Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, but…

To hear the McCain campaign tell it, Barack Obama is just wrong. He’s offering the wrong solutions and he’s asking the wrong questions.

It’s curious, then, that McCain has taken to emulating Obama’s campaign so carefully.

The general election is now in full speed — just check out the competing slogans.

Republican John McCain has transformed rival Barack Obama’s slogan of “Change We Can Believe In” into his own line, “A Leader We Can Believe In.”

“Transformed” is an interesting euphemism. After over a year of seeing Obama run on “Change We Can Believe In,” the McCain campaign’s decision to run on “A Leader We Can Believe In” seems kind of cheap.

It’s almost as if there was a staff meeting at McCain campaign headquarters, and someone said, “We could probably use a campaign slogan.” Someone else said, “Well, Obama’s doing pretty well. Why don’t we just appropriate his?”

Someone at the same meeting may have also suggested that it’s time for a new logo. Obama uses white letters against a blue backdrop. McCain now uses white letters against a blue backdrop. Obama’s logo shows a blue sky, with red and white stripes under a sun on the horizon. McCain now uses a logo with a blue sky, with red and white stripes under a sun on the horizon.

What a remarkable coincidence. It’s not like McCain, with no real ideas or core convictions of his own, would just try to copy the inexperienced candidate he disdains, would he?

For that matter, McCain isn’t just borrowing Obama’s slogan, branding, and logo, he’s even trying to borrow Obama’s theme. From his now-infamous green speech near New Orleans this week:

“This is, indeed, a change election. No matter who wins this election, the direction of this country is going to change dramatically. But, the choice is between the right change and the wrong change.”

In all, McCain used the word “change” 33 times in a relatively brief speech.

Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, but this is ridiculous. McCain is supposed to be the experienced candidate, who’s been around forever, and who’s seen and done it all before. McCain’s his own man, running his own campaign on his own terms.

And he’s doing so while copying Barack Obama as closely as he can? It doesn’t speak well of the McCain campaign’s confidence in the candidate’s abilities.

Meh, who cares if he’s copying Obama. Much better to mock him as a “change” agent when, as you say, he’s been around forever, is of the same party as the incumbent, and pretty much agrees with the incumbent on the important issues of the day.

  • When is the last time McCain actually won a competitive campaign?

    The rest of the field in the GOP primary self destructed (I’m not actually sure what happened to Romney, I’m hoping it wasn’t the Mormon thing).

    He lost in 2000 to GWB.

    Has he had a real fight for his senate seat recently?

  • I think that the McCain Food Company should sue McCain for stealing their logo design.

    It looks too damn similar.

    More like Plagiarism you can believe in.

  • Hey, everyone knows that old guys who have been in power forever like to change the status quo, right? I’m sure Gramps has just been biding his time, waiting til he could change all that stuff he’s been supporting since he got into the senate.

    ROFLMAO.

  • What I love about the “transformed” slogan is that it goes straight for the authoritarian cultist “leader” principle. Rather than asking for people to believe in their own capacity to come together and make change, McCain asks for personal veneration, and to be given the authority to impose change from the top down. It’s the military mindset presented as a civilian governing model.

  • Change We Can Believe In” into his own line, “A Leader We Can Believe In.”

    This is perfect. The quasi-fascists stress the “leader” and Obama stresses the “change”. The paradox is that I think Obama will be a great leader, but he’ll be the kind of leader we can believe in. McCain won’t.

  • He could have gone from “Change We Can Believe In” to “Change We Can Depend On”, but I’m afraid people would have started throwing Depend diapers on stage.

  • He has nothing to run on. No ideas, no policy changes, nothing.

    He’s not experienced he merely has a reputation like an odd shaped rock casting a shadow at a certain time for the past 70+ years, given him by himself and steno’d by the press.

    He’s about as maverick as a mocking bird. Anyone voting for that man has got serious reality issues.

  • Seriously, he should simply change his slogan to “You Kids Get Off My Lawn.” At this point something so bad and shockingly bad it’s good would probably be the best thing for him.

  • This is perfect. The quasi-fascists stress the “leader” and Obama stresses the “change”. -Dale

    Good observation. Not entirely unlike Lieberman’s ‘Connecticut for Lieberman’ instead of ‘Lieberman for Connecticut.’ They cons seem to always put the emphasis on themselves personally.

  • Don’t you see? It’s all part of the plan! Viewers will be confused by the logos and slogans and completely fail to notice that they’re being lectured by an old white man instead of a younger black man!

    Genius!

  • Jeesh, I just googled Depend diapers to see if they had a slogan McCain could copy. Turns out a bunch of other people made the same suggestion for McCain that I did in #8. Please don’t call me a gooper. I didn’t mean it. 🙁

  • And our first finalist for Line of the Day is doubtful @7.
    funny funny stuff.

  • #7 doubtful, I was thinking it was more like a Bob Dole kind of old. The difference is that Reagan won a presidential election.

  • It could be a deliberate ploy to muddy the campaign waters. Obama’s campaign is about contrast — “change” contrasted with “more of the same”. By copying the look of Obama’s campaign, McCain dulls that contrast, at least superficially. Voters are left with the feeling that the candidates are mostly the same, except one has more experience than the other (and is white).

  • Danp said:
    He could have gone from “Change We Can Believe In” to “Change We Can Depend On”, but I’m afraid people would have started throwing Depend diapers on stage.

    Elvis used to smell the scarves that women threw on stage. McCain?

    Warning to McCain speech writers: Do not inadvertently use the the phrase “in continents”

  • Well, he’s such a green candidate, he’s just recycling.

    How long before the media starts accusing Obama of copying McSame?

    (And thanks for the laugh, Doubtful @7.)

  • I don’t interpret that as a sun on Obama’s logo but rather as the center of the “O”.

  • Eh, Dale stole my thunder. I also found it interesting that Republicans’ slogan-meisters gravitated towards the word “leader,” because they SO love being led. Cuts down on that whole thinking-for-yourself thing they hate to consider.

    Can’t remember exactly where, but I vaguely remember, I think in Florida, the state or a local government spending tax dollars after Election 04 to hang a giant billboard of George Bush with the words “Our Leader” next to it. Big brouhaha at the time. But I guess someone figured, if we didn’t point out Bush was the president…I dunno…we might forget?

  • In the “green screen” speech in New Orleeeaaahhns, let’s look at the rhetorical quandary he faced – McCain is stealing the “change” theme, and also the “we believe in” theme, but he is stealing them separately.

    So as he was ending the speech, the obvious finish would have been:

    “And that, my friends, is the kind of change we can believe in.”

    But that would have been too obvious to many who haven’t noticed the plagiarism yet. Hence the unbelievably weak flourish:

    “And that, my friends, is the kind of change… we need right now.”

  • Dale said: Elvis used to smell the scarves that women threw on stage. McCain?

    Coffee, meet monitor. That totally cracked me up.

  • New Orleeeaaahhns

    That’s how many residents of the city pronounce it. Four syllables rather that three. It’s also closer to how the French pronounce the name of their city, Orleans.

  • Take a look at the links to see how similar the new McCain stuff is. Even the font is copied.

    I think the most interesting part is that he basically lifted Obama’s “Change you can believe in” and replaced “Change” with “Leader”. It just further highlights how authoritarian that Republicans have become, and how McCain has abandoned any pretense of being a “maverick” in favor of taking up the mantle of the party’s authoritarian leader, basically Bush III.

  • McCain has gotten an even smaller feller with a broom, and he’s claiming he wants to get some of that reform for himself.

    Boys, they are a bunch of Johnnie-come-latelys!!

    Oooo, Johnnie-come-lately McBush. Sounds about right to me!

  • The difference between the two slogans may appear small, word-wise, but they are huge, ideology-wise.

    The Obama campaign has been all about empowering people to run things, “Change WE can believe in.”

    The McCain campaign is the standard-issue far right authoritarian campaign: “A LEADER we can believe in.”

    Ein Reich! Ein Volk! Ein Fuhrer!!

    Just remember, “Der Fuhrer” translates as “the leader.”

    Republican voters are sheep looking to be sheared.

  • The emulation goes further. I looked at John McCain’s web site a couple of months ago. It was a joke. The background was black. There was no color. Well, all of that has changed. There are youtube links and facebook links – none of that was present back in February or March.

  • don’t you people know that the commander in chief has inherent authority to use trademarks and appropriate copyrights in a time of war. it’s like you’ve never read that Constitution thing.

  • Nerp: So you’re saying McCain can steal Obama’s branding because of presumptive executive privilege. It’s so crazy, it just might work!

  • bush was just the decider – mccain is the decider and the infringer! he’s got a cape an’ mask an’ everything. for crying out loud people, this man has already preemptively won the presidency – show some respect!

  • Consider a doddering old McCaniac in the White House imitating Ford and pardoning the Bush/Cheney criminal organization “so the country can move on” or some other bullshit excuse.

  • Red, white, and blue is a fairly common color scheme for presidential elections. Nothing new there. I’ve noticed that the most common candidate sign colors are a blue background with white lettering. It’s just a good color combination, noticeable without eing overly bright.

    With that said, it is strange that McCain has waited this long to adopt the standard patriotic motif. A week or so ago his website was neutral grey. His website has now been completely reworked for the general election. Amusingly, the first thing you land on after going to johnmccain.com is a page asking for a contribution, with no obvious way to continue without doing so. I retyped the address in order to get to the main site. Maybe this is something that only happens the first time you load the page? (That seems counter productive to first time viewers trying to figure out where McCain stands on issues). Obama at least has a fairly large link in the upper right corner allowing you to skip the donation and go to the website.

    I didn’t see anything in McCain’s logo that resembled the ‘sun’ used by Obama, just a blue sky with red and white stripes leading into the horizon. That would have been a little too much like Obama’s logo and it wouldn’t have made sense for McCain. Like another commenter, I’ve always viewed Obama’s sun logo as a play on the letter O.

    The tagline is a completely differrent story and was straight up copied from Obama, with only a single word change. It reminds me of elementary school research papers, where you would try to rewrite what the reference said so that it wouldn’t be plagerism.

    Some thought has obviously put into McCain’s new website. If he was trying to rebrand himself, wouldn’t it have made sense to put an equal amount of thought into his tagline?

  • I’m a white American born Republican and will alway be one but for this particular season I will vote Barack Obama he creative and ready age is nothing in this Americans looks into issues, remeber you cant teach an old dog new tricks

    Roy Colman

  • Comments are closed.