It’s getting worse

Dennis Hastert may be impressed by some electricity in Baghdad at 4 am, but conditions in the city are growing increasingly horrifying.

In [tag]Baghdad[/tag], leaving home to work, shop or visit family has become an increasingly dangerous proposition. [tag]Violence[/tag] rears up without warning; residents navigate a citywide obstacle course of roadside [tag]bombs[/tag], shootouts and security [tag]checkpoints[/tag].

The city just had its deadliest month since U.S.-led forces invaded the country in 2003, new Iraqi government documents indicate. More people were shot, stabbed or otherwise violently killed in May than in any other month since the invasion, according to Health Ministry statistics. The figure does not include slain soldiers or civilians [tag]killed[/tag] in [tag]bombings[/tag], on whom autopsies are not usually performed.

Last month alone, 1,398 bodies were brought to Baghdad’s central morgue, the ministry said. All over the city and out into the provinces, corpses surface on a daily basis in garbage dumps, in abandoned cars or along roadsides. They often bear marks of bondage and torture.

The [tag]worst[/tag] [tag]month[/tag] in over three years. Whatever it is that’s on the march, it’s not freedom.

In related news, the Wall Street Journal had an interesting item today on American troops shooting fewer Iraqis at checkpoints and in convoys.

The U.S. military has cut the number of [tag]Iraqi[/tag] [tag]civilians[/tag] killed at U.S. checkpoints or shot by U.S. convoys to about one a week today from about seven a week in July, according to U.S. defense officials in Iraq.

The reduction in civilian casualties shows that months before the killing of 24 Iraqis in the western Iraqi town of Haditha came to light, the military was pushing to reduce the number of Iraqi civilians killed or wounded at the hands of U.S. forces.

The once-a-day shootings last July were the first month in which the military kept track of these incidents, suggesting, the WSJ noted, that at least “hundreds of Iraqi civilians were killed at U.S. checkpoints or on Iraqi highways during the first two years of the war.”

An average of one a week is clearly better than one a day. I guess if you’re desperate to find progress, this counts?

Update: But, war supporters argue, what about the WaPo item this morning that points to a new report showing that “Iraqis believe violence will abate”? There’s ample reason for skepticism. The report is the Defense Department’s quarterly report to Congress, which apparently includes the results of a “nationwide” poll gauging Iraqis’ attitudes about the future. Unfortunately, the Pentagon report offers “no explanation of who was polled and how.” I guess we’re supposed to take Donald Rumsfeld’s word for it?

Events in Iraq are spinning further out of the control of political event spinmasters in the White House. Talk about looking for the light at the end of the tunnel, Hastert is reduced to celebrating burning lightbulbs .

  • What fantastic news. You know I have made an effort to reduce the frequency with which I beat my dog. I used to kick him every day and not I have managed to only kick him once a week. I think the ASPCA is going to give me an award.

    As far as 45+ Iraqi civilians dying each day (1.8 per hour) goes all I can say is Freedom isn’t free! In fact at $6B per month spent on our occupation tha works out to about $4,291,845 per Iraqi civilian killed in May. The CIA world fact book indicates the population of Iraq is 26,783,383. At $6B per month we could give every man woman and child $225 per month. That is $2880 per year. The CIA says the per capita GDP is $3,400. Seems like this might be a better use for our money.

    The best part is that it will cost exactly ZERO American lives.

  • The U.S. military has cut the number of Iraqi civilians killed at U.S. checkpoints or shot by U.S. convoys to about one a week today from about seven a week in July, according to U.S. defense officials in Iraq.

    The reduction in civilian casualties shows that months before the killing of 24 Iraqis in the western Iraqi town of Haditha came to light, the military was pushing to reduce the number of Iraqi civilians killed or wounded at the hands of U.S. forces.

    There’s a real specious logic here – just because the average NOW is once a week (didn’t a pregnant woman her cousin both die last week at a checkpoint – so one must assume that none died the week before….) compared to 7 a week in July has nothing at all to do with an assertion that “months before … Haditha came to light that the military was pushing to reduce the number of Iraqi civilians killed or wounded at the hands of US forces”. The average only adresses “killed” – and just because the average is lower now says absolutely nothing about when it started to get lower compared to an arbitrary point. It might have still been 7 a week as recently as last month – we don’t know. Very shoddy water-carrying for the WSJ.

  • I posted this on another site’s thread.
    I think it is utterly relevant, but haven’t seen any top bloggers blog the idea.

    I suspect that’s because if you want to go main stream, you don’t start shouting that BushCo is guilty of war crimes:

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Latest Yahoo Headline: Gunmen seize at least 50 at Iraq bus stops

    The occupying force is RESPONSIBLE for the stability and saftey of the occupied country’s citizens:
    That’s international humanitarian law.

    Violations of which:
    The Conventions and their Protocols call for measures to be taken to prevent (or put an end to) what are known as “grave breaches”; those responsible for breaches must be punished.

    I suspect that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice will be tried someday in absentia….

  • I know Incommunicado is somewhere in Minnesota, and Wherethehellarewe is in Louisiana. Is Absentia on the Adriatic tourist coast of the Balkans? That’s far too posh for war criminals. (humor attempted)

  • Well, if nothing else, the story about the check point killings prove that metrics matter. Once you start to measure something, you invariably decide to fix it.

    Which goes a long way to explaining why the U.S. Military does not keep track of Iraqi civilian causualites over all.

  • One point I found unnerving about the WSJ article:

    “The numbers (of checkpoint deaths) don’t include civilians killed in raids resulting from bad intelligence or Iraqis killed in the crossfire of battles with insurgents.”

    Why not? Are those number just not as peachy as the checkpoint deaths?

  • Typical Dem politician response:

    “What do the polls tell me to say about this? I want to support the troops and the Iraqis, and the hippies and the hawks, so what the hell should I say!?!

    Response when Dems grow a pair:

    “Donald Rumsfeld has just announced that the floral arrangements on the Titanic are 53% more beautiful than ever, proving that the ship is not sinking. Well, Donald, I have news for you and your boss: you couldn’t be doing a worse job of managing the best military on Earth, and history will remember you as the imbeciles who learned nothing from Vietnam and couldn’t care less about our beloved troops. God bless every soldier who bravely gave everything he could give for liberty in this God-awful conflict, and bless their families for supporting America. I can only hope the light of truth will shine down on this corrupt Republican administration and inept Republican Congressional leadership before they have fully destroyed the values of liberty and justice that those young soldiers died to protect.”

  • I only have time for a quick comment but it’s something I’ve been saving up for a while.

    The worst month in over three years.

    I can’t help but notice that this gets used to describe Iraq EVERY SINGLE MONTH! You’re doing a heck of a job, Rummy.

  • Just curious: Does the pentagon count the pregnant woman killed as one or two deaths? Especially since she was (AIUI) shot on her way to the hospital to give birth…

  • Comments are closed.