As expected, congressional Republicans were diligently crafting a plan to slash domestic spending that benefits those most in need of aid. It reminded me of an old quote that Bush would probably prefer to forget.
Republicans began targeting key programs for budget cuts yesterday, from student loans and health care to food stamps and foster care. […]
The House Ways and Means Committee today will begin drafting legislation that would save about $8 billion over five years, eight times the $1 billion target the panel was given in the spring. To do it, Chairman Bill Thomas (R-Calif.) would cut back federal aid to state child-support enforcement programs, limit federal payments to some foster care families, and cut welfare payments to the disabled.
Michele Baker, a custodian for the Orleans Parish School District, who weathered Katrina in her car, spent the aftermath in the Louisiana Superdome, and now has no job, said, “I can’t believe that some people in Washington think that, after a Category 5 hurricane, the solution is to unleash a Category 5 hurricane on working people.”
None of this comes as a terrible surprise, of course, but I can’t help but wonder where the president is on all of this. I know with some certainty, however, how candidate Bush approached issues like one.
In October 1999, Tom DeLay, Dick Armey, and other House GOP leaders were considering a measure to defer payment of the Earned Income Tax Credit to low-income workers. Bush, then the presidential front-runner, said, “I don’t think they ought to balance their budget on the backs of the poor.” (The comment prompted DeLay to say Bush “needs a little education on how Congress works.”)
The same month, Bush criticized his party again, accusing it of projecting pessimism, indifference, and “disdain for government.”
It leads me to wonder where Bush is now regarding this new round of the GOP’s war on people in poverty. Was Bush against balancing the budget on the backs of the poor before he was for it?