It’s apparently ‘a momentum situation’

It was just a couple of months ago that opponents of the president’s Iraq strategy felt like the winds had finally shifted. Dems were united in opposition, polls showed strong public support for the Dems’ withdrawal policy, a growing handful of Republicans had broken ranks, and several more GOP lawmakers had expressed strong reservations about the status quo. There was a sense that the White House couldn’t stand behind failure much longer and expect the country to go along; Congress was going to force his hand.

And yet, now, as the failure of the president’s policy becomes more pronounced, the White House “is growing more confident that it can beat back efforts by Congressional Democrats to shift course in Iraq.”

A senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity to avoid upstaging the president, said there was “a sense the dynamic has changed.” […]

At least one nonpartisan analyst, Charlie Cook, the editor of The Cook Political Report, an independent newsletter, says the pendulum appears to be swinging — even though the war remains hugely unpopular and Republican lawmakers are under great pressure at home to end it.

“It’s a momentum situation,” he said. “The momentum back in June and early July was really running hard against the war, and it was starting to snowball. But that snowballing stopped, and it has probably kind of reversed itself somewhat.”

I feel a bit like I’ve been watching a magic trick — I’m paying attention, watching the magician’s hands as closely as I can, and I still don’t know where the white rabbit came from. The reality-based community had the momentum, and now, apparently, the create-you-own-reality crowd does.

It seems to be one of those things that “everyone knows,” but no one knows why. Apparently, having Bill Kristol and Joe Lieberman boast of non-existent “progress” every day, all summer long, had something to do with it, though I’m not at all sure why anyone finds them credible.

But wait, say the Dems, the momentum can still shift back.

“We’ve got a series of hearings and reports due that will provide a much-needed dose of reality to the spin coming out of the White House,” [Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid] said. “Republicans may be breathing a sigh of relief, but the fact is, they’re headed with the president over a cliff.”

The other side doesn’t sound as if they’re worried.

Allies of the White House are encouraged, said Peter Wehner, a former policy analyst for Mr. Bush who works at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, a research organization.

“I think the situation now is that people are confident the strategy is going to go forward until the spring,” he said Wednesday in an interview.

I’m not optimistic. When the White House fabricates successes, administration officials say, “See? We’re making progress.” When those successes are debunked, they say, “See? We need more time.”

If you feel like we’ve seen all of this before, and know how it turns out, we’re on the same page.

“But wait, say the Dems, the momentum can still shift back.”

They sure can. By voting together to not fund one red cent further.

Or, as suggested previously by another commenter (-or?) here, pass some bill that includes a restoration of the pre-2000 tax rates on the wealthy to raise sufficient money to pay for the new war funding request AND pay for SCHIP funding and Gulf Coast restoration and a few other needed programs, especially troop equipment, health and recruitment programs and vet programs (knowing this would be vetoed by el presidente).

  • Unfortunately, Mencken is still right when he said “nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people.” I have, incredibly, heard this argument in public – not from politically aware people (I suspect the politically-aware, both sides counted, are likely 10 percent or less – much less! – of the overall population), but rather from “normal Americans,” you know – the kind where one in four hasn’t read a book in the past year, their reading level is somewhere around high school freshman (if that), they slept through “how a bill becomes a law” and are dumb enough to want to buy real estate in sub-prime conditions even now. These are the sheep Bush is aiming at, and they are unfortunately definitely out there.

    And the fact that the ACLU ad here is so right on in its definition of Reid and Pelosi and the rest of those who had a spine-ectomy with their election to office makes it likely that “the loyal opposition” will be more loyal than opposition. Sadly.

  • I feel a bit like I’ve been watching a magic trick — I’m paying attention, watching the magician’s hands as closely as I can, and I still don’t know where the white rabbit came from. The reality-based community had the momentum, and now, apparently, the create-you-own-reality crowd does.

    I know exactly where the white rabbit came from, and none of this is a mystery. The Congressional Democrats gave BushCo the rabbit, with a pretty bow tied on it for good measure.

    Yes, the reality-based community had momentum. Right up until (a) the Dems backed down on the veto fight over the supplemental and (b) the Dems totally caved on “War on Terror” spying. Who can blame BushCo for assuming they have the upper hand now?

    The war “progress” may be all smoke and mirrors, but the Repubs momentum is not. It is real, and Dems have no one to blame but themselves. As my old poli sci prof used to say, power is a function of capacity and willingness to use it. The Dems have capacity, but still lack power.

  • Hey CongDems, screw momentum. Do something.

    Like Bubba said, simply vote against everything that supports the war. Everything.

  • Wait, the Dems are going to have hearings? And reports???!!!???

    Oh yeah! Reports! That’ll turn things around.

    The Repubs meanwhile shift the terms of the debate with a few well-placed anonymous quotes to favored reporters and a few well-scripted Petraeus interviews with favored interviewers.

    How come American politics always seems like a football game, where the Republicans are playing tackle football in full pads and the Dems are playing two-hand touch in t-shirts and shorts?

    Reminds me of Tom Lehrer’s song, “Fight Fiercely Harvard”:
    “Albeit they possess the might
    Nonetheless we have the will!”

  • the reality-based community never had momentum; that was a chimera. stopping a war is incredibly difficult (the american public voted against vietnam in 1968 and waddya know, by 1975 the war was stopped) and there are too many chickenshit congresspeople for that to change.

  • I feel a bit like I’ve been watching a magic trick — I’m paying attention, watching the magician’s hands as closely as I can, and I still don’t know where the white rabbit came from.

    Apparently you forgot who we’re dealing with, CB. There’s no magic involved. The Dicktator calls the shots and King George makes them law. It’s Tyranny 101.

    The members of Congress are all the fit subjects of King George XLIII –and they will turn over the King’s Ransom for the Cheney Protectorate of Iraq/n or King George will simply issue an illegal and unconstitutional Executive Order (otherwise known as an edict) to seize the U.S. Treasury.

    The “momentum” has been with King George and his imperialist masters since day one of the Cheney Administration. The Democratic majority of Congress has done nothing to check the Plenipotentiary Executive.

    So here’s my tired refrain, IMPEACH ALL NOW, IN THE NAME OF GOD!

  • It was just a couple of months ago that opponents of the president’s Iraq strategy felt like the winds at finally shifted.

    Not all of us. Many of us knew that the spinelessness of the Democratic Congress would always serve as the firebreak protecting Bush’s war. The Bushies created their own reality, but they probably didn’t even have to.

  • I think Zeitgeist nailed it. On that note, I’m hoping you’ll do a post on today’s Washington Post article discussing Congressional Democrats’ continuing reluctance, despite their clear mandate from last fall’s elections, to challenge the administration’s foreign policy approach for fear of seeming “weak on terrorism.”

    “If you just say you’re standing up for civil liberties, the American people are with you, but if you say terrorism suspects should have civil liberties, it stretches Americans’ tolerance,” said Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin (D-Md.), who along with Hastings represents Congress on the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, a human rights monitor. “It’s a tough issue for us.”
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/29/AR2007082902355.html?hpid=topnews

  • Sigh – I’m starting to feel like we’re caught in the middle of competing ad campaigns, with one side selling Coke and the other Pepsi, when what we really need is well, neither. Or. maybe it’s a choice between a sharp stick in the eye and a punch in the gut – neither of those work for me, either.

    Forget all this baloney about “momentum;” momentum for what? The momentum certainly isn’t because there is visible progress in the engagement – that’s going so badly that someone in the GAO is leaking their report to make sure we know what it really says, before Bush gets a chance to re-write it. The military is so divided in their assessments that the various commanders are providing separate reports – they are not speaking in one voice and appear to want to make it clear that whatever happens, it is The Decider who is responsible.

    When you are winning and succeeding and making progress, you don’t need to sell – it’s self-evident.

    Why isn’t the Democratic leadership standing up and telling the American people that this is not an ad campaign, that it isn’t about market share – it’s about facing the truth that we can no longer continue on this path. That our military cannot support these troop levels, that the Iraqi government – such as it is – has shown so little interest in repairing the divisions in their own country that we can no longer justify the loss of life and the expenditure of billions of dollars, and it is time to make an orderly and responsible withdrawal.

    Why? I could do it, you could do it, millions of ordinary Americans could do it. Why can’t those we elected to speak for us do it?

  • Here’s a secret: “the surge” did not involve some number of American troops in Iraq. Nobody involved in crafting “the surge” gave a flying fuck how many troops went to Iraq (five thousand, twenty thousand, thirty thousand) or for how long (six months, twelve months, fifteen months). Nobody involved in crafting “the surge” gave a flying fuck what happened to the troops who did go to Iraq (except to the extent they could be described as being attacked by Iranians as a prelude to *another* neocon war of attrition against ourselves). Nobody involved in crafting “the surge” gave a flying fuck about what the troops would do in Iraq, because IT DOESN’T FUCKING MATTER TO THEM.

    “The surge” involved some number of Administration shills, lackeys, enablers, and their PR machine to assault the American media and Democratic politicians with innuendo, slander, lies, and concern-troll-style claims like “You wouldn’t not support the troops, would you?”

    The stars of “the surge” were not some number of American troops in Iraq; the stars of “the surge” were Bush, Cheney, Rove, Petraeus, Lieberman, Kagan, Kagan, Kristol, O’Hanlon, Pollack, and a thousand other minor conservatives, neoconservatives, and the bedwetting idiots who believed them when they said “the surge” was doing anything in Iraq.

    “The surge” isn’t doing shit in Iraq.

    It doesn’t have to. It doesn’t mean anything there.

    “The surge” is doing *plenty* in America.

    That’s what’s working. That’s where it has to work. That’s where it matters.

  • I think the Republicans (and Lieberman) are still operating inside bubbles. A Zogby poll recently showed how demented the Republicans are with regards to the Iraq situation. They truly believe the surge is working, and that it’s still winnable…

    A majority of Americans – 54% – believe the United States has not lost the war in Iraq, but there is dramatic disagreement on the question between Democrats and Republicans, a new UPI/Zogby Interactive poll shows. While two in three Democrats (66%) said the war effort has already failed, just 9% of Republicans say the same.

    […]

    Americans are divided on the success of the U.S. troop surge in Iraq – while 49% believe it is not working, nearly as many (45%) said the surge has been effective. The vast majority of Democrats (86%) don’t believe the surge is working, compared to just 11% of Republicans.

    http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1352

    Note how the propoganda they’ve been cranking out has worked to some extent.

    The Republicans are circling their wagons closer and closer, and from their view the surge is working. Luckily for us their bubbles have to survive the elections of 2008, where IMO they will suffer greatly.

    Reid is right about the cliff. By next year it will be obvious to most Americans that the doomed surge amazingly didn’t work, and no amount of spin will change that. Americans will have one last chance to punish Bush and his party…

    Bubble on, boys!

  • Well, if all you ever watched was Fox News, and all you read was The Weekly Standard, the WSJ and the Washington Times, you’d think the surge was working, too.

  • I don’t know about momentum, but I do remember a bit about dealing with playground bullies and in the Boy King, that’s what we have. The only effective way I knew to deal with the problem was to assemble sufficient forces to pummel him into oblivion, thereby sending the message that continued bullying is not in his best interest.

    Perhaps there are more politically and/or socially correct methods nowadays, but my guess is that anything more subtle than a good political pounding wouldn’t stop George. Each time he gets away with another outrage, he grows stronger in his own mind. This is the last thing you want in a man who’s convinced he’s guided by some divine force.

    Deal the man a defeat. Let the nation see him stomp and pout, scream and shout. But don’t enable him by being weak.

  • The momentum Cook refers to is purely a media construct. The media is jumping on the bandwagon of whichever political party appears to have the upper hand in determining policy. With the Dems caving on a number of issues despite their control of Congress, the media is back in Bush’s pocket. If the Dems come back from vacation with some unity and determination, the press will swing back to their side.

    There is no momentum about the war, despite Cook’s intention to suggest so. The fact that the GAO has to resort to leaking reports early to get the truth out about Iraq proves what’s happening there is a first magnitude disaster. It’s just that the press will present the perspective of the party that is perceived as having the most strength.

  • It’s our media. Like the stupid dog who never fails to chase the stick not thrown, they’ve allowed themselves to be played yet again. For the last few years the wingnut refrain has been ‘the media refuses to cover any of the good news coming from Iraq’. The surge produces positive results in one area, only to see significant deterioration in another – The same sick game of whack-a-mole that’s been going on since ‘mission accomplished’.
    The media then trumpets these small ‘positive results’ around the clock, in order to answer their wingnut critics. Add in some partisan hacks embedded in the media to twist statements from Dem presidential candidates into their ‘support’ for the surge, and you’ve got this narrative the the surge is working. It’s not that anyone believes idiots like Kristol, Lieberman or any other single source. It’s the greater vague impression that the media has created.

  • The “magic trick” seems pretty obvious to me. The fax goes out to all of official Washington on what the conventional wisdom is, and that’s the truth.

    I’m not sure the public takes conventional wisdom at face value any more. DC can’t wish this one away. The more the chattering class keeps their head in the sand in the hopes we’ll join them again, they more they undermine their own credibility.

  • The WH, the republicans, the military…They all control the press. Even when a truth talking Dem gets on one of these programs they are interviewed by ambush with the interviewers directing the discussions. Dems have a difficult time getting any message out compared to the republicans or the WH controlled military.

    Believe it or not the claim is there are vast numbers of Americans who do not want congress to cut the funding.
    I don’t know a soul who feels this way so why is that claim out there and why do people like Howard Dean, the DNC chairman, make that claim. How many congress members are believing it. This is the only way to stop this Bush occupation so why does the DNC chairman sabotage our efforts to get congress to stop funding this “splurge”. How can Dems in congress get the “message” out there when we are sending them a mixed message to get out there? I’ve mad my message clear to my representatives so who the hell is Howard Dean talking to? He wants out of Irag slowly but doesn’t want to cut the funding. I guess he expects the WH will just see the error of their ways.

    You can’t get momentum going without some clarity of thought and direction or else it’s pointless. Stop funding anything but troop withdrawal. Vote against anything Bush asks for because he is ALWAYS wrong.

  • Comments are closed.