I watch Dick Cheney interviews — so you don’t have to

The Vice President seems to be on some kind of publicity tour, at least by Dick Cheney’s standards. On Monday, he chatted with CBS News for 14 minutes. Yesterday, he gave CNN’s Larry King a whole hour. I’m not sure what the point of the public-relations effort is, but the interviews offer us a reminder of just how far gone the ol’ VP really is.

The King interview was chock full of interesting tidbits and exchanges. Let’s dig in, shall we? Asked about his abysmal support among Americans, Cheney said:

“The polls are notoriously unreliable, in the sense that they change all the time, they bounce around all over the place.”

Actually, the polls have been surprisingly consistent — people don’t like Cheney, his boss, or their policies.

Q In retrospect you would still go into Iraq?

CHENEY: Yes, sir.

I’m afraid anyone who could look at the catastrophe in Iraq and, even with the benefit of hindsight, would do it all again, is suffering from some kind of head trauma.

Q Wouldn’t you like to be liked?

CHENEY: Well, up to a point. But if you wanted to be liked, I should never have gotten involved in politics in the first place. Remember, success for a politician is 50 percent plus one, you don’t have to have everybody on board.

In Cheney’s case, “50% plus one” is regrettably in reference to the Supreme Court.

Q Does it bother you that the Iraqi parliament is taking August off, while men are over there? And women.

CHENEY: It’s better than taking two months off, which was their original plan. Our Congress of course takes the month of August off to go back home, so I don’t think we can say that they shouldn’t go home at all.

And if the U.S. Congress were working on measures to bring some semblance of stability to a war-torn nation in the midst of a civil war and sectarian killings, Cheney’s comparison might even make sense.

Q To which branch of government do you belong? Are you executive or legislative, or both? We were a little confused over recent statements that you’re not in either.

CHENEY: An either/or — maybe —

Q This building seems to be —

CHENEY: — say both is better.

Yes, the Vice President continues to refuse to acknowledge which branch of government he’s in.

Q Were you surprised to see [Walter Mondale’s recent criticism of what Cheney has done to the Office of the Vice President]?

CHENEY: Not especially. I don’t have any personal difficulties with Walter Mondale. Politically, we disagreed a lot. He was part of the Carter administration that I thought, frankly, was one of the less effective administrations in recent history.

Ha, ha, ha. Cheney feels like he’s in a position to criticize a presidential administration as “ineffective.” What a comedian.

Q In that regard, The New York Times — which, as you said, is not your favorite — reports it was you who dispatched Gonzales and Andy Card to then-Attorney General John Ashcroft’s hospital in 2004 to push Ashcroft to certify the President’s intelligence-gathering program. Was it you?

CHENEY: I don’t recall — first of all, I haven’t seen the story. And I don’t recall that I gave instructions to that effect.

Q That would be something you would recall.

CHENEY: I would think so. But certainly I was involved because I was a big advocate of the Terrorist Surveillance Program, and had been responsible and working with General Hayden and George Tenet to get it to the President for approval. By the time this occurred, it had already been approved about 12 times by the Department of Justice. There was nothing new about it.

Q So you didn’t send them to get permission.

CHENEY: I don’t recall that I was the one who sent them to the hospital.

First, if the TSP was the point of the Ashcroft hospital visit, Gonzales is lying. Second, his sudden memory lapse is entirely implausible.

Q The Senate Judiciary Committee is subpoenaing Karl Rove in connection with the firing of federal prosecutors. Why shouldn’t he appear?

CHENEY: There is a strong tradition that the President of the United States is entitled to have people around him who advise him who do not then have to go before the Congress and testify with respect to the advice they gave the President…. What’s the allegation of the wrongdoing here? Frankly, there isn’t anything.

First, according to the White House line, Bush wasn’t involved in the prosecutor purge scandal, so he and Rove presumably didn’t talk about anything. Second, the allegation of wrongdoing has been documented in a 52-page report (.pdf), highlighting suspected crimes associated with the U.S. Attorney firings.

Q General Powell says he would close Guantanamo yesterday. Would you?

CHENEY: No. No, I think you need to have someplace to hold those individuals who have been captured during the global war on terror.

Cheney is contradicting the official White House line, which is a stated intent to close Guantanamo.

Q A member of the Department of Defense sent Hillary Clinton a letter, saying she should not criticize, because it helps the enemy. Do you agree with that letter?

CHENEY: Didn’t say she should not criticize. She was demanding the plans for withdrawal from Iraq.

Q Do you agree with that letter?

CHENEY: I agreed with the letter Eric Edelman wrote. I thought it was a good letter.

Even Defense Secretary Gates distanced himself from Edelman’s ridiculous letter, and Cheney’s just lying about Clinton’s intent. (Indeed, the Clinton campaign had a great response to Cheney’s remarks on the subject.)

Those were just the major highlights. No startling revelations — Cheney’s breathtaking dishonest? You don’t say! — but an hour-long example of everything wrong with the Vice President’s judgment and character.

…Remember, success for a politician is 50 percent plus one…

Where did I hear that before? Oh yeah, from a political calculator here at TCR!

  • he could give Larry King three days at Blair House — it wouldn’t matter. Cheney and Dumbya are so profoundly immersed in their routine of lies and delusion that they don’t care how they answer anyone’s question. Larry could ask him if he had a wife and kids, Cheney could say no, and Larry would move on without a blink.

    I’m waiting, fruitlessly, for the day SOMEONE has the chance to nail these guys to the wall with some hard, pointed, intelligent questions …. a line of question that drills through the bald-faced lies and evasions, interrupts the subject when the question is being avoided, and pursuing and repeating a question until the questions are answered and the inconsistencies are accounted for.

    you don’t get that dogged, systemic questioning with the ‘cream of the crop’ white house reporters, and you sure ain’t gonna get it from larry.

  • Good Lord…I don’t know how you managed to watch an entire hour of this; my stomach is churning just reading the “highlights.”

    Clearly, Cheney is lying about the hospital visit. Remember that it was Cheney who did much of the briefing to the Gang of 8 on March 10, although Gonzales was present. How can anyone with a quorum of brain cells not figure out that after that meeting/briefing, Cheney said to Alberto, “Go get Ashcroft to sign off on this?”

    If he wasn’t the one who sent Gonzales, then he is protecting the person who did, because otherwise, the answer to “did you send him?” should have been “no.” But Cheney knows that the next question would be, “Well, who did?” It’s just asking too much to think anyone would believe him at that point if he said he had no idea who sent Alberto. By having a suddenly fuzzy memory, he kind of avoids going down that road. But, in one breath he is telling King that he was a big advocate of TSP, and that he had worked with Hayden and Tenet to get the program to Bush for approval in the first place, and in the next that he does not “recall” if he had instructed Gonzales to visit Ashcroft? I don’t think so.

    I think I am really tired of this administration providing us with answers and explanations that seem to assume we are all drooling idiots.

  • To be fair

    OK, to be overly generous

    You could argue that going into Iraq was the right thing to do but that we would need to change a lot of things we did because the last 4 years have been so bad that 99 out of 100 times the results of an invasion would be better than the actual reality.

    I think if I were President after the invasion that Iraq would be better off than it is today with President Bush/Cheney.

    FWIW, I think that if Paris Hilton had been President for the last 4 years that Iraq would be better off than it is today.

    So, you can still argue that going to war was the right thing to do.

  • touche, JKap, a nice catch. but I never said that was “success” – that is a bare minimum to get us back in power to stop the damage. we should certainly strive for what Cheney apparently disdains — having “everyone on board.” where your jab is more rhetorical flourish than logic is that your fringe candidates have even fewer people “on board” than the mainstream candidates. to the extent Kucinich is farther from “50% + 1” than, say, Obama, it is a mathematical truism that he is also further from uniting a broad consensus of say 75% of the country.

  • Josh has a great video of King previewing the interview with Wolfie on yesterday’s Situation Room.
    When Larry King, one one the most subject friendly softballers around, throws his hands in the air, you know you’re neck deep in BS.

    In private, Cheney’s the mad scientist in the basement laboratory. In public, he’s Bush’s ‘strong and reassuring daddy type’ that the GOP crave.

    The object of this week’s Cheney-palooza is to reassure the base that despite all that’s unravelling, daddy’s home and everything is OK.

    I don’t think it’s working.

  • timeoutofmind’s point is one I agree with strongly. It’s just amazing how milquetoast these highly-paid Washington press types are when it comes to confronting obvious spin and evasion. They just let it pass with nary a comment, leaving us groundlings to scratch our heads and wonder why the world has gone mad.

    It’s not as if this isn’t something that reporters can’t do. I’ve seen foreign broadcasters grab a question and ask pointed followups, and not allow evasions to just pass.

    If this is the best these blow-dried fops can do in conducting interviews, I say fire the lot of them.

  • jimBOB —
    you don’t understand those blow-dried fops are doing exactly what they are paid those million-dollar salaries for.

  • Anne in #3:

    I think I am really tired of this administration providing us with answers and explanations that seem to assume we are all drooling idiots.

    Not all, Anne. Just 50% plus 1.

  • In retrospect you would still go into Iraq?

    In this case, foresight was more accurate (quote from Dick Cheney, March, 1991):
    I think for us to get American military personnel involved in a civil war inside Iraq would literally be a quagmire. Once we got to Baghdad, what would we do?

  • Q To which branch of government do you belong? Are you executive or legislative, or both? We were a little confused over recent statements that you’re not in either.

    CHENEY: An either/or — maybe –

    Q This building seems to be –

    CHENEY: — say both is better

    Later in interview :
    CHENEY: No, there’s an important principle here, Larry, and that is — and a debate over what our policy ought to be is perfectly legitimate. What we don’t do is we don’t get into the business of sharing operational plans — we never have — with the Congress.

    So who’s this “we”? If it’s the royal ‘we’ of executive privilege, then he’s wearing his executive hat. So what happens to the legislative hat? Does it get put on a peg, or does it sit under the active one? Wherever he thinks he puts it, constitutionally he can’t discard it — so, he’s an integral part of congress, with whom his alter ego doesn’t “get into the business of sharing operational plans “… uuhhh??

    Sorry, schizophrenia is just too difficult for me.

  • I could suggest someplace he is welcome to put his legislative hat. or any other, for that matter. And I’d be nice enough to not suggest it on the Senate floor.

  • They just let it pass with nary a comment, leaving us groundlings to scratch our heads and wonder why the world has gone mad.-Jimbo@7

    Somebody needs to look at why building 7 fell at the WTC. No steel frame skyscraper has ever collapsed from fire before or since.

    We are all living in denial. Not just Larry King.

  • Well, up to a point. But if you wanted to be liked, I should never have gotten involved in politics in the first place. Remember, success for a politician is 50 percent plus one, you don’t have to have everybody on board.

    While that may be technically true if you want to win elections, it’s a horrific way to actually manage a country, as the past seven years have shown.

  • So we’re supposed to believe that Cheney can’t remember if he sent Gonzo to harass Ashcroft into signing off on the illegal wiretaps.

    Right.

    As Anne pointed out Clearly, Cheney is lying about the hospital visit. Remember that it was Cheney who did much of the briefing to the Gang of 8 on March 10, although Gonzales was present.

    Can someone in the press corpse please ask around to see how many people believe that the VP is not lying about this? If he is (and I doubt if many would seriously argue that he isn’t) then he’s directly involved in the attempted coverup of a large number of felonies, and that should be an impeachable crime, eh?

    Congress? Can you please uphold your oaths?

  • Dick Cheney…a “great” American.

    It is plain Dick has a pretty high opinion of his opinions…

    One day he may encounter legal proceedings that will pull back his phony self assurance of being so right…so sure of his worldview and political takes and tacks…

    Dick Cheney the warmonger is very likely a war criminal…

    In any rational,ethical,moral and truly respectful of legal process forum that conclusion surely would not be overly difficult to arrive at based on what this man concocted and orchestrated in or about American invasion and moreso the ongoing American occupation of Iraq…

    The myth that the Americans are the “good guys in the world” is fully debased by the likes of Dick Cheney.

    Larry King gave him a soft,slow of pace forum. Lets see the Dick the Coward in a forum where the questions are not soft and truth and fact of response are held to tight follow ups when answers appear doubtful…

  • …Remember, success for a politician is 50 percent plus one…

    Or, sufficient control over the voting machines plus Krazy Kat Harris.

  • Not surprising that Dick should think the Carter administration was ineffective, what with their negotiating a peace accord between Egypt and Israel, and promoting an energy policy dedicated to conservation and ending dependence on foreign oil. Pretty ineffective by the Cheney ruler of promoting war and oil company profits.

    Ya gotta love their idea of ‘tradition’. There’s supposedly a ‘tradition’ of presidential advisers not testifying before Congress, but apparently they’ve forgotten the tradition of politicians setting aside the ‘50%+1’ thinking upon taking office, and governing as statesmen for ALL the people. (Of course, at least half a dozen Clinton advisers testified. Oops. Some ‘tradition.’)

  • So last night, I switch on CNN, then I think: “What the heck I’ll just read TCR tomorrow. I’m sure there will be a post titled “I watch Dick Cheney interviews — so you don’t have to” or something like that” and promptly switch it off…

    Thanks for your dependable service, Steve.

    On the Dick interview, Larry King is the worst “follow-up” guy in TV interview history. He prepares a question in his mind, waits for the interviewee to stop talking, and just goes to the next thing without missing a heartbeat. Check out this follow-up from a few weeks ago:

    AL GORE: And of course, as you know, Larry, we’ve talked about this, that the earth’s climate really is in great jeopardy. Some of the leading scientists in the world have now said that we may have as little as 10 years in which to make major changes, lest we lose the chance to save and retrieve the favorable climate balance on which human civilization depends.

    KING: [almost interrupting] How’d you get Madonna?

  • CHENEY: I don’t recall — first of all, I haven’t seen the story. And I don’t recall that I gave instructions to that effect.
    ~~~
    Cheney pulls out the old admin. standard “don’t recall… don’t remember”. But the other “tune” the bushies continuously pull out is this “I haven’t seen/read the story/article.” SO WHAT? The interviewer has asked a question that doesn’t require the story to have been read. What a load of…

  • CHENEY: — say both is better.

    Yes, the Vice President continues to refuse to acknowledge which branch of government he’s in.

    “Both” is fine. He does indeed have duties in the White House and the Senate. It’s much better than his earlier attempt at arguing he was neither.

  • CHENEY: There is a strong tradition that the President of the United States is entitled to have people around him who advise him who do not then have to go before the Congress and testify with respect to the advice they gave the President…. What’s the allegation of the wrongdoing here? Frankly, there isn’t anything.

    This one is the best. There’s a “strong tradition”. We also have a strong tradition of congressional oversight of government activities. Guess which one is in the constitution and which one isn’t.

  • Note that on Larry King, Cheney admitted …

    (1) that the hospital visit was about the TSP, and

    (2) that he thought it was a possibility that a vice-president could issue an order to the Attorney General (whether or not he could recall if he had actually done it)

  • So, you can still argue that going to war was the right thing to do.

    If you ignore the fact it is an illegal war that was based on lies. But, I guess those kind of things don’t factor in to whether something is right or not, just how well it turns out for the US.

  • Comments are closed.