It wasn’t a reporter

The idea that Karl Rove learned about Valerie Plame from a journalist — which became part of the conservative spin two weeks ago — has never really made any sense.

First, Rove has said repeatedly that he only didn’t leak Plame’s name; he didn’t even know her name. This new spin suggests he did know about Plame, but only because a reporter told him. Second, when asked which reporter allegedly gave him classified information, Rove said he couldn’t remember. How terribly persuasive.

Time magazine inched the ball forward over the weekend with a report delving into when, exactly, the White House learned about Plame.

As the investigation tightens into the leak of the identity of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame, sources tell Time some White House officials may have learned she was married to former ambassador Joseph Wilson weeks before his July 6, 2003, Op-Ed piece criticizing the Administration. That prospect increases the chances that White House official Karl Rove and others learned about Plame from within the Administration rather than from media contacts. Rove has told investigators he believes he learned of her directly or indirectly from reporters, according to his lawyer.

The previously undisclosed fact gathering began in the first week of June 2003 at the CIA, when its public-affairs office received an inquiry about Wilson’s trip to Africa from veteran Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus. That office then contacted Plame’s unit, which had sent Wilson to Niger, but stopped short of drafting an internal report. The same week, Under Secretary of State Marc Grossman asked for and received a memo on the Wilson trip from Carl Ford, head of the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research. Sources familiar with the memo, which disclosed Plame’s relationship to Wilson, say Secretary of State Colin Powell read it in mid-June. Deputy Secretary Richard Armitage may have received a copy then too.

When Pincus’ article ran on June 12, the circle of senior officials who knew about the identity of Wilson’s wife expanded. “After Pincus,” a former intelligence officer says, “there was general discussion with the National Security Council and the White House and State Department and others” about Wilson’s trip and its origins. A source familiar with the memo says neither Powell nor Armitage spoke to the White House about it until after July 6. John McLaughlin, then deputy head of the CIA, confirms that the White House asked about the Wilson trip, but can’t remember exactly when. One thing he’s sure of, says McLaughlin, who has been interviewed by prosecutors, is that “we looked into it and found the facts of it, and passed it on.”

According to Rove’s lawyer, Rove told the grand jury he learned of Plame though an unidentified reporter. This report in Time suggests that may not be the case.

Drip, drip, drip…

I’m not sure why the question of where Rove learned about Plame is really relevant, only that he “identified” her. How is saying “I’ve heard that too” or just confirming who she is any different than actively disclosing it. He still had the obligation to keep that information secret and if someone disclosed it to him (Identifying her as a CIA agent) then he still had an obligation to find out the answer for himself and not confirm it to the reporter. As far as Rove should have known, under his scenario, the reporter was not sure of her identity and status until Rove confirmed it for the reporter. From a legal standpoint, it may not make much difference whether he said “Valerie Plame is a CIA agent” or whether he simply confirmed the arguably unknown rumor of Joe Wilson’s wife being a CIA agent.

I think these symantic discussions about the actual words used are trying to muddy the waters of public opinion and put pressure on Fitzgerald. In the end, Rove identified Plame to the reporter as the statute calls for.

  • “Drip, drip, drip”–don’t you mean “clink, clink, clink,” CB?

    As in the sound of Rove’s handcuffs jangling when they frogmarch him out of his office …

  • Do the religous wrong also hope for Rove to go to prison?
    It seem’s to me if you are an evil person you just have to say your religous and quote the bible once in awhile and the religous people will forgive all sins or not even believe you committed any.

    Bush, Rove, Cheney, Rumsfield, and how about Mr Scrushy. He sure fooled those people in Alabama.

  • Comments are closed.