In Bush’s Justice Department, being gay is ‘even worse than being a Democrat’

About a year ago, we learned in jaw-dropping detail about the questions asked of those seeking employment at Bush’s Justice Department. Thanks to Alberto Gonzales and Monica Goodling — remember them? — job applicants for civil service jobs were quizzed with all kind of personal questions that the DoJ couldn’t legally ask. This went well beyond just isolating registered Democrats as inherently untrustworthy — though Goodling did that, too — and included one applicant being asked, “Have you ever cheated on your wife?”

But what about all of those Justice Department employees who were already on staff when Goodling & Co. got there? It was too late to ask them personal questions during their interviews. How, then, could they ensure that DoJ employees were pure by conservative Republican standards?

Apparently, they found ways. (via Paul Kiel)

The Justice Department’s inspector general is investigating whether a career attorney in the department was dismissed from her job because of rumors that she is a lesbian. The case grew out of a larger inquiry into the firings of U.S. attorneys and politicization at Justice under former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Several people interviewed by the inspector general’s staff described the case to NPR and said they came away with the impression that the Attorney General’s office decided not to renew Leslie Hagen’s contract because of the talk about her sexual orientation. Hagen received the highest possible ratings for her work as liaison between the Justice Department and the U.S. attorneys’ committee on Native American issues. Her final job evaluation lists five categories for supervisors to rank her performance. For each category, a neat X fills the box marked, “Outstanding.” And at the bottom of the page, under “overall rating level,” she also got the top mark: Outstanding.

The form is dated February 1, 2007. Several months before that evaluation, Hagen was told her contract would not be renewed.

After Hagen won awards for her work as a federal prosecutor, former U.S. Attorney Tom Heffelfinger recruited her to DC for her job, because, as he put it, she was “the best qualified person in the nation.” Everyone Hagen worked with raved about her amazing work and her supervisors were anxious to renew her contract.

But as we know all too well, in the Bush administration, qualifications and outstanding on-the-job performance hardly matter.

Justice Department e-mails obtained by NPR show that Gonzales’s senior counsel Monica Goodling had a particular interest in Hagen’s duties. A few months before Hagen was let go, according to one e-mail, Goodling removed part of Hagen’s job portfolio — the part dealing with child exploitation and abuse. […]

[B]y all accounts, Hagen was a GOP loyalist. So, what was Goodling’s problem with Hagen?

The Justice Department’s inspector general is looking into whether Hagen was dismissed after a rumor reached Goodling that Hagen is a lesbian. As one Republican source put it, “To some people, that’s even worse than being a Democrat.”

Several people interviewed by the inspector general’s staff said investigators asked whether people drew a connection between the rumors and Hagen’s dismissal. The witnesses, who spoke to NPR on the condition of anonymity, said they felt that the rumors led to the decision not to renew Hagen’s contract.

Someone who worked in Hagen’s office says that in a 2006 meeting, senior officials were told that Hagen’s contract would not be renewed because someone on the attorney general’s staff had a problem with Hagen. The problem, it was suggested during the conversation, was sexual orientation — or what was rumored to be Hagen’s sexual orientation.

One person at the meeting asked, “Is that really an issue?” But the decision had been made.

I realize it’s foolish of me to be surprised by anything the Bush administration does, but Hagen’s case is rather extraordinary. Respected lawyer, impeccable credentials Republican loyalist, outstanding performance evaluations — everything the Bush gang could hope for. But then the graduate of Pat Robertson’s college heard Hagen might be gay, and despite the requests of Hagen’s supervisors, Hagen was gone.

I know a few too many Dems are at each other’s throats right now over just awful (fill in the blank with Clinton or Obama) is when compared to (fill in the blank with Clinton or Obama), but stories like this one are a reminder of why we need a Democratic president in 2009. There’s just too much work that needs to be done, too many agencies that need to be repaired, and too many messes that need to be cleaned up. What happened to Hagen happened at the Justice Department, for crying out loud.

“To some people, that’s even worse than being a Democrat.”

And people wonder how such insane and seemingly senseless sectarian divisions like those between Shia and Sunni get started. This is how.

But under what category are we to file this: right wing social engineering or the usual Bushite purge of competence in government? Hard to tell.

  • Betch anything it was really about her work. Notice Goodling taking away part of her portfolio dealing with child abuse and exploitation.

    Hagen probably stepped on the toes of some big Republican’t donor child abuser.

  • I’ll bet if you got Goodling under oath and asked her if she thought gay people were inherently evil, she’d take the fifth.

  • And we, the people, are left with the remnants of the Regents University crowd to take care of legal issues which should be of and for the people. More like the bottom tier being against all the people.

    And these are people who are not easily fired so getting rid of them will be more difficult than some appointee. This leaves us with these low hanging fruit from schools such as Regents in the DoJ at varying levels for god only knows how long.

    Bush wants to ensure that government can’t function so that everything that government should do can’t be done because they have loyal gooper idiots running around doing what they do best; nothing for us and everything against us.

    As if I needed additional reasons to hate this administration.

    The only time I care who is fucking whom is when it is *I* who is getting boned up the ass from a government who doesn’t give two shits about me…and they do it without any friggin’ KY.

  • I’ll bet if you got Goodling under oath and asked her if she thought gay people were inherently evil, she’d take the fifth.

    I was thinking the same thing. What are the odds Goodling is a deeply closeted self-hating lesbian?

  • Man, I wish CB indexed the comments so you could search for things people said in those comments. There was a gal from Regents who came here long ago (when the whole Goodling thing was going on) and posted the trickle-down Jesus(tm) approach Regents takes in their entire teaching philosophy (the phrase coined by one of the then regulars) which is beyond greedy an totally rethugliscum. It was disgusting.

    Another of Bush’s legacies to us.

  • The only time I care who is fucking whom is when it is *I* who is getting boned up the ass from a government who doesn’t give two shits about me…and they do it without any friggin’ KY.

    MsJoanne! I’m shocked! Do you kiss you mother with a keyboard like that?

  • Goodling is marrying the guy who runs RedState. The two of them remind me of Pamela Sue Martin and James Belushi doing the White Man’s Rap.

    RedState pissant:

    I’m a white guy, I don’t take no crap
    When I deliver my white rap

    I got my money the old fashioned way
    My granddaddy dropped dead one day

    I’m rich, hot damn
    I never had to go to Vietnam

    Go a BMW and MBA
    Vote GOP on Election Day

    On Sundays for an extra thrill
    We fire up the Weber grill
    Invite some white guys and their wives
    We drink to within an inch of our lives
    Then it’s off to Ruth and Ed’s
    Where we wind up in each other’s beds
    I wake up, Ruth’s next to me
    I’m so glad I had a vasectomy

    But that’s all right, we won’t fight
    It’s just not done when your extremely white

    we’re extremely white- that’s right-
    we walk with our buttocks extremely tight

    Monica do wrong:

    Drop him off at the railway station
    Grip my teeth in sheer frustration

    Then it off to the tennis club
    For a tennis match and body rub

    We all go shopping. I buy a dress
    Put it on the white guy’s American Express

    “I’m liberated. I belong to NOW.
    But I voted for Reagan anyhow

    Vodka, Gin and Sweet Vermouth
    Lots of bran to keep our bowels loose

    I can’t wait to see the gooper hatemongering children these two will create. (SHUDDER)

  • This isn’t just limited to the Justice Department. Check out the questionnaires NASA employees had to fill out – and I’m not talking about applicants. Employees, some of them for decades – all had to fill out an incredibly invasive questionnaire, which not only allowed the government to interview their friends and neighbors about them, but also allowed questions to be asked about their spouses! Don’t want to fill it out? You can be replaced…

    It’s police state crap.

  • Ho, hum. You’re right, the Bush administration lurched along through so many jaw-dropping scandals (any of which would have ruined a Democrat) that it’s hard to believe the worst isn’t out yet.

    And still there are those who leap to their feet and cheer until they’re hoarse at every appearance of the Dear Leader. It takes all kinds to make a world, but that kind should really have their own.

  • Hagen received the highest possible ratings for her work as liaison between the Justice Department and the U.S. attorneys’ committee on Native American issues.

    It may or may not have anything to do with Abramoff, but the Justice Department seems to have some kind of obsession with Native Americans, too. It wouldn’t surprise me if the “lesbian” issue was simply a more acceptable excuse in this particular circle of thieves.

    Heffelfinger, Chiara, Bogden, Charton, Iglesias, McKay
    http://www.indianz.com/News/2007/002486.asp

  • This isn’t just limited to the Justice Department. Check out the questionnaires NASA employees had to fill out – and I’m not talking about applicants. Employees, some of them for decades – all had to fill out an incredibly invasive questionnaire, which not only allowed the government to interview their friends and neighbors about them, but also allowed questions to be asked about their spouses! Don’t want to fill it out? You can be replaced…

    It’s police state crap.

    It sounds like SOP if you’re getting a security clearance. I went through the same procedure back in 1991.

  • KTinOH, it’s not the same at all. My ex had top level military security classification and this is by far and away above SOP. And his clearance was, as said, the highest level. NOTHING like what is going on now.

  • I seem to recall that Goodling extorted an immunity agreement before she testified last year before the Senate Judiciary Committee and freely admitted that she “went over the line” in looking into political affiliations for civil service applicants.

    It raises the issue just how low a Democratic president is going to have to set the mower to clean out the partisans that have been recruited over the last 7 years, many to civil service jobs.

  • I processed military security clearances for awhile, as part of my job. Surprisingly enough, sexual orientation IS a factor, but only inasmuch as if it’s a secret, someone could use it against you to blackmail you. If you’re openly gay, big deal. And you’re never asked to put it in writing; security officials will question your character references and fellow employees. They also look for the expected things, such as large cash deposits you can’t satisfactorily explain.

    However, that’s the military, and usually that level of questioning is supplemental, like when you’re going to be assigned to foreign duty where you might be compromised, or if you’re taking a non-duty trip to a restricted country. It would have little application in a civil service position, unless they wanted to argue her integrity as a prosecutor could be compromised through blackmail. Unlikely, as most of her co-workers seemed to know.

  • No offense, but why would anyone want to work in that type of environment. It sucks for us, but let’s face it, government jobs are OK, and a Bush government job isn’t something most people would brag about. She is probably making double and working half the hours and her new bosses have degrees that don’t include Pat ‘the producer does coke’ Robertson on the diplomas.

    Did Monica dear know if she really was or do they toss you out to be safe ?

    She could not have been as smart as claimed, I mean seriously, a gay republican. If there is one group they have put on notice, it is gays. So my sympathy meter is set very low for this one. I will file this in the Albert Gonzales/Mary Cheney/Clarence Thomas token stooge file.

    I would love to know who Hagen is voting for in November.

    I know there is that law, and I know no one is being killed, but the analogies are striking. The pure culture non-sense and the gatekeepers of that culture are/were anything but. I will stop, but thank god a certain someone kicked out a certain unpure scientist who went on to convince a president to develop a weapon that ended a war.

    They are too stupid to realize that when they antagonize everyone that isn’t up to their high standards, they end up antagonizing a whole bunch of people and in a democracy, those chickens are getting ready to roost. Stories like this make me want to push anything even remotely offensive on these clowns. Let them know what it’s like when an opposing view point insists on pushing and grinding their views onto you.

    So R’s just keep doing what you do best, go after them all, show no mercy, and make sure no race, no sexual or political orientation is left behind.

  • KTinOH, it’s not the same at all. My ex had top level military security classification and this is by far and away above SOP. And his clearance was, as said, the highest level. NOTHING like what is going on now.

    I had to get a top secret clearance because I was working for an NSA contractor at the time. I was asked about personal finances, drug use, sexual orientation, the whole nine yards. I also had to provide five character references, and every one of them was interviewed. Finally, I had to complete a polygraph examination.

  • This gets down to what Hannah Arendt called “the banality of evil,” referring to the Nazis. Her point was that Nazis weren’t (all) drooling ax murderers — they were mostly bureaucratic functionaries selected for their strict adherence to Nazi beliefs, much like Ms. Goodling and the rest of the Bushies were chosen because they were lockstep right wing conservatives. The only thing these people do well is follow orders. And during the Third Reich, we all know where that led.

    You can lose your democracy one true-believer blonde at a time.

  • This should be all over the blogs. I was furious. I want impeachments. I want investigations. I want hearings.

    And mostly, I want Monica Goodling grilled until her make up melts and her blonde locks are pasted to her scalp with flop sweat.

    Can we get those memos and emails while we are at it?

  • KT, exactly. Why does your sexual orientation matter? What you consider SOP is invasive and not relevant to doing a job…and it was never a part of clearance.

  • My son took a summer job with NSA while in college. I have no idea what questions they asked *him*, but I got a waiver from them to copy my naturalization certificate (an illegal action otherwise). And we were plagued by calls from all kinds of people asking whether it was OK to answer questions about him. Including his piano teacher, who only had contact with him from 6 to 12. Both my husband and I thought it was hilarious as well as a waste of taxpayers’ money.

    But. That was NSA, for goodness sake; the ultra spooks. Not some lawyerly liaison for Indian affairs, where state secrets aren’t likely to be part of her job.

  • Everyone just assumes she was fired for being gay. Maybe she was fired for being competent, which is much rarer in Bush’s Justice Department than being gay or a Democrat.

  • Being gay and competent definitely relegates you to obliviion in this hopeless excuse for a government. My bumper sticker, “20 January 2009: the end of an error”, is all the more apt. There’s nothing more to say. The reality based community out here can’t possibly be surprised or outraged by anything this bunch of thugs does anymore. After eight years we get it.

  • Why would a smart, talented lesbian be a GOP loyalist anyway? Is she insane? Masochistic? Self-loathing? Why would anyone sane, let alone smart, be loyal to an organisation that seeks to marginalise, stigmatise and criminalise them? Mary Cheney’s Republicanism is (presumably) predicated upon strong family ties, but the motivations of Log Cabin Republicans, & openly gay Republican enablers like Andrew Sullivan & Steve Herbits, just utterly mystify me. It’s not like the GOP has made any secret of their antipathy towards gays & lesbians, or their willingness to pillory them electorally as objects of fear & loathing.

    If Leslie Hagen is a smart, talented lesbian lawyer I imagine she quickly found a much better workplace and hope she found a political party more deserving of her loyalty.

  • When the official in charge of personnel decisions at DOJ (Goodling) is a 30-year-old graduate of Pat Robertson’s Regent University School of Law, this kind of thing is to be expected. Of course, sexual orientation MAY have had nothing to do with it. In the Bush administration, being competent to do your job can be a firing offense all by itself!

  • Comments are closed.