‘I’d rather die in a terrorist attack than suffer through an uncomfortable shower’ – revisited

Back in September, The Daily Show’s Jason Jones sat down with Paul Cameron, one of the nation’s leading anti-gay activists, to ask about a defense for the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. Specifically, Jones asked about Bleu Copas, a decorated sergeant and Arabic language specialist who joined the Army after the 9/11 attacks, but was thrown out for being gay, despite his role in helping translate intercepted messages from possible terrorists.

Cameron said, “I think the country, on the aggregate, is safer without Bleu in the military.” Asked why, Cameron explained, “Guys don’t want to think about other guys, other fellas, ogling them in the shower or whatever.” Jones responded, “I know I’d rather die in a terrorist attack than suffer through an uncomfortable shower with a gay.” Cameron grudgingly responded, “Yes.”

As it turns out, a new Zogby poll shows that men and women in uniform disagree.

A new poll reveals that 73% of military members say they are comfortable around lesbians and gays. And 23% say they know an active duty soldier in their unit who is lesbian or gay…. More than half — 55% — of the troops who know a gay peer said the presence of gays or lesbians in their unit is well known by others. […]

“Those who defend the law have argued that openly gay personnel harm military readiness. This research highlights the absurdity of such a hypothesis,” said C. Dixon Osburn, executive director of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network.

Only 5% of troops said they are “very uncomfortable” around gays.

For years, conservatives have said allowing gay people to wear a uniform and put their lives on the line for their country would undermine troop morale and lead to fewer Americans signing up for military service, because soldiers are ill at ease around gay people. The claim was always weak, but with poll results like these, it’s pretty thoroughly debunked.

Rep. Marty Meehan (D-Mass.), who’s leading the charge to undo the existing policy, said “These new data prove that thousands of gay and lesbian service members are already deployed overseas and are integrated, important members of their units. It is long past time to strike down ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ and create a new policy that allows gays and lesbians to serve openly.”

And what about showers?

Zogby covered that one, too.

Prominent supporters of “don’t ask, don’t tell” have expressed concerns about privacy in the shower, [Dr. Aaron Belkin, Director of the Palm Center, who has written widely on the subject] said, but nearly three out of four troops said in the Zogby poll that they usually or almost always take showers privately – only 8% say they usually or almost always take showers in group stalls.

I suppose the bottom line is that the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, in addition to being dumb, is creating a bizarre dichotomy in which gay people are already serving, but know that they are one rumor away from a discharge.

* In combat units, 21% said they know for certain that someone in their unit is gay or lesbian.

* In combat support units (25%) and combat service support units (22%) know and work alongside gays and lesbians.

* One in five troops (20%) in other units said they know for certain someone is gay or lesbian in their unit.

* Nearly half (45%) say there are people in their unit they believe to be gay or lesbian, but they don’t know for sure.

* Slightly more than half (52%) say they have received training on the prevention of anti-gay harassment in the past three years;

* However, 40% say they have not received this type of training, which is mandated by Defense Department policy.

I realize this won’t be a top policy agenda item anytime soon, but it’s still indefensible, particularly in a time of war.

Maybe what the military should consider is booting the 5% who are uncomfortable serving with gays.

  • Looks like the right will have to look for another wedge issue in a few years. Nice to hear some good news once in a while.

  • You think maybe the 5% who are “very uncomfortable” feel that way for a very specific reason, involving a metaphorical closet of some kind?

    Just a thought.

  • Why is anti-gay harassment training mandated by DoD policy when homosexuals are officially banned from service? I’m all for training, but this seems more than a bit inconsistent. If it’s such an open secret that gays are serving in the armed forces, why bother maintaining this stupid policy in the first place?

    I suppose I should know better than to look for logic or consistency in military policy.

  • You know, there are gays and straights sharing shower facilities in:

    • Every health club in America
    • Every municipal swimming pool in America
    • Every Y in America
    • Every high school gym in America
    • Every college gym in America

    Basically any public facility with a shower will have a certain percentage of its users be gay. This is just demographics. If it’s not a crisis in these other places, there’s no reason for it to be a crisis in the armed forces.

    One last point. We ask our military personnel to face snipers, IED’s, RPGs and car bombs. But we have to protect their delicate selves from ever being in a shower near somebody gay. Right.

  • ml: Maybe what the military should consider is booting the 5% who are uncomfortable serving with gays.

    … as I’m sure those 5% would not hesitate to do to gays (who probably make up 5% or more themselves) and possibly even to the other 90-something% who tolerate gays. The intolerant don’t just refuse to accept the “intolerable”; they often refuse to accept the tolerant as well.

    These primitive behavior patterns might have been well suited to the survival of small warring tribes in a long bygone era, but they threaten to annihilate us now. For better or for worse, we are a “civilized” species now and must learn to accept diversity.

  • I will never ever forgive or forget Bill Clinton’s repeatedly promising, in every major city, that his first official act as president would be to integrate the armed forces, a la Truman, then kissing bending over for Sam Nunn by adopting the policy of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”. To me that was much more hypocritical and harmful than his “lying under oath” about his own really weird and juvenile sexual behaviors.

  • Irrational thinking is the fuel of the right.
    If Cameron were really trapped on an ledge of a WTC tower, facing a choice of death by fire or taking that final dive to the pavement below, the option of taking a routine military shower with fellow troops would look pretty damn good.

  • The DoD is just a vastly ammusing place.

    Mostly because it is in fact VAST. James, there is anti-harassment training because:

    One) there is nothing against homosexuals working as DoD civilians and they deserve to be treated with respect by the uniformed,

    Two) there is nothing against homosexuals being in uniform as long as they are very very careful not to announce, admit or imply their prescence in such a way as to force a commanding officer to take notice and action.

    Of course, there are commanding officers who will go out of their way to trip up homosexuals and get them out of the unit. And considering the hierarchical structure of the military, it’s quite easy to find homophobes at SOME level of command from sergeant to general. Which is why we need a change of policy to stop this kind of selective purging of the military by sneaky sick little homophobes.

  • This is a type of civil rights/human rights issue that has been with us since mankind began. The major one is race, then color & creed (see where this is heading?). It is one of the few that is still accepted in many large circles. I’m reminded of how recently the color barrier was broken down in the military.
    Next there’s belief. I believe that this is a trait ingrained at birth, the wingnuts believe that it’s a choice. I can see why someone would choose to be one of the most persecuted & reviled minorities, can’t you? Now, let’s mix in those evangelicals working the military brass (think Air Force Academy).
    As an outsider myself (long story), I try to have the live & let live attitude, and I don’t understand the wingnut need to get into our bedrooms.
    But like some other areas (porn?), this is gaining more acceptance. But the puritans among us will continue to be outraged.
    These survey figures give me comfort that tolerance is still a value for most of America.

  • Maybe what the military should consider is booting the 5% who are uncomfortable serving with gays.
    Comment by ml

    Good point. I’m sure we could replace those 5% with good soldiers who happen to be…gay.

    Actually this is all a conspiracy to keep people out of community theater.

  • Yeah, yeah, yeah. Almost word for word the argument used first to discriminate against blacks and then for segregated units. The [white] soldiers wouldn’t feel “comfortable” around the black ones. Proving once again that bigotry and originality are oxymorons. Some comedian once posited that the reason for discrimination in the military stemmed from the fear of what would happen when people who got their faces ground learned to use machine guns. (“What was that about queers, arsehole?”)

    Here’s a thought: The US is one of the few western countries with this type of policy. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation_and_military_service) Most of the coalition members, including the diehards (UK and Australia) don’t discriminate. If the theory is fighting with or near gay soldiers will so distract the troops they’ll stand there going “Eeew!” while they get shot, shouldn’t the US tell the UK and Oz (and everyone else) to withdraw now?

    I heartily second ml’s suggestion. Anyone that stupid shouldn’t be allowed to waste a uniform.

  • “As it turns out, a new Zogby poll shows that men and women in uniform disagree”

    Let’s see the pundits spin THIS one.

    “Zogby isn’t reliable”

    “They only polled women, who are more tolerant of gays”

    “They only polled National Guard units from blue states”

    “The military has a well-known liberal bias”

  • This is a type of civil rights/human rights issue that has been with us since mankind began. The major one is race, then color & creed (see where this is heading?).

    Actually, as the list of what is alright to be a bigot about grows shorter, I guess creed is going to be making a comeback. How long will it be before wingnut Christian soldiers will be “uncomfortable” serving with non-Christians?

  • Do we really need a bunch of girly men serving in the military? We don’t require women soldiers to shower with men (the opposite gender) so why would we tolerate gays showering with what to them are the opposite gender (other men)?

  • “The military has a well-known liberal bias” – 2Manchu

    The U.S. Military is collectively a bunch of idiots. Fortunately hierarchical structures and levels of command allow an occasional flash of brilliance when it is actually needed.

    God, that sounds practically Clausewitzian 😉

  • “Do we really need a bunch of girly men serving in the military?” – David

    The thing is that not all homosexuals are effeminate. As far as I’ve ever noted (from afar) plenty of them easily meet the physical and psychological requirements to carry a weapon and use it.

  • what jimBOB said in comment #5. 100%

    I know if I ever took a shower at the gym and got looked at by a gay man I would become gay and start buying (but not snorting) meth.

    I hope we do eventually elect an openly gay person President, because the wingnuts’ heads will all explode.

  • Moses: I still blame all of this hubub on community theater …

    Nah.

    Teletubbies – Racerx

    Both wrong – it’s a conspiracy among the agri-business producers of soy.

  • Do not feed the troll. It might follow you home.
    Comment by The answer is orange

    True. Art K. lost interest and went away when he/she wasn’t responded to.

  • Comments are closed.