‘I’m not whining’

I’m embarrassed to admit that I foolishly believed congressional Republicans were no longer capable of surprising me. Looking back over the last 12 or so years, I naively assumed there were some tactics even the congressional GOP wouldn’t try.

I stand corrected.

Thirty-one-year-old Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) is not a large man, standing perhaps 5 feet 3 inches tall in thick soles. But he packed a whole lot of chutzpah when he walked into the House TV gallery yesterday to demand that the new Democratic majority give the new Republican minority all the rights that Republicans had denied Democrats for years.

“The bill we offer today, the minority bill of rights, is crafted based on the exact text that then-Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi submitted in 2004 to then-Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert,” declared McHenry, with 10 Republican colleagues arrayed around him. “We’re submitting this minority bill of rights, which will ensure that all sides are protected, that fairness and openness is in fact granted by the new majority.”

Omitted from McHenry’s plea for fairness was the fact that the GOP had ignored Pelosi’s 2004 request — while routinely engaging in the procedural maneuvers that her plan would have corrected…. Anne Kornblut of the New York Times asked McHenry if his complaint might come across as whining.

“I’m not whining,” he whined.

Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Tex.) added, “Washington, D.C. has just enacted a smoking ban, yet somehow Nancy Pelosi and her liberal colleagues have found a way to lock themselves in a smoky backroom in the Capitol to make deals for the next two years.”

As Paul Kiel asked, “Is there such a thing as irony-deafness?”

We’re not just talking about a few right-wing backbenchers hoping to give talk radio something to complain about. As Kiel noted, even House Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), who was largely responsible for making sure House Dems were neither seen nor heard the past several years, issued a kvetching press release, complaining that the Dems are “denying the citizens of this country an open, honest discussion of the issues” during the first 100 hours of the 110th Congress.

My favorite complaint came by way of Rep. Adam Putnam, chairman of the House Republican Conference, who whined, “Half of the Congress has been cut out of the process.” Putnam, of course, was in the leadership last year, ensuring that half of the Congress was cut out of the process.

To their credit, reporters covering the Hill aren’t stupid.

It fell to CNN’s Dana Bash to point out the awkward truth. “You can play back, almost verbatim, Democrats . . . saying almost exactly what you all just said,” she said. “So is there a little bit of hypocrisy in you saying that you want minority rights?”

“This is a missed opportunity to really change the way that the House does business,” Putnam offered, citing Democrats’ campaign promises for “a new way of doing business.”

“What stopped you from taking that opportunity when you were still in the majority?” inquired Rick Klein of the Boston Globe.

Funny, none of them wanted to answer that one.

Kudos to Chief Deputy Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) for making the bold concession:

When asked why Republicans were now endorsing proposals they long ignored, incoming Chief Deputy Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) conceded the GOP had erred last year.

“In hindsight, I think [Pelosi] was right,” Cantor told reporters.

Hindsight is a powerful force, isn’t it?

shamelessness is a critical component of the modern republican mindset.

  • In hindsight, Republicans coming into power was a disastrous idea. See that it never happens again.

  • Putting the Republicans’ transparently cynical hypocrisy aside, what do you think of the minority bill of rights? What, exactly, does it provide for? Assuming the terms are reasonable, it doesn’t strike me as necessarily a bad idea to provide for some degree of formal institutional recognition of the rights of the minority; it may well work in the Democrats’ favor at some point in the future, and in the short term it gives them the opportunity to take the high ground and distinguish their new majority from the Republicans’ 12-year tenure (and, for that matter, from the old Democratic majority). Giving the Republicans more than they deserve, certainly, but it might be good for Congress and the nation in the long run.

  • I think it is too much to ask of anti-intellectuals that they think. For Republicans it has been and always will be that they grab power and exercise it to the advantage of their tribe, the plaid pantsed white-shoed golfers.

  • I think the Democrats should keep the old (i.e. DeLay-designed, to screw the minority) rules in effect this year, so the bastards can experience the bitter taste of powerlessness in full. If they can get major legislation passed and enacted in 2007, then next year, when Congress won’t do anything anyway because it’s an election, they can re-empower the minority.

    I have less than no sympathy for the claim that “half the Congress” is cut out of decision-making. I live in New York; for the last six years, half the country, very prominently including my city, has had effectively zero representation within the federal government. Suck on it, boys.

  • Hindsight? Well they talk out their hineys, they may as well look out them too since their heads are already up there.

  • Let the Republicrooks get all their people to sign onto the idea, and pledge to keep it in force even if they regain the majority. If they can’t do that, then they’re hypocrites, so screw ’em.

    And/or maybe… make the “Minority Bill Of Rights” operable upon the beginning of the next congress? If that’s not good enough, see Dick Cheney’s advice to Leahy.

  • Man, where did the adults go ?? Is this their big plan; what they have been working on during the off season. Should we expect more from this play book.

    It should be done, but let’s do Pelosi’s version, and let’s wait a bit, at least until we get the 100 hour plan done, say in about 18 months, close to the election.

  • I am actually for “minority rights”. Members must be allowed to submit amendments, this of course doesn’t mean they will succeed.

    So I say that the matter should be considered AFTER the “100 hours”.
    They had plenty of time to consider the 100 hour bills in the 109th . but chose not to.

    Don’t you just love the whiny crybabies…… I am waiting for Coulter to make a comment about this so we can replay her rant on Insanity and Colmes where she said “Someone should tell the dems that the winners make the laws, not the losers”

    Must search youtube for the clip

  • “I’m not whining,” he whined.

    Touche! Olbermann has been a good influence on Dana Milbank

  • Th miorty party rights bil should be renamed “The Reversal of Republican Perversions of Democracy” bill and extensive floor debate should be held with many Dems testifying on CSPAN to the abuses of power under the Repubs.

    McHenry and his boys need to be put in their place with a Democrat publicly saying the reason they are bitching are from the rules they themsleves enacted, permitted to stay in place and used with malice and impunity.

  • If you don’t like getting punched, don’t sit there getting pummelled hoping these ass holes will be moved once they get a look at your bloated and bleeding eyes. You punch them back. Hard. Then ask if they want to start acting like human beings.

    Of course they’re hypocritical. Hypocrisy, to them, is just another way of saying they believe in market forces. Whining about fairness and consistency sounds like cries of the weak to their ears; it means they have what it takes to survive. In the same way, bipartisanship and civility is just another way of telling us to unilaterally disarm. It’s Rochambo, where they kick you in the nuts, then say lets make up and be friends when its your turn to get a swing at their ball-sack.

    These people worship greed and the ruthless, cynical pursuit of self-interest as a religion, and call us partisan shrills if we point out they said so. What’s going to keep them from bringing back the same rules that benefited them so well when they return to power? Hypocrisy? Civility? Fairness? Of course they will, so long as they’re the only ones who ever get to do the kicking. I say, one swift kick to the groin is a good way to open a discussion on how to return civility to Washington.

  • The question from the Media, and Democrats, in response should be “Why should the Democrats provide you with Minority rights when you refused to provide it to them?” Until they actually answer the question, which would require an apology, then they don’t get them.

  • Play by the (traditional) rules. The CSA/GOP will screw itself as usual.

    But please, Democrats, for just this once, don’t bend over backwards (or forwards) out of a misguided sense of what constitutes fair play. As the servants of Big Business and so-called corporate ethics, the GOP will always take every advantage they can, legal or not. I’m not saying we should be the competitive beasts/weasels they are, but we shouldn’t keep being suckers either.

  • I’m kind of sorry that the Democrats couldn’t enact the “Minority Rights” rules immediately. Of course the reason they couldn’t is that the Republican’ts as much as bragged they would use them to stop everything the Democrats wanted to do.

    Now McWhinny and crowd complain. They should have shut up their own caucus members who were out there spilling the plans to screw America.

  • McHenry, banging spoon on high-chair: “I want my Mapo! I want it… I want it… I want it!”

  • Ever notice how the playground bully always whines about the kid who gave him a bloody nose and toppled his reign of error?

    As far as rights for that little pissant and his fellow sandbox bullies goes, all Democrats need remember is the advice of a Democrat who routinely whipped Republican’s asses for 30 years – my great grand-uncle Jim McKelvey: “the only ‘good Republicans’ are pushing up daisies.”

  • James Dillon

    …it may well work in the Democrats’ favor at some point in the future…

    Or not. The GOP would just dissolve (or ignore) any minority bill of rights as soon as they were in the majority. I like the suggestion that *after* the 100 hours bills are voted on, each and every Republican’t in the House will have the opportunity to state in detail how poorly the GOP behaved since 1994, each congresscritter citing one from a rotating list of examples of this behavior and how they will not support any GOP leaders in revoking a minority bill of rights in the future. *After* every single one of the Republican’ts have done this on camera, then we can pass the minority bill of rights. Only then.

    It just makes me smile to think of this happening, even though I know its pure fantasy.

  • What, you can’t TRUST the Democrats to be fair?

    All of a sudden, having a document that protects your rights from being stomped on is an important issue with Republicans?

  • Everyone knows that “McFood” is fattening, and “Pat the Petty” needs to know that Congress is going on a diet for two years. Think of it as “a doctor telling the patient to cut back on the neocon-lesterol…..”

  • “All of a sudden, having a document that protects your rights from being stomped on is an important issue with Republicans?” – 2Manchu

    Offer them a copy of the Constitution and tell them you’ll think about giving them “minority rights” as soon as they support respecting Americans’ rights. 😉

  • Too little, too late for Republican’ts.

    Though I must say that it is quite funny hearing the phrase “minorities rights” come out of Republican’t mouths. Maybe when the discriminatory voting rights laws around the (southern part of the) country change, we can discuss minority rights in Congress.

    should be renamed “The Reversal of Republican Perversions of Democracy” bill and extensive floor debate should be held with many Dems testifying on CSPAN to the abuses of power under the Repubs.

    I agree!!! Or better yet, leave it named as is “Minority Rights”, have extensive floor debate with tetimonies of Repub abuse of power and then….Vote it down.

  • I learned at a young age that with rights come responsibilities. Six years of irresponsible behavior may preclude the Repubs from being able to exercise their rights, just as folks who commit crimes are denied certain rights as punishment for their demonstrated lack of judgment in using their rights before.

  • Well… I guess that’s the way things so when the PEOPLE voted for someone ELSE to be in charge. The Republicans had their chance – with virtual control over every branch of the Federal government – and look what a mess they’ve made of it all… and now they cry for a “minority bill of rights” – ??!?? – the irony is just – PATHETIC.

  • John Edwards knows a lot about poverty, after all, he’s helped throw a lot of people into it, with:

    – his co-sponsorship of H-1b visas,

    – his support for illegal aliens,

    – his vote for MFN-China

    but what about stuff like iraq war and the patriot act?

    well, he voted for them too

    About the only thing you can say for Edwards is, he spent so much time running for president that he didnt have time to do more damage as senator

    You’ve got to ask yourself – ‘what did he do, with the power he had, when he had it?

  • John Edwards was a SENATOR, dude, and this conversation is about the HOUSE. What John Edwards has or hasn’t done is immaterial to the subject at hand.

    It truly is a wonder that any Republican’t is able to get himself dressed every morning without help from somebody smarter than him.

  • Comments are closed.