Homeland Security Advisor Frances Fragos Townsend was able to bamboozle reporters yesterday with bogus arguments, but today on NPR, Steve Inskeep challenged Townsend with reasonable questions — which she wasn’t able to answer.
INSKEEP: Well, you know that one of the intelligence officials that helped to draft this report has been briefing reporters, and has said that before the war in Iraq, al Qaeda had no capabilities in Iraq, and overwhelmingly now their resources are focused inside Iraq, not attacking the United States. Is that correct?
TOWNSEND: Al Qaeda’s resources are focused in Iraq because that’s where we are capturing and killing them every single day, so it drains their resources there. There’s no question that they’d like to try and extend their reach. And we see them trying to inspire like-minded affiliates, if you will, around the world in places like London and Glasgow. But they are very much tied down because we are keeping them tied down fighting them in Iraq.
INSKEEP: Is it correct that they had no capability in Iraq before the war?
TOWNSEND: I don’t know — I wasn’t at that briefing. I don’t know what the intelligence official said.
First, it’s hard not to marvel at the fact that a White House counterterrorism expert, and senior aide to the president for three years, has no idea whether al Qaeda was in Iraq before the war. (I think it’s far more likely that Townsend knows the truth, but prefers the embarrassment of ignorance to the embarrassment of reality.)
And second, what exactly did Townsend mean with the claim, “Al Qaeda’s resources are focused in Iraq because that’s where we are capturing and killing them every single day, so it drains their resources there”?
Didn’t the right give up on the “flypaper theory” a couple of years ago?