It went beyond just Armstrong Williams

Shortly after reports surfaced in January that Bush’s Department of Education paid conservative pundit Armstrong Williams $241,000 to promote the president’s education policies, the agency’s inspector general announced he would launch an investigation into this and other contracts with the media.

The report is finally available and, confirming critics’ fears, the department’s “payola” problems went far beyond Armstrong Williams.

Federal investigators probing the Education Department’s public relations contracts have found a pattern of deals in which advocacy organizations received grants totaling nearly $4.7 million to promote Bush administration education priorities in newspaper columns and brochures, but didn’t disclose that they received taxpayer funds, as required by law.

The department’s inspector general says he detected no “covert propaganda,” but he told administration officials to consider asking for some of their money back.

The report, released on the Education Department’s Web site Thursday night, said the department needs to do a better job monitoring how millions of dollars in grants are spent. More than $1.7 million, for example, went to outside public relations contracts that officials said resulted in no visible media products.

In other words, on top of the non-disclosure problem, in at least some instances, the Department of Education used our money for p.r. purposes for which there was no p.r. And in at least two instances, the department awarded grants to a pro-voucher group (the Hispanic Council for Reform and Education Options) that hadn’t even requested the money.

As for the propaganda angle, whether one agrees with Inspector General John Higgins’ report depends entirely on how one defines “covert propaganda.” The department contracted repeatedly with private media outlets to tout administration policy with a carefully-crafted political message without notifying the public that the government was paying for the message. I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that some people might consider that “covert propaganda.” Maybe it’s just me.

Regardless, Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), the senior Democrat on the House Education and the Workforce Committee, wants the administration to get a refund on the misspent funds. We’ll see how that effort goes.

Call me crazy, but I think the payola goes much, much deeper than that. How do you get a whole congress to go along with any initiative you want, and withold their oversight from anything you want to do?

Money, honey.

I’d be willing to bet that those billions in cash missing in Iraq are lining the pockets of our senators and representatives. Republicans and democrats alike. Probably most of the media too. How else can you explain the complete breakdown we are seeing here?

Let them prove by their actions that this isn’t true.

  • George W. Bush and Dick Cheney should personally repay the government for this expenditure. In addition, the head of the Governmental Agency that apporved the expenditure, should also kick in to repay the money. That will put a stop to this egregious propaganda campaign.

  • Comments are closed.