Huckabee’s Wayne Dumond problem

Way back in January, Mike Huckabee appeared on Meet the Press and was asked about Wayne Dumond. In 1996, Dumond, a convicted rapist who attacked a 17-year-old girl, was up for parole, but the Arkansas parole board was poised to deny his request. Huckabee intervened and announced he would commute Dumond’s sentence, causing the parole board to reverse course and grant him parole, a decision Huckabee endorsed.

Within a year of being freed, Dumond traveled to Missouri, where he raped and killed another young woman, and was the lead suspect in another rape and murder case. Tim Russert asked the former governor if he regretted supporting Dumond’s parole. Huckabee was evasive, saying only that he “wish[ed] that I had known more than I knew.” Huckabee went on to insist that he did not intervene in Dumond’s case with the parole board, and neither he nor his staff tried to convince the board to grant Dumond parole.

Some political observers are calling the case Huckabee’s “Willie Horton” problem, in reference to the felon who committed armed robbery and rape under a weekend furlough program adopted by Michael Dukakis. But it’s actually worse — Dukakis didn’t lie about Willie Horton, and Huckabee is lying about Wayne Dumond.

As governor of Arkansas, Mike Huckabee aggressively pushed for the early release of a convicted rapist despite being warned by numerous women that the convict had sexually assaulted them or their family members, and would likely strike again. The convict went on to rape and murder at least one other woman.

Confidential Arkansas state government records, including letters from these women, obtained by the Huffington Post and revealed publicly for the first time, directly contradict the version of events now being put forward by Huckabee.

While on the campaign trail, Huckabee has claimed that he supported the 1999 release of Wayne Dumond because, at the time, he had no good reason to believe that the man represented a further threat to the public. Thanks to Huckabee’s intervention, conducted in concert with a right-wing tabloid campaign on Dumond’s behalf, Dumond was let out of prison 25 years before his sentence would have ended.

And why on earth would Huckabee have supported the release of a man convicted of raping a teenaged girl in the first place? Because of a right-wing political campaign on Dumond’s behalf.

CBS News explained yesterday that Dumond’s original victim was a distant cousin of then-Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton and the daughter of a major Democratic campaign contributor.

As Clinton rose to national prominence, the case came to the attention of his critics. Journalists and talk show hosts questioned the victim’s story and suggested that DuMond had been railroaded by the former governor. Steve Dunleavy, a New York Post columnist, took up the case as a cause, calling DuMond’s conviction “a travesty of justice.” […]

When Huckabee became governor in 1996, he expressed doubts about DuMond’s guilt and said he was considering commuting his sentence to time served. After the victim and her supporters protested, Huckabee decided against commutation. But in 1997, according to the Kansas City Star, Huckabee wrote a letter to DuMond saying “my desire is that you be released from prison.” Less than a year later, DuMond was granted parole.

Huckabee’s office denied that the governor played a role in the parole board’s decision, but there was evidence (exhaustively detailed here) to contradict that claim.

Charles Chastain, a Professor of Criminal Justice at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, who was on the parole board at the time, told CBSNews.com the governor met with the board to argue on DuMond’s behalf.

“He thought DuMond had gotten a raw deal,” said Chastain, who calls himself neutral towards Huckabee. “He said he’d been born on the wrong side of the tracks and hadn’t been treated all that fairly.”

For some conservatives, Clinton Derangement Syndrome was so intense, they defended a man convicted of raping a 17-year-old girl — and then Huckabee bought into it, ultimately supporting the rapist’s release.

That’s where Murray Waas’ revelations come into play. The governor received chilling testimonies from other victims and their relatives that Dumond was a dangerous criminal who would strike again, but he dismissed their concerns, in part because this rapist had become a cause celebre in right-wing circles.

To be sure, this painful, tragic story isn’t exactly new; Huckabee watchers have been talking about it for years. Even this year, his critics couldn’t imagine why this scandal hadn’t knocked Huckabee out of contention for the Republican nomination.

But he wasn’t a credible candidate, and the political world didn’t take the story seriously. Now that there’s evidence, not only of Huckabee’s awful judgment, but also of his blatant dishonesty, expect to hear the name Wayne Dumond quite a bit more. It should, if there’s any justice at all, ruin Huckabee’s chances.

Well, and then there’s that refusal to allow a young woman raped and impregnated by a family member – stepfather? – to obtain an abortion, in direct conflict with federal law, so some might argue that Huckabee has a soft spot for rapists (or is it a hard spot?)

Either way, the thought that came to mind was, “something tells me that the voters will have a much stronger aversion to a candidate who lobbied to get a serial rapist out of prison than they will to a candidate who played fast and loose with government money to keep his mistress safe and happy.”

It may be a kind of political Tinkers-to-Evers-to – whoops- Chance dropped the ball: Huckabee knos out Romney, the rapist knocks out Huckabee, and Giuliani slides safely into home.

  • Somehow it seems fitting that conservatives would pull together to support a murderer/rapist. What’s WRONG with these people’s sense of right and wrong?

    Huckabee should fold up his tent and go home. This really tarnishes his’s amiable “good-guy” persona.

  • “wish[ed] that I had known more than I knew.”

    Reminds me of another presidential candidate’s poor decision-making skills.

  • at least the rapist wasn’t a terrorist sympathizer. then he would have stayed in jail………

  • A good reason to never let Republicans gain office is their strong track record of doing things that bring harm to Democrats as a matter of sport, but even further harm the nation as a result. The right wing agenda to do anything that screws Democrats harms everyone. It’s a pathologic condition with Republicans.

  • I had not heard of the Clinton-hatred connection to this issue before reading this post. It’s ironic that the old Steve Dunleavy column is reappearing now, hurting Huckabee and possibly helping Hillary.

    The original Dunleavy column is still available all around the internet. Here is a copy at something called “The Official Anti-Clinton Website:”

    http://www.daveschultz.com/clinton/biggestcrime2.html

    The Clinton-haters must be very proud today.

  • I like how Huckabee wished he knew more at the time than he does now, and yet, “I’m sorry” or “That was an awful decision” and phrases of that ilk can’t seem to cross his pursed li’l lips.

    I got a secret for all the big burly manly men running for Prez on the GOP ticket – I know the armchair soldiers and caged-quail hunters that comprise your base think it’s a sign of weakness – nay, femininity – to admit you’re wrong, to say you made a mistake, to ask forgiveness and promise to be better from now on. I’d suggest that’s why so many of these big burly manly men and their ilk hounded Clinton on anything and everything until he had to apologize for SOMETHING, ANYTHING. After all, to apologize proves he’s a big girl, you know, a Democrat, capice?

    But confessing to weaknesses, and more importantly, LEARNING both from them and to overcome them, is what makes bad leaders good, and good leaders great. No President is gonna bat a thousand, it’s inhuman to always be right, and foolish to try. But it’s also foolish to deny your mistakes, minimize them, hjope nobody notices them and then lie about them thinking THAT will make them go away faster.

    Huckabee let a rapist out of jail. he let his political biases sway his judgment and at least one person is dead because of it. I’m certainly not saying the man should be President, and I wouldn’t say he should be President even if this weren’t an issue in his history. But the Bush days are coming to a close – not just talking about his Administration, but the days when cruel was cool. The days when people could be proud about voting for a man who’d go to war for no reason, who’d send mentally retarded criminals to their death. Accountability is the new black (uh-oh, now the GOP will REALLY hate it), and voters are looking for a little more honesty and competency from their candidates. It’d be far far better for Huckabee to say “That will never happen again on my watch” and mean it, than to say “it never happened before on my watch, and if it did, it certainly wasn’t my fault,” and not mean it.

  • DuMond killed again.
    Just for the joy of it…
    Probably more than once.

    But I don’t think he ever raped again.
    Apparently he castrated himself over 20 years ago:
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1055304/posts

    After the hearing, Shields ’ mother said she was not surprised by DuMond’s actions. “We didn’t expect any remorse from him, and we didn’t get any,” Lois Davidson said. “It was all about him. He was arrogant and hateful.”

    DuMond was convicted in the 1984 rape of a Forrest City teen who is a distant cousin of former President Clinton, then Arkansas’ governor. While awaiting trial on that charge, DuMond said two men forced their way into his home and castrated him. Arkansas authorities suspect that DuMond castrated himself.

    In that case, DuMond was sentenced to serve life plus 20 years in state prison.

    In 1992, Arkansas Gov. Jim Guy Tucker commuted DuMond’s sentence to 39 years and six months, making DuMond immediately eligible for parole.
    In 1997, after Gov. Mike Huckabee announced support for paroling DuMond, the state Post Prison Transfer Board granted the rapist parole, providing he relocate out of state.
    Texas and Florida refused to accept him.
    Missouri initially rejected him but accepted him after he married a Missouri woman.
    Shields was murdered within two months after DuMond relocated to Smithville, a town just north of Kansas City.

    DuMond is dead by the way. May he rest without peace.

    And I am also glad to see family members of his Post-Huckabee murders are not happy with the Huckster:

    http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1204huckabee-ON.html

  • Michael Dukakis had no role in the start of the weekend furlough program. That program was enacted under the governorship of Edward King, who defeated Dukakis in 1978, and who Dukakis beat in his 1982 comeback to retake the state house.

  • Wow, what a screwed-up conservative campaign. I think a lot of conservative men think that rape isn’t a real crime, and that rape victims are kind of complaining too much, and that a rapist hasn’t really hurt the rape victim, he’s just been kind of pushy or a bully.

    They would be more likely, I think, to want the social stigma of rape lessened and to believe that if someone raped once, he won’t necessarily rape again. Could be that a lot of middle-class conservative types experience their first sexual experience as a rape or a date-rape type rape, so they have empathy for rapists; perhpas they don’t even consider what they did even kind of wrong at first, and only later learn that a lot of people would consider it rape, so they subsequently decide to start questioning the whole concept of rape, and adopting weird Saudi-type views on sex, rather than acknowledging that they themselves could have done something wrong, which is of course (in their eyes) impossible.

  • I like how Huckabee wished he knew more at the time than he does now, and yet, “I’m sorry” or “That was an awful decision” and phrases of that ilk can’t seem to cross his pursed li’l lips.

    Great point slappymagoo. I’d add that Huckabee is running as the “I’m the Bestest most Christianest Candiate” candidate. Didn’t Jesus say something about how if you’re praying in temple and realize you’ve done wrong to your brother, get off your butt, run to your brother and apologize?

  • With advance apologies if my post offends, but one might be led to suspect that Huckabee’s philosophy is “it’s okay to rape the relative of a Democrat.” Given that, perhaps the candidate should seek to immigrate to a land more in line with his thinking.

    Saudi Arabia comes to mind….

  • Swan @ 11 Said:

    I think a lot of conservative men think that rape isn’t a real crime

    I think a lot of conservative men still view women as property, to do with as they wish; what women want – or don’t want – is irrelevant.

  • How awful.

    I’m just hoping it’s finally enough to axe him from the list of candidates. I can’t believe people have been taking this guy and his retarded name seriously as a candidate.

    My horrendously selfish reasons aside (I’ve never liked Huckabee as a candidate), may God bless the families affected by this horrible, horrible crime.

  • Can you imagine if Edwards or Obama or Hillary had helped a convicted rapist win parole? Never mind it costing them the presidential nomination. The conservatives would be screaming to throw the candidate in prison. But since it’s a conservative Republican, they simply ignore it. And you can bet that if any Democrat brings it up, they’ll start screaming “No fair, now you’re the ones using Willie Horton tactics!” so fast your head will spin.

  • Conservative men aren’t totally against blaming rape victims.

    That is, as long as they accuse a sitting Democratic President.

  • “But I don’t think he ever raped again.”

    To be blunt, I don’t think one needs a dick to commit rape, or any other of a wide range of sexual crimes.

  • This was a “big deal” on CBS news this morning…BREAKING NEWS as they like to say. I turned to my girlfriend and said the net has been on this since at least the spring!

    Good to know these buffoons are on the job…

  • I agree with #13, but while I think this could be some of the psychological motivation for it, the more immediate motivation was to paint Clinton in a plausible (to the uninformed, undiscerning public) of railroading an innocent man, to sap his (and by extension, Democrats) support from blacks. Get people to hear a few sound bites, and they’ll start believing it.

    People believe that conservatives are responsible for inequitable treatment of blacks because it’s true. What better way to flip this around on Democrats than to make black people think Clinton railroaded a black man. The Republicans perpetrating the smear won’t care that it’s not true.

  • He still had his penis, though I don’t know how functional it was. Only his testicles were removed during the “alleged castration / self-mutilation.”

    But as most people are aware, rape ain’t about the sex.

    Huckabee’s actions are among the most politically craven and disgusting I can think of. And had the worst results too. He deserves to be finished as a candidate, and as a public figure period.

    I blogged on this too, but aside from this piece here and the original at HuffPo, I haven’t seen it pop up anywhere else…

  • If we had a liberal media or it was a democratic candidate you know we would here this question.” Governor Huckabee do you plan to pardon all the rapists or just the ones that raped a Clinton relative.”

  • From a Freeper…they are pushing for a coverup. Lovely:

    Those are fair questions, but they’re difficult to answer. Conceivably, I could explain the situation better by posting embarassing old quotes from numerous prominent FReepers who were demanding DuMond’s release at the time – but I’m NOT going to do that!!!!!

    If this were my forum, I’d be going back and deleting all of those old DuMond threads for the sake of my friends and long-time members who were misinformed on this issue at the time. If Huckabee wins the nomination, the Dems could have a field day with those old comments – to Hillary’s benefit and our regret.

    I realize that the supporters of Huckabee’s opponents are concerned and a little panicky about at his rise in the polls. Their natural instinct is to throw anything and everything they can find at Huckabee, without a though of how it could backfire. But the newcomers don’t realize the role that Free Republic and Steve Dunleavy played in winning Wayne DuMond’s release, so they post this stuff without understanding the consequences. (The same article posted above was also posted yesterday by another recently-joined member – and pulled voluntarily after the history of the situation was explained. It’s interesting how this exact same old article seems to be popping up so frequently now.)

    In my opinion, the best course of action is to keep this stuff off of the forum for now. We don’t need to be posting two-year-old propaganda from Murray Waas and the left-wing Arkansas Times. If Huckabee wins the nomination, a strategy will be available for dealing with the inevitable attacks from Hillary’s camp.

    If Huckabee’s opponents on this forum believe that they absolutely must post this garbage, they could at least see to it that those old threads are deleted first so that they won’t be used against Free Republic in the future.

    I really don’t like talking about damage control on the public forum. It’s like an open line to Hell, and our enemies could easily pick up on it. But at the same time, I don’t know how to explain this stuff to the noobs. They weren’t here when it was going on, so they don’t fully appreciate the situation. I’ve been doing opposition research on the Clintons for 27 years, so I can see the trainwreck we’re heading into if the present course of action continues.

    11 posted on 12/02/2007 2:22:31 AM PST by HAL9000 (Fred Thompson/Mike Huckabee 2008)
    [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

  • Via Andrew Sullivan, Huckabee addresses the Dumond situation. Sullivan finds it candid, even compelling. I don’t. Especially considering the active role he and his staff took trying to suppress the truth by hiding the letters in his archives beyond the reach of FOIA, and because he cannot even express his regret without blaming Bill Clinton:

    “It was a horrible situation, horrible, I feel awful about it in every way. I wish that there was some way I could go back and reverse the clock and put him back in prison. But nobody, not me, not Jim Guy Tucker, not Bill Clinton, not that parole board, could ever imagine what might have transpired.”

    “Nobody could imagine…?” I’m sick to death of that excuse from Republicans, aren’t you? You didn’t have to imagine. It was in writing. On your desk. Sent to you by the parole board. And you chose to ignore it, act on Dumond’s behalf, and push for his release anyway.

  • Even this year, his critics couldn’t imagine why this scandal hadn’t knocked Huckabee out of contention for the Republican nomination.

    Duh? This is the GOP nomination we’re talking about. Most of that party has extreme Clinton Derangement Syndrome. If Huckabee wanted the nomination at the cost of the general election he would play up how he got Dumond out of prison.

  • I guess Huckabee’s integrity went flying out the window there. It’s a shame this guy calls himself a man of God.

  • I sent a note last Friday night to “This Week” trying to get good olde George to ask Huckabee about Dumond during his interview. No surprise he didn’t bring it up. I even sent the show a link to an article posted in an AR newspaper. Forgive but don’t forget!

  • Talk about a disconnect. The internet is full of stories about Huckabee/Dumond. And what is the lead in to Tweety’s show? Something to the effect that “Huckabee’s numbers are up across the country”. WTF. They wonder why their ratings are tanking.

  • So what if Mike let a murdering raptist go…Chuck Norris and the Nature Boy Rick Flair both say to vote for Mike…And, I do what any b-level star/has been says…O yea, in the future Chuck and the Nature Boy will supervisor Mike’s future pardons.

  • This is a good summary of the Dumond travesty, which shows such serious flaws in Huckabee’s judgment that I can’t imagine how anyone familiar with it could even consider entrusting him with our nation’s security. I also recommend the 2002 Arkansas Times piece, a thorough and well-documented exploration of why Huckabee got involved and the political shenanigans in the parole board designed to give him cover. It demonstrates beyond doubt that he is dissembling on his involvement now.

    As a side point, though, it is troubling to see more liberal or Democratic supporters try to use this in their comments here to attack conservatives (which I’m not sure Huckabee is anyway – his philosophy seems to me like a hopeless muddle). This is an example of the kind of partisan, win at any cost derangement which has infected BOTH ends of our political spectrum. Conservatives did it to Clinton, liberals to Bush; both presidencies, and more importantly THE COUNTRY, were damaged a result. Particularly repugnant is the gentleman who tried to turn it into an argument that conservative men think rape is OK, or are at least ambivalent about it. I am a conservative man, sir. And I DON’T think rape is OK – I have spent almost all of a 23 year career trying to put rapists in prison for as long as possible, as well as helping a number of law enforcement and private organizations that have substantially improved the laws and quality of investigation in rape cases in my community. The result is that we have only 1/3 as many rapes as we did 15 years ago. What, sir, have YOU done to stop rape?

  • Dumond’s wife got a job from an RNC 2004 delegate for GWB who lived in Houston. His legal offices gave her a job, and probably did some legal pro bono to help try and expedite Dumond’s release.

    Texas was the initial state listed in parole proceedings for Dumond’s departure from Arkansas. The job and support she got from a member of the Arkansas Project(a Scaife bankrolled effort to go after Clinton) gave them an excuse for Huckabee to do his plausible Christianist/Christianofascist act.

    Stuff your equivalency, John. Nothing of criticizing the current administration parallels what was done in the effort to free Dumond. Swift Boat author Jerome Coursi was even one of the persons helping drum up support for Dumond’s parole at The Free Republic. They’ve taken the measure of wiping his posts from the site now.

    Freepers are scum.

  • Comments are closed.