I have seen the future, and it is El Salvador

Guest Post by Morbo

Anyone wondering what some parts of America will look like once [tag]Roe v. Wade[/tag] is overturned needs to read Jack Hitt’s recent article in The New York Times Magazine.

Be warned, this piece is not easy going. It’s well written and extremely informative, but if you’re like me, it’s going to make you pretty angry and disgusted.

The article, titled “[tag]Pro-Life[/tag] Nation,” deals with [tag]El Salvador[/tag], where abortion is illegal for any reason. No exceptions. [tag]Abortion[/tag] is technically illegal in many South American countries, but usually enforcement is lax. Not in El Salvador. In that country, anyone who seeks an abortion, provides one or aids a woman in getting one can be imprisoned. Sentences range from two to eight years. If the [tag]fetus[/tag] is determined to have been viable, sentences are 30 to 50 years.

Medical professionals are required to report any woman they suspect might have undergone an illegal abortion. In these cases, courts can and do require women to undergo invasive examinations. In some cases, women who are suspected of receiving abortions and are recovering in hospitals are arrested and handcuffed to their beds so they can’t evade the authorities.

The system also creates a totalitarian network of informants. Women who have had illegal abortions are offered a reduced sentence if they will rat out the providers. Nurses are encouraged to report on doctors who may be providing abortions.

What most appalled me most was the way doctors in El Salvador must deal with ectopic pregnancies. In this situation, a fertilized egg moves down the fallopian tube but gets stuck there. The fetus continues to grow until the organ ruptures. Even though ectopic pregnancies cannot lead to a live birth, it is illegal in El Salvador to remove the fetus from the fallopian tube unless it is dead.

According to Sara Valdes, the director of the Hospital de Maternidad, women coming to her hospital with ectopic pregnancies cannot be operated on until fetal death or a rupture of the fallopian tube. “That is our policy,” Valdes told me. She was plainly in torment about the subject. “That is the law,” she said. “The D.A.’s office told us that this was the law.”

Valdes estimated that her hospital treated more than a hundred ectopic pregnancies each year. She described the hospital’s practice. “Once we determine that they have an ectopic pregnancy, we make sure they stay in the hospital,” she said. The women are sent to the dispensary, where they receive a daily ultrasound to check the fetus. “If it’s dead, we can operate,” she said. “Before that, we can’t.” If there is a persistent fetal heartbeat, then they have to wait for the fallopian tube to rupture. If they are able to persuade the patient to stay, though, doctors can operate the minute any signs of early rupturing are detected. Even a few drops of blood seeping from a fallopian tube will “irritate the abdominal wall and cause pain,” Valdes explained. By operating at the earliest signs of a potential rupture, she said, her doctors are able to minimize the risk to the woman.

Of course, by the time the fallopian tube ruptures, the woman has a good chance of losing a lot of blood and going into shock.

Naturally, El Salvador’s draconian law affects mostly poor women. Wealthy women in El Salvador who want abortions simply jet off to Miami.

American anti-abortion activists want exactly what El Salvador has: a ban on all abortions for any reason. They argue that if a “woman’s health” exemption is granted, doctors will use it as a loophole and keep performing most abortions.

The political leaders who back the anti-abortion movement dance all around the issue of penalties. The El Salvador experience shows that this is in no way a theoretical concern. A ban on abortions, to be effective, must be backed by vigorous enforcement. Thus, the states that ban abortion will face the same issues present in El Salvador.

Are we really going to arrest women as they lie in hospital beds? Are we going to force them to endure ectopic pregnancies until their fallopian tubes burst? Are we going to establish a network of informants in hospitals and clinics and empower courts to drag women merely suspected of having abortions into examining rooms for probing?

This may be what some people in South Dakota, Mississippi, and Utah want. It will be interesting to see how the rest of the country reacts.

I am a man, and I think that is complete bullshit. People have to understand that there is a lot of people out there that don’t share there opinion, and just because they think they are right doesn’t mean they can impose this on people who don’t. What happens next? Since they believe that they are right in worshipping a god, that if your not then something is wrong with you? I mean if they are right over this why not be right over that too? Where will it stop?

  • The nation that wisely manages its fertility will have the desired impact on its future. The ills of poverty can be lessened.

  • I remember when I was first given the assignment of teaching our university course in Demography. From my area of research I already knew a fair amount about population distribution, but little of classic Demography (mortality and fertility data and measures … plus less formal areas such as migration, labor force participation, education rates, etc.).

    When I was preparing the lectures on Fertility my eyes were almost literally peeled back. In sub-Saharan Africa the average family size (surviving children only) was just below 7.0. The factor which limited family size, in a little over half the families, was pre-mature death of the mother. The typical role of women included no education, beginning to pump out babies as soon as it was biologicallly possible, and continuing to do that until it wasn’t (usually through death of the mother). The cost, in infant mortality, childhood mortality, maternal mortality, malnutrition, disease (easily treatable but untreated) was enormous.

    Similar conditions held everywhere before the English and American Birth Control Movements got underway. Fertility advocates from the movement were routinely jailed. Their books and magazines weren’t permitted by the postal services of most countries (notoriously, in the U.S.). Birth control techniques were handed on, and practiced, in secrecy from the law (till those in the U.S. finally discovered the dodge of incorporating such knowledge in established “medical” journals).

    I came home from campus one summer day, during those prep periods, and announced that I was ill just from reading all that stuff. Also — though I was opposed to most “-isms” since my undergraduate days — that I would, henceforth, be a committed, ideological feminist, which I have remained. It’s amazing to me still, after twenty-five or so years, how much (willful, harmful) ignorance there is in this area.

    “Christians” who push laws like South Dakota’s are the furthest thing from Christ-like.

  • “Christians” who push laws like South Dakota’s are the furthest thing from Christ-like. – Ed Stephan

    The “worship” of life to a degree that life becomes unbearable and unsustainable.
    To really worship life would be to understand and support living beings. “Christians” who care less about the food, shelter, health care, education, and life expectancy, of these unwanted babies and the resulting poverty and suffering that result….are caught up in the worship of the blind act of worship.

  • When does a fertilised egg develop a heartbeat? Isn’t it after the egg has become implanted in the uterus and the egg transforms from a blastula into a fetus? So how can one monitor an ectopic pregnancy by listening for a heartbeat?

  • Many years ago I had an ectopic pregnancy. I was young and uninsured, and waited WAY too long to see a doctor. I was hospitalized immediately and given a course of antibiotic howitzers to treat the peritonitis that resulted from the burst tube. However, I developed an allergy to the medication and had to be airlifted mid-surgery to a larger facility when my lungs collapsed.

    My parents dropped everything and flew halfway across the country to be near me. The cost to my family was enormous – bills from two hospitals, Lifeflight, lost work days – all the result of my own stupidity.

    Is this one outcome the proponents of the SD law were after? It’s one they will see often.

  • I do believe this is exactly what the “christain right” / wrong want for our country. Who would have guessed our great country would be hijacked by our very own Taliban. These people are SICK!!!

  • Anybody see the piece NOW did on the South Dakota abortion ban? Chilling. The proponents of the ban are zealots – they’ve lost touch with reality. The part that really creeped me out was the Father/Daughter Abstinence Prom. Twelve and thirteen-year-old girls dressed in ball gowns and pearls, having their pictures taken with dad and reciting a pledge to refrain from sex until their wedding nights when they give themselves “as a gift” to their husbands. (No mention of the gift the husbands will be offering.)

    I can’t get past the feeling that these people just can’t stand the idea that there are people out there who actually enjoy sex and don’t feel guilty about it. And they want to punish these people in as many ways as they can. It’s sad, really. And the fact that they are getting laws on the books is nothing short of terrifying.

  • Why use Latin American countries as the example?
    Most nations in Europe have laws against abortion that are tougher than in the USA.

    Ireland doesnt allow abortions at all. Poland and Portugal have tough restrictions in the first trimester, most other countries ban it after 3 months.

    Ireland has better maternal health than the UK, where abortion is legal on demand. Poland has better maternal health than in Russia or Belarus, or the Ukraine and Russia. It is better to compare situations between countries with similiar economic situations and similar age structures to their populations.

  • Comments are closed.