‘If It’s Sunday, It’s Still Conservative’

About a year ago, [tag]Media Matters[/tag] released a fascinating report called, “If It’s Sunday, It’s Conservative.” MM found that the Sunday-morning [tag]talk shows[/tag] on ABC, CBS, and NBC, which play a huge role in shaping the conventional wisdom and prevailing political opinions, feature more conservative voices than liberal, “in some cases, dramatically so.” What’s more, MM found that it was a trend that was getting worse — a slight Republican/conservative advantage in the Clinton years had grown considerably worse under Bush.

But, for most of the last six years, Democrats have been locked out of the power structure almost entirely. If the Sunday-morning shows wanted to hear from political figures who would shape policy, and political pundits with insights into what was going to happen next, it meant stacking the deck in the GOP’s favor.

Surely, after the Dems won a stunning number of races in the midterm elections, and now control both chambers in Congress, the Sunday shows will reflect the Dems’ new-found clout and significance, right? Wrong.

On the Sunday after the midterm elections, in which Democrats took control of Congress for the first time in a dozen years, viewers tuned in to NBC’s Meet the Press to hear what the Democratic win meant for the country — only to discover that host Tim Russert did not have any Democrats on at all. Instead, Russert’s guests were Republican Sen. John McCain (AZ) and Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (CT), who ran in the general election as an Independent after losing the Democratic primary. And after an election in which the public’s opposition to the Iraq war was a central issue, Meet the Press hosted two guests who support the war.

But that incident is hardly an aberration. In a new report by Media Matters for America — If It’s Sunday, It’s Still Conservative: How the Right Continues to Dominate the Sunday Talk Shows, we show that the Sunday shows — Meet the Press, ABC’s This Week, CBS’ Face the Nation, and Fox Broadcasting Co.’s Fox News Sunday — have consistently given Republicans and conservatives an edge over their Democratic and progressive counterparts in the last two years, the period of the 109th Congress. And, as our analysis shows, the recent shift in power in Washington has yielded mixed results, at best.

That Meet the Press episode MM references was particularly offensive. At the end of the non-Democratic guests’ appearances, Russert went out of his way to mention that he had invited Nancy Pelosi and/or Harry Reid to appear on the show. Both declined (they’d already accepted offers from other programs). But instead of extending invitations to other Democrats, just days after the party’s dramatic victories, Meet the Press chatted with a Republican and an independent.

Let’s all say it together: What [tag]liberal media[/tag]?

After last year’s Media Matters report was published, I almost expected bookers and producers to be shamed into making at least some improvements to their line-ups. After Dems won back Congress, I figured they’d have no choice. But progress has been slow, to put it mildly.

Despite previous network claims that a conservative advantage existed on the Sunday shows simply because Republicans controlled Congress and the White House, only one show, ABC’s This Week, has been roughly balanced between both sides overall since the congressional majority switched hands in the 2006 midterm elections.

Since the 2006 midterm elections, NBC’s Meet the Press and CBS’ Face the Nation have provided less balance between Republican and Democratic officials than Fox Broadcasting Co.’s Fox News Sunday despite the fact that Fox News Sunday remains the most unbalanced broadcast overall both before and after the election.

During the 109th Congress (2005 and 2006), Republicans and conservatives held the advantage on every show, in every category measured. All four shows interviewed more Republicans and conservatives than Democrats and progressives overall, interviewed more Republican elected and administration officials than Democratic officials, hosted more conservative journalists than progressive journalists, held more panels that tilted right than tilted left, and gave more solo interviews to Republicans and conservatives.

Now that Congress has switched hands, one would reasonably expect Democrats and progressives to be represented at least as often as Republicans and conservatives on the Sunday shows. Yet our findings for the months since the midterm elections show that the networks have barely changed their practices. Only one show – ABC’s This Week – has shown significant improvement, having as many Democrats and progressives as Republicans and conservatives on since the election. On the other three programs, Republicans and conservatives continue to get more airtime and exposure.

If I didn’t know better, I might start to think the “liberal media” isn’t that liberal at all.

For what it’s worth, Media Matters is accepting signatures for a project which would “urge the networks to make their Sunday shows more balanced.” Take a look.

Don’t say “What liberal media?” assert this is pro-conservative bias, or accept this will ever get better.

  • Is because we are all too tired after those Saturday night orgy’s in baby’s blood to make the talk show circuit on Sunday.

  • So what do the people who hold the most intellectual weight in liberal politics think is going on? Do the liberal think-tank fellows think that this is some kind of coincidence that’s worth ignoring to read some journal articles?

  • The liberal media knows that it’s so liberal that it needs to balance itself out with extra GOP talking heads. And since they’re so moderate, it takes a lot of them to balance out the liberal shrillness.

    And don’t forget, Karl Rove and the other moderate GOP spinmeisters are always willing to explain to us what the Democratic position is, so who needs all those Democrats to come on the show anyway?

  • Racerx #4, that’s what I was thinking about David Brooks. They don’t get to explain liberals. They can’t do it intellectually or honestly.

  • Off Topic, but a year or so ago I sent a letter to Air America suggesting they get a liberal preacher on Sunday — helping show that liberals aren’t all heathens and potentially creating a media star who could go on shows and talk about issues of morality from a liberal perspective.

    My vote was for Jon Dobrer — you can hear tapes of his sermons (without notes!) at uufullerton.org.

  • Two points–first the snark: Why aren’t all those Rethug pols in church on Sunday morning? They are encourgaging the godless to stay home and worship Bush. Second, the constructive idea: Let’s stop calling it the “so-called liberal media” and start calling it what it is–the conservative, corporatist media.

  • The blogosphere doesn’t need to kowtow to the printed press (which nobody reads anyway). Nor does it need “fair and balanced” any more (gasbags, like the print journalists, are fast becoming boring jokes).

    Direct communication of non-triangulated thought — through the blogosphere and face to face — is going to win this country back for the Democratic Party. Americans basically all want the same things, and very few people are either rich enough or mean enough to have their real interests met by the GOP. The internet is also slowly grinding down regional and religious prejudices.

    If the mainstream media don’t want to adapt to the direct, interpersonal culture which is emerging via the internet, they’ll lose. Simple as that. The corporate owners have to seel ads, but they can’t if nobody’s paying attention.

  • One is surprised that General Electric News (NBC) and Viacom News (CBS) aren’t liberal???

    There was a very good analysis done a few years back of Russert: graduate of a conservative Catholic education in high school and college, generally considered conservative by his co-workers despite his “independent” registration. He had McCain and Lieberman on because he needed to belittle the results of the election.

    Move along folks, nothing to see here, no suprises anywhere…

  • I’m curious what the ratings have been for the jabbering Sunday shows. I watch This Week sometimes, but the others? blcccht. Even when I do happen to ‘watch’ it’s generally on in the background as I read more fact based opinion on line. I find Zakaria (sp?) to be interesting, even when I disagree, but the rest? I mean – Will, Cokie, Russert? Why even bother? You can predict what each will say to a degree that almost elevates them to stale comedy.

  • How Russert still has a job after the Libby trial is beyond me. To have a staff member of Dick Cheney’s basically say that Timmeh was a lapdog of the administration and the absolute best arena to control the message (even more so than Fox?!?), he should have his head shaved and be drummed out of his profession. Russert’s cover is gone and MTP has been exposed as home sweet home for any Bush scofflaw who wants safe harbor to spin things their way. Russert doesn’t even possess the dignity to at least paste a veneer of impartiality on his program anymore. What a sellout that poseur is.

  • Corpirate sycophants who only want to hear their own rhetoric.
    This is the new grand propaganda for the masses, shows which are a mere reflections of their masters minds.

    OK, I exaggerate, but I get this feeling that the folk participating in this crap have a juvenile smugness about what they do, getting revenge from an age old schoolyard prank, …they’re the rich kid who threatens to take take his ball home if you don’t let him win.
    We took his ball.

  • “If it’s Sunday, it’s the McCain-Lieberman-Rice-Hadley super-fun happy panda propoganda hour”

    – Tim Russert

  • The Libby trial showed us that, for decades, the NY Times, Washington Post and Meet the Press are, and have been, the official mouthpieces for whichever administration is in power.

    So how the hell does that make ‘the media’ liberal?

    In my Montgomery County, Md. public schools, we were always led to believe that the relationship between the press and the government was arm’s-length and adversarial, a la Jack Anderson(sp?), the Woodward of old, and earlier ‘muckrakers,’ like Upton Sinclair.

    I cancelled my 25-year NYT subscription after learning that they’d withheld the NSA wiretapping story for 14 months, thus throwing the election.

    My great disillusionment has been that the fourth estate, liberal or conservative, is decidedly NOT on my side.

    ~

  • Comments are closed.