It’s all fun and games until a teacher starts burning crosses onto students’ arms

First Amendment law is pretty unambiguous about where the church-state line in drawn in public school classrooms, which is why it’s disappointing to hear about teachers who continue to impose their religious beliefs onto students.

But while there’s no shortage of incidents involving teachers promoting creationism, I don’t think I’ve ever heard of a controversy like this one out of Ohio.

A Mount Vernon teacher undermined science instruction in the public school district by discrediting evolution in his classroom and focusing on creationism and intelligent design, an investigation has found.

Eighth-graders who were taught by John Freshwater frequently had to be re-taught in high school what they were supposed to have learned in Freshwater’s class, according to outside investigators hired by the district.

For 11 years, other teachers in the school district and people in the community complained about Freshwater preaching his Christian beliefs in class and slamming scientific theories, a school administrator told investigators.

So far, so routine. A teacher rejected modern science, ignored the school’s curriculum and standards, and screwed over his students. Freshwater was told to stick to the lesson plan, but refused.

But when consultants were called in to investigate this teacher’s work, they also found that Freshwater “burned crosses onto students’ arms, using an electrostatic device.”

Seriously.

Freshwater told investigators the marks were X’s, not crosses. But all of the students interviewed in the investigation reported being branded with crosses. The investigation report includes a photo of one student’s arm with a long vertical line and a short horizontal line running through it.

It’s not altogether clear why Freshwater would be burning Xs into students’ arms anyway, but the Columbus Dispatch report includes a photo — and that’s a cross.

The family of one of the “branded” students filed a lawsuit last week against Freshwater and the district, saying the student’s civil rights were violated.

But here’s the clincher:

Neither Freshwater nor his attorney, Roger Weaver, could be reached for comment last night. Freshwater’s friend Dave Daubenmire defended him.

“With the exception of the cross-burning episode….. I believe John Freshwater is teaching the values of the parents in the Mount Vernon school district,” he said.

With the exception of the cross-burning episode“?

Look, if the report about Freshwater’s classroom antics is accurate, he generally sounds like just another fundamentalist with no business leading a science classroom. He ignored the curriculum on modern biology; he kept a Bible on his desk at all times; and he labeled homosexuality a sin. All of this is legally problematic, but guys like Freshwater are a dime a dozen.

But once a teacher starts getting into branding students in the classroom with crosses, it’s a little tougher to just dismiss his behavior as routine.

And aside from the cannibalism, Jeffrey Dahmer was a terrific neighbor.

  • Wouldn’t “burn(ing) crosses onto students’ arms, using an electrostatic device” be some level of assault? Seems like criminal charges are in order.

  • “With the exception of the cross-burning episode….. I believe John Freshwater is teaching the values of the parents in the Mount Vernon school district,” he said.

    What struck me was the second part of this statement. He was teaching the values of the parents in the Mount Vernon school district? What is that? What if the parents in the school district had decided that the earth was flat? Or the sun revolved around the earth? Or any number of unscientific things? What if they had decided instead that the government was corrupt and must be overthrown? Since when does a school district get to teach the values of the parents in the community?

  • Um, once a teacher starts branding his students with ANYTHING –a star, a moon, the logo of the nearest cattle ranch — it’s not only not “routine,” it’s criminal and sick and why this person is not locked up somewhere is insane.

  • what’s truly amazing – at least to me (a public school teacher) – is that it took the cross-brandings to raise any red flags on this guy!

  • i can’t believe no one has thrown out the most famous one yet:

    “other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?”

  • According to the story, complaints about Mr. Freshwater’s teaching have persisted for more than a decade. This tells me that perhaps he was teaching the “values” of the community, or rather those in charge of making the decisions in the community. Mr. Daubenmire – who has been the subject of his own church/state dust up for leading football teams he coached in prayer – thinks it is not possible to keep personal values (which he appears to conflate with one’s religious beliefs) out of teaching. I daresay that had a teacher told his students that homosexuality was not a sin but a preferred sexual orientation, he would have been out on his ass in the blink of an eye.

    A history teacher in the very small highschool that I attended was a born-again Christian who was constantly scanning the student population for converts. He once told my youngest brother that he was going to burn in hell. Not long after that, I ran into the superintendent of the school district and lodged a complaint about the teacher’s behavior and comments to my brother. I can still remember the look of fear in the guy’s eyes as he tried to dance away from having to do anything about unwelcomed Christian “advances” in his highschool. This sort of stuff is tolerated because it is easy to marginalize those who find it at best inappropriate and at worst offensive. For Mr. Freshwater to have been able to defy his bosses over matters of curriculum for so long is a good indicator of the “values” of his superiors.

  • “But when consultants were called in to investigate this teacher’s work, they also found that Freshwater “burned crosses onto students’ arms, using an electrostatic device.”

    Wait a minute… it took consultants to discover that student’s had been branded?

    No parents noticed? No students complained? No other teachers or coaches in the school noticed?

    Sounds like an episode of the Twilight Zone.

  • If all who SAID they were following the leadership of Jesus Christ truly WERE, we would be so much better off! I don’t recall Jesus branding anyone with anything other than His intense love for people and concern for anything that affected them.

    I am a Christian, although I hesitate to use that title when people who claim to follow the Bible and do weird things are also using the same one. Everything I read in Scripture indicates that our actions will show our faith, and burning anyone’s arm shows that the individual believes that physical signs in a person’s body are what indicate your faith, NOT the actions of love and obedience that Jesus taught.

    About the creationism versus Darwinism or evolution, or whatever name is the acceptable term at this time…

    I believe the accounts of the creation of the world as shared in the Biblical book of Genesis. However, I know that I cannot PROVE anything that is written in the Bible. I can only accept it, believe it, and live according to it. The reason I believe it is because the God Who put that account there for me to read is the same God Who sent His only Son into the world to live and try to mend the gap between the Creator and His creatures. I have seen too many answers to prayer that cannot be coincidences to not take the entire Bible on faith. I believe that if I doubt even one section of the Bible, I cannot know when to believe any of it. God is worthy of my trust, and faith in Him has made my life MUCH more bearable.

    I am not afraid to read about or even teach the THEORY of evolution or the Big Bang as just that…yet another idea about how the world came into being. I also find it interesting to compare many historical legends that try to explain creation according to various ethnic groups. It is fascinating to see how many of them are very similar to or even include the creation story from the Bible in some way.

    I imagine that God is sad to see His children attack one another with their version of the truth. I cannot understand why this teacher still has a job in that school system.

  • I am not afraid to read about or even teach the THEORY of evolution or the Big Bang as just that…yet another idea about how the world came into being.

    Careful there. Evolution isn’t just a theory, as the late, great S.J. Gould so eloquently stated:

    … It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world’s data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts do not go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein’s theory of gravitation replaced Newton’s, but apples did not suspend themselves in mid-air, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape-like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin’s proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered.

    Please, go ahead & believe whatever you like. But do so with the understanding that evolution has already been established as a scientific fact, though some of its details are still open to debate.

    Regarding the article, though, that’s definitely the Mt. Vernon I remember. Like a previous commentor, I’m baffled that nobody seemed concerned when kids came home from school with bright red crosses burned into their arms, but I’m encouraged to see there’s a history of complaints against this nut job stretching back 11 years. That, alone, suggests progress from what I remember about that town when I was an undergraduate nearby.

  • Lovely sentiments, Martha. We believe what we want and need to believe, of course, and yet science is based upon evidence and not faith, wishing, or fantasy. That is, evolutionary theory is not merely, like your beliefs, “yet another idea about how the world came into being.” Though, if it makes you comfortable to think so, you’re perfectly free to delude yourself.

    Moreover, the fact that another culture’s creation myths are “very similar to or even include the creation story from the Bible in some way” is not in any way evidence that suggests the biblical myth is a true account of the origin and development of life; on the contrary, it is the relatively recent (in historical terms) biblical myth that clearly expresses, and in some ways, plagiarizes, a number of much earlier creation myths from several different cultures notably older than the Jewish tribal culture from which the torah myth was produced. The flood story is one good example, but there are many others. There is much evidence to support this, if you care to investigate.

    This is to say, if you have faith, have faith, but don’t try to tell us, via circular reasoning, that there’s evidence to support your beliefs. Faith is, by the very definition of your belief-text, the “evidence of things unseen.”

  • Alas, I am on my iPod…could someone please explain what a scientific THEORY is? What its definition is. If I could copy and paste I would.

    As to this teacher what’s saddest is that the allowed him to continue to teach science (the only thing he was certified in…and i’d like to see that cert. test!) And allowing him to teach science robbed how many students out of not just an education but perhaps an interest in real science.

  • From Wikipedia:

    In science a theory is a testable model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise verified through empirical observation. For the scientist, “theory” is not in any way an antonym of “fact”. For example, it is a fact that an apple dropped on earth has been observed to fall towards the center of the planet, and the theories commonly used to describe and explain this behavior are Newton’s theory of universal gravitation (see also gravitation), and the general theory of relativity.

  • Why weren’t the police called? Didn’t either of these kids scream in pain during the burning? Where were their parents? The other teachers? The Admin? Why hasn’t the DA stepped in yet? What the hell is so wrong with every adult in that town that no one stepped in immediately after this occured and had the man arrested? And if he had complaints for 11 years about not sticking to curricula, then why wasn’t he moved to the math or history deprtments? There’s some systemic problem with the adults in that town that nothing was done beforehand to stop this man from teaching science. Whatever it is it’s prenicious.

  • What I don’t get is this: did every single student he did this to just stand still and let him do it? What, did he rope and tie them first?

    I realize that teachers have a certain amount of power over students, but did not one single student say “Hey, this guy has AN ELECTROSTATIC DEVICE and is about to BRAND us” and pull the fire alarm, or run out of the room, or something? It just seems to me that branding someone is not exactly something that can be easily done without the brandee’s permission. I think there’s some information missing from the newspaper story.

  • I’m with mellowjohn on this. Good lawd it took forever to get this cretin out of the classroom..think of how many minds he has warped and screwed-up..not to mention the time spent reteaching them correctly down the road.

  • “I believe John Freshwater is teaching the values of the parents in the Mount Vernon school district”

    The values of parents in any school district are reflected by the policies set by the local school board — and not by individual teachers.

    I recently volunteered as a reading coach at a local elementary school. I would pull a student out of class and we’d go to the library and read. It occurred to me that an unscrupulous individual could use this private, one-on-one time for religious indoctrination (or worse). No one at the school supervised the volunteers. The only way to get caught would be for the students to complain –and if you’re a good proselytizer, you give them nothing to complain about.

  • Martha ray you are basing your beliefs on a book that’s been edited more times than the sears catalog with more missing books than the freedom of information library which is supposed to be symbolic and not literally interpreted. Genesis and Evolution are in complete agreement if you make the effort to discover how that is possible then it becomes more than probable.

    Creationism is total bullshit which asks you to ignore your reasoning powers altogether.

    Facts are not insults but seem that way when trying to ignore them.

  • Where are you from, junebug? I am a Mansfield native and yeah, not at all surprised.

  • Burning crosses into a kid’s arm would just be the tip of the iceberg if these fundamentalists ever really gained power. Lapel pin hell, where’s your cross? Fornication everywhere and so few stones.

    God didn’t tell you to act that way but the interpretation of men. The one greatest commandment when thoroughly practiced prevents breaking any of the others for it is the nature of God and the best of man’s nature…Love…the principle by which all things should be measured.

  • gorp @ 25:

    I believe in flying magical bunnies. I will them to exist and so they do. So there.

    That is so close to St. Anselm’s “proof” of the existence of God, that I would have snarfed my drink if I’d been having one…

  • This country is so going to hell if we let christo-facists like this guy keep teaching.

  • Turns out there’s another followup today in what’s been a long series of articles on this…
    Board opts to fire teacher

    I won’t hijack Steve’s blog with a repost of the article, but it answers some of the questions readers have posted — while raising others. Sounds like this is one wacko community.

  • Martha Ray said, “The reason I believe [the Bible] is because the God Who put that account there for me to read is the same God Who sent His only Son into the world to live and try to mend the gap between the Creator and His creatures.”

    Um, sorry, no, Martha. God did not put that account there. Human beings (and I don’t mean Jesus, son of Joseph and Mary) wrote each and every book of the Bible. You might even notice that many of them carry the name of the person who wrote them (Hosea, Joel, Amos, etc., not to mention Matthew, Mark, Luke and John).

    And not only THAT, it was a people who, over the course of centuries after the death of Jesus, who decided what writings were and were not suitable to be included in the Bible. There is still disagreement and there are books recognized by one Christian sect and not others.

    You could look it up.

  • Oh, BTW, following the links shows that Mount Vernon FIRED this Firewater guy, or whatever his name is.

  • Martha,

    Try looking at the creation and Garden of Eden story as the Hebrew tribal creation myth, comparable to the tribal creation myths of many other peoples.

    Look at the Eden story as one that tries to explain the essence of life and humanity, through use of metaphor. The consequences of eating the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil stands out. Talk about metaphor.

    A good way to approach it is to ask the question: what happens if they do NOT eat from the tree? No sin? No death? No suffering? If you think about it, there is room for only so many people without death, so you get to a different sort of existence without challenge that is just not human. Without struggles and challenges, what would we be? I think we would be more like pets than humans.

    Tribal creation myths are metaphoric ways to explain the essence of life and tribal nature, and I categorize the Genesis version as just another one of those. Whatever you do, don’t look to the Bible for science, because the process by which humanity has gained its scientific knowledge to date has been a totally human process — it wasn’t handed to us, and it has gradually replaced the simplistic explanations found in the Bible, such as those that led the Catholic Church to have dogma that Earth was the center of everything, based on a passage or two.

    There are still plenty of wisdoms in the Bible, and they can help you in life, but you are going to have to apply your human reasoning to get use out of them rather than just playing sheep. That’s just who we are, and I don’t blame Adam or Eve.

  • I suspect the reason that the branding did not lead to protest from students was that it was voluntary — a way of badging that one was a committed, born-again Christian. A Fundamentalist teacher is less interested in persuading the heathen than in identifying and energizing future Christian leaders.

  • First of all homosexuality IS A SIN! Second of all, there is absolutly nothing wrong with teaching the next generation about the Bible. If we “evolved” from monkeys, than why do monkeys still exist? But I have to agree that branding students with crosses is crossing the line.

  • Comments are closed.