourage rape instead of setting examples for people to lie to cover up how they helped it happen.

  • The Huckster is lucky I am not in charge of advertising for the other side.
    I’d SwiftBoat him to hell and back on this…
    When my ads got done with him…
    He’d be so bruised and bashed…
    He’d be putting sentences together like Bush.

  • The only question about Huck/Dum that needs to be asked is, “who was governor when the guy was set free”?
    The problem is that I haven’t heard that question asked on air or to his face. Gutless.

  • Well, I think the real question is just what the hell Huck was thinking when he got involved with a rapist’s case. Since when does a governor concern himself with such a creep, unless he [Huck] had ulterior motive. I mean, we are not talking about a Nelson Mandella type here.

    Clearly, Huckabee was more concerned about furthering his political agenda and he let his personal hatred of Clinton cloud good judgement.

    And sorry Huck, splitting hairs on legal distinctions [governors cannot parole] won’t work. A sitting governor visiting the Parole Board was not an attempt to influence their decisions. And answer this: just what was your purpose in visiting the Parole Board that was in session, and asking about the Willie Horton [excuse me, Dumond] case?

    Lastly, on an evidentiary point, you don’t get to tell the person who records the sessions to leave the room and then later contradict what was said because there was no record of the conversations. In other words, you can’t “destroy the tapes” then later on say “Well here is what the tapes said, tapes I destroyed.” One cannot attempt to benefit from illegal acts [telling the recorder person to leave the room is “destruction of evidence,” of sorts.]

    I think it’s amusing [and pathetic] that Huckabee is now desperately trying to contradict the accountings of events by people who were at the session. In a sense those people are the recordings Huckabee tried to exclude that day.

    So now what does he do… attack the parole board [e.g., “those people were not reappointed, so they are bitter.”] And by not admitting fault and accepting responsibility [expressing sympathy for the victims is not accepting responsibility] is akin to blaming the victims of Dumond’s crimes for this entire mess [which he did back then because I don’t think Huckabee believed the women had been raped.]

  • Correction, meant to say:

    “A sitting governor visiting the Parole Board was an attempt to influence their decisions”

  • JKap, I think it would be fair to put Dodd on the “defending the Constitution” side of the ledger. He may not have gotten their as early as one would like, but he has been out front on the issue the past six month, certainly moreso than any other Dem candidate.

  • For those of you who have ever known the truth and when confronting your child about some situation watch them either hem-haw around before finally admitting to what you already know compared to a child who immediately starts lying and rationalizing not knowing that you already know the truth and you are just amazed at the lengths they go to rather than just admit the truth. The more they lie the more the forgiveness and understanding factor goes out the window.
    Hukabee’s character and integrity just went out the window. His adviser should be fired for not insisting the truth was more important here than losing his integrity by trying to spin out of the controversy.

    btw…”the Huck and Chuck comedy hour”? lol…funny

    ***Jkap*** I understand your conviction but keep in mind we are not electing Kings and Queens or dictators. They are elected to carry out the dictates of the party. No matter what they day the repubs have backed Bush on everything he’s done. The democratic party has many traitors to the dictates of the people’s party but it is the representatives of the party that we need to get elected in congress to pressure who ever we elect as president to follow our democratic platform. But for the democratic party to follow their own platform we need to have a democrat as president plus a democratic congress to get the issues WE want addressed put into action. We need your vote to get a dem elected president and we need your voice to pressure the party to get our issues addressed. Yes these candidates are as you say but WE must create the parade they will lead for they are just representatives of our party’s platform…not rulers.

  • On December 6th, 2007 at 1:13 pm, ROTFLMLAO said:
    The Huckster is lucky I am not in charge of advertising for the other side.
    I’d SwiftBoat him to hell and back on this…
    When my ads got done with him…
    He’d be so bruised and bashed…
    He’d be putting sentences together like Bush.

    In which case I wish you were in charge of advertising.

    I would like to give all of the Democratic candidates a simple nomination litmus test, preferably hooked to a polygraph machine.

    “Would you have the slightest hesitation, lose a minute of sleep, suffer any heartburn, or even a teensy bit of cognitive dissonance in greenlighting a devestating and blunt campaign ad about Huckabee’s intervention to release a rapist who later committed murder, an ad that would make the Willie Horton ad look like one of Reagan’s ‘Morning in America’ series? How about an ad showing Giuliani’s parade press coverage where his wife first learned of his mistress or an ad about his taxpayer-financed trysts in the Hamptons? An ad showing all of McCain’s flip-flops without mercy? A video re-enactment of the stepfordization process where Romney was replaced with an android?”

    Any candidate who would flinch, even so slightly, is rejected from eligibility.

  • The smart way out of this was to acknowledge the truth, express regret, and promise voters to learn from the mistake. Instead, Huckabee not only pushed to let a violent criminal out of jail for political reasons, he’s lying about it now.

    The Truth is that Huckabee approved of the rape of a Clinton relative. You know, just like Bosnians/Croats approved of the rape of Muslim women and boys. Wrong religion, wrong relatives, wrong politics; baby, you know that you had it coming to you.

  • tiredofgreed said:
    I am in awe at what an extreme pack of lying, worthless low-life candidates the Republicans are pushing to run for this countries highest office. I did not think it possible to find this many candidates who could continue to lead this country into the dumper as well as Mr. Bush.

    If you look at the quality of candidates that the Republicans have put up since and including Nixon, they have gotten dummer and meaner every election – local as well as national. This bunch just continues an accelerating suicide dumpster dive.

    Not that the Dems have put up anybody much worth while. But at least Jimmy is intelligent and moral and got the Camp David Accords, and Bill got the economy going again and balanced the budget and then some. Dole won a Nobel prize, And Kerry looks better in hind site every day.
    At least the Dems are not destroyers, and the Republicans have been, now, for over a quarter of a century.

  • “U.S. Christians are not reconciled to McCain’s candidacy but instead regard the prospective presidency of Barack Obama in the nature of a biblical plague visited upon a sinful people. These militants look at former Baptist preacher Huckabee as ‘God’s candidate’ for president in 2012. Whether they can be written off as merely a troublesome fringe group depends on Huckabee’s course…
    ————————–
    johnsmith

    Wide Circles

  • Comments are closed.