Huckabee flubs the latest in a series of policy tests

Mike Huckabee appearance on the “Tonight Show” last night seems like inconsequential trivia. It’s an entertainment show; Huckabee is trying to score some 11th-hour likability points; and it’s probably a sign that the former governor’s campaign is trying to expand his base beyond religious right activists in Iowa.

But the problem with the appearance is more nuanced than that. Huckabee, who is still trying to maintain the fiction that he’s a “populist,” expressed strong support for the Writers’ Guild strike, and then crossed the WGA picket line.

Earlier Wednesday, Huckabee said he supports the writers and did not think he would be crossing a picket line, because he believed the writers had made an agreement to allow late night shows back on the air.

“My understanding is that there was a special arrangement made for the late-night shows, and the writers have made this agreement to let the late night shows to come back on, so I don’t anticipate that it’s crossing a picket line,” Huckabee told reporters traveling with him Wednesday from Fort Dodge to Mason City.

In fact, that is true only of David Letterman, who has a separate agreement with writers for his “Late Show.”

Told he was mistaken and that writers had cleared only Letterman’s show, Huckabee protested:

“But my understanding is there’s a sort of dispensation given to the late-night shows, is that right?”

Told again that he was wrong, Huckabee murmured, “Hmmm,” and, “Oh,” before answering another question.

Look, this need not be complicated. If Huckabee wants to cross a picket line, that’s his choice, and he can accept the consequences of thumbing his nose at unions. But this is actually much worse — Huckabee crossed a picket line of workers he claims to support enthusiastically.

Huckabee said he stood with the writers.

“I support the writers, by the way. Unequivocally, absolutely,” he said. “They’re dead right on this one. And they ought to get royalties off the residuals and the long-term contracts.”

“I don’t think anybody supports the producers on this one,” he added. “Maybe the producers support the producers, but I think everybody in the business and even the general public supports the writers.”

What? If someone “unequivocally” supports the striking union members, he wouldn’t cross their picket line and undermine their strike. What’s more, he’d know the basics about the major labor dispute before talking to reporters about it — and getting the facts wrong.

What’s more, the last thing Huckabee needed right now is yet another example of talking about something he doesn’t understand, and then flubbing all the pertinent details. As ABC News’ Jake Tapper noted, this is “the latest example of Huckabee being uninformed about a major event.”

As for the union, the writers are not impressed by Huckabee’s absurd I-support-the-strike-but-not-really argument.

Huckabee said he supports the writers and did not think he would be crossing a picket line, because he believed the writers had made an agreement to allow late-night shows on the air. But that’s not the case with Leno; “Huckabee is a scab,” read one picket sign outside Leno’s Burbank, Calif., studio.

The writers guild urged Huckabee not to cross their picket line after he flew out to California. But Huckabee appeared on Leno, even showing off his electric [bass] guitar playing with the band.

John Bowman, the WGA’s chief union negotiator, said, “Huckabee claims he didn’t know. I don’t know what that means in terms of trusting him as a future president.”

No wonder TV is so good in America: we’ve got unions.

Now if only someone could explain why network TV is starting to stink so much over the past few years, then I’d be even less uninformed.

  • Huck’s position on the strike reminds me of certain people (no need to name names) who strongly support the war in Iraq, but think it’s too expensive or too much trouble to give veterans the care and support that they need once they get home. They propagandize by by the mantra “support the troops,” but they don’t live it.

    It’s real simple, Huck. If you support the strike, you need to support the strikers.

  • I would’ve gone on the Tonight Show for the same reason. Like Huckabee, I would’ve assumed that Jay Leno had gotten the OK from his writers to put the rest of the crew back to work. Shouldn’t Leno be the one to know? He’ll have to work with the writing staff when the strike is over.

    Is Leno being blasted as a strike-breaker, too?

  • letterman owns his show (worldwide pants); nbc owns the tonight show (and hence they own leno). unless someone is suggesting huckabee has better writers than the Tonight Show’s, i’d suggest this is a tempest in a teapot.

    did huckabee voice support for the strike during his appearance?

  • Look, I know people are happy that the late night shows are coming back on, but Grumpy, the networks are forcing the hosts to go back on w/o the writers, hoping to break the strike. I personally find this so distasteful that I would like to carry out a few brutal acts of violence on these network heads (and AMPTP people). Basically, Leno has a contract(so does Stewart and Colbert and others) and he could conceivably lose his job/show if he doesn’t follow suit. They’re in a bad spot cause they want to support the writers, but they also want to make sure there is a show for the writers to come back to when the strike is over. The exception is Letterman because he owns his own production company and has already settled with his writers.

  • Homer Hewitt said: “I can’t see why Huckabee is often tagged as a populist candidate.”

    It’s because the likes of the Prince of Darkness thinks it’s wrong for a state like Arkansas to have its revenues increase from $6 Bil to $16 Bil over the ten years he was Governor.

    Of course, it be nice to compare the economic growth during that same period before we blast him. And compare state spending as a precentage of GDP to that of other states.

    I mean, it’s Arkansas already. There’s room for growth there.

  • Is crossing a picket line going to cost anyone very many votes in a Republican caucus? Regardless of whether you disapprove of his actions, I think it could only help Huckabee in terms of the Republican race.

  • I have only a slight problem with that Huckabee didn’t know initially that he would be crossing the picket lines to go on the “Tonight Show”. However, after being told twice that he would be crossing a picket line to go on the show, he went on it anyways. So he supports the strike “unequivocally, absolutely” as long as not inconvenient to do so.

  • Ah, a contract. Thanks, DB.

    Even if Huckabee didn’t voice support for writers during the show, he has said so afterward. That still gets the message out. What did NBC get in return? More ad bucks for bringing the eyeballs of Huckabee fans to TV screens.

    I wonder if Stewart, Colbert, and the rest are going to use their platforms to carry the WGA message. Would The Daily Show be able to adapt the skit that its writers concocted early in the strike? That video was killer.

  • Okie wrote:

    It’s real simple, Huck. If you support the strike, you need to support the strikers.

    To make it even more explicit than that, the point of a strike- where the pressure comes from- is that the TV is not going to be as good without the writers. So if Huckabee’s appearance is a valuable commodity for the TV shows, he’s going out of his way to appear on the show and make it better when the strikers he’s claiming to support want the shows to feel pressure and feel like people aren’t going to watch without their writing. He’s at odds with the strikers merely by appearing on the show; he’s saying to them that he cares about himself, not about the strikers.

    And the surprises keep on coming. My guess: it will be announced that Huckabee is gay, and that he’s stalking some pious 16 year old boy from Iowa who works for his campaign, in 5, 4, 3, 2 . . .

  • Dear me, how can cHuckabee support the sinners and perverts that bring us all the unholy smut we see on our TeeVees? Maybe crossing the picket line was a big ol’ wink to the TalEvan.

  • Huck is trying is trying to be a populist, but he is, after all, a Republican. You can inject populism into a Republican, but you can’t take the Republican elitism out of a Republican. For a great tak on the Huckster, check out this great post by Tim Egan – http://egan.blogs.nytimes.com/?hp .

  • Hucklebuck merely demonstrates why people with brains have been laughing at people like him for as long as we have. He’s the kind of “southerner” I’m talking about when I use the term negatively. He reminds me of the southerners I knew in boot camp who couldn’t even score half the average of 41 on the aptitude test (100 possible). No wonder he comes across as stupid – he IS!!!

    As far as him crossing my union’s picket line is concerned, he’s a Republican – it’s like being surprised when a shark tries to eat you.

    His line on the show, that “people are looking for a guy who looks like the guy they work with, not the guy who laid them off” was pathetic – but then I know all kinds of unionized morons who would make a choice on that basis, rather than on where the candidate actually stands on issues of direct importance to their interests (can you say “Reagan Democrats”?).

    What really pisses me off is Jay Leno – fellow union member – caving in to the pimps as he did. He used to at least seem like a man of principle when I met him face to face.

  • And now it comes out that that Man of Principle, Jay Leno, violated the “agreement” he did have with the Guild: that he wouldn’t write his jokes. It’s now out that his monologue was on the teleprompters – which means it was written.

    Bu-bye, Jay. You schmuck.

  • Tom – I’m surprised that it took this long for you to see Leno in his true form.
    Jon Swift has had him lumped with Limbaugh & Fox “News” for as long as he has blogged, and for good reason.

  • I’m curious where (if?) Huckabee gets his news. He seems remarkably uninformed about things that have been widely covered. I mean, even if he read the front page of the complimentary USA Today in his hotel room while using the toilet in the morning he’s have to know more. Doesn’t he even have the TV on in his room while he’s getting dressed? He seems to have no desire to stay in touch with current events, and no established habits for following the news. It’s just plain weird for a candidate.

    It scares me to think he’s this disconnected from the news when he’s not even in the White House bubble. Imagine how bad his information would be there.

  • Huckabee is full of it. I don’t buy it for a minute, and the WGA statement seems to confirm the deception. The GOP is traditionally fiercely anti-union, and Huckabee would trample over any union members, little old ladies and children to get on Leno and pull his schtick. As legitmately ignorant as Huckabee is on many foreign policy matters, much of his patter is very calculated to the GOP base. He just played dumb to get his air time without trying to offend anyone. Ironically, though, he sure didn’t pick up any union votes with this, and he might have irked some of the GOP base. That’s the sort of sharp campaigning I love to see from Republicans!

    (Of course, he is getting play from the guitar footage, since our MSM luvs that stuff, and I’m sure he figured that would help him more than his lie would cost him.)

  • Shouldn’t Huckabee’s staff at least have been informed enough to keep their boss from making yet another horrific blunder? Or are they all graduates of Liberty University and therefore as clueless as he is?

    /snark

  • Leno’s a whore doing what he’s paid to do with enthusiasm. He really stands for nothing serious. Why bother to ask yourself if Hukabee could be that ignorant and uninformed…How many more chances does he get to prove it?

  • His line on the show, that “people are looking for a guy who looks like the guy they work with, not the guy who laid them off”

    O gods not that “I’d like to have a beer with him,” stupid arse bullshit again. The only reason I hope cHuckabee gets the GOP nod is because it will make all the neo/bus/def-cons drop dead of apoplexy. When the Dem candidate crushes his arse the theo/so-cons would look like the loud but irrelevant pack of morons that they are.

  • Why did he even want to go on Leno’s show anyway? He could just as easily had stayed away, or tried to get booked on Letterman instead.

  • Comments are closed.