It’s not just Bush’s fake-news segments reaching the airwaves

For the better part of five years, people concerned with the integrity of news casts, particularly at the local level, have had to worry about the [tag]Bush[/tag] administration’s habit of producing taxpayer-financed [tag]propaganda[/tag] in the form of fake-news [tag]segments[/tag]. As far as the administration is concerned, they’ve been doing it, they’ll keep doing it, and they’re not terribly concerned about independent analyses from the GAO over whether the practice is legal or not.

As it turns out, it’s not just the Bush gang. Corporations are producing fake-news segments — which amount to little more than mini-informercials masquerading as actual news — and TV stations are running them, too.

Many television news stations, including some from the nation’s largest markets, are continuing to broadcast reports as news without disclosing that the segments were produced by [tag]corporations[/tag] pitching new products, according to a report to be released today by a group that monitors the news media.

Television news directors have said that the segments, known as video news releases, are almost never broadcast, but the group assembled television videotape from 69 stations that it said had broadcast fake news segments in the past 10 months.

The new report was prepared by the Center for Media and Democracy, which is based in Wisconsin and which describes itself as dedicated to “exposing public relations spin and propaganda.” The report said none of the stations had disclosed that the segments were produced by publicists representing companies like General Motors, Capital One and Pfizer.

The stations are embarrassed now that they’ve been caught, but the Center for Media and Democracy found examples of stations’ reporters or anchors reading scripts supplied by corporations, and in some instances, adding the station’s logo to the propaganda to make the segments appear more like actual news.

I’ve been critical of the Bush administration for pulling this stunt at public expense, but reports like this shift the onus back onto the media. These local TV stations have to be held responsible for their willful deceptions.

I understand the larger dynamic — the stations are cutting back funds for real journalism to stay profitable, so these fake-news segments fill in the gaps. But if they still want their news broadcasts to be called “news,” they’re going to have to stop this nonsense.

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again:

Go rent “Network.”

  • I hear ya, CB, but it’s unlikely to change or stop. Even though TV news is rapidly becoming a joke, it is still most people’s only source for news, and it’s not like they are going to be blowing the whistle on themselves…

  • Local TV news Stations are no different than local newspapers. The smaller the market the smaller the news gathering budget. They both end up running unedited press releases and we end up paying for it. The bigger markets at least edit the damn things;.

  • As a writer who works in PR, I can assure you that this happens more often than any study can document.

    I’ve had at least four articles this year published as “news stories.” Granted, they were all dealing with financial education (which is a good think, I think) and didn’t mention our company by name, so I’m able to sleep at night.

    The fact remains, however, that they were presented as “news” but were not. And it happens all … the … time. And has for years.

  • Back when I was in graduate school (late ’60s) I taught an Honors Program course in which one of the assigned books was Jules Henry’s “Culture Against Man” (1963). It argued, way back then, that what had been purely philosophical topics (like ethics, epistemology, etc.) would in the future be transformed, by advertisers, into what he called “pecuniary good”, “pecuniary truth”, and so on. Everything, he argued, would be reduced solely to its profitability. Under “pecuniary truth”, that which makes the broadcaster rich is, thereby, true. Fifty years ago, Henry certainly was prescient.

  • I am also a writer and I also work in PR, and I totally agree that the blame for this is squarely on the media. Video news releases and written press releases are basic tools of the PR trade. We use them to alert the press to possible stories. If they are lazy or are constrained by profit motives and it causes the releases to be passed on as news, that is unfortunate, but not the fault of the issuer.

    The reason it is an outrage that the government does this that they are spending taxpayer money on it. The other issue of course is that every word in a release should be true. Again, the government falls down here.
    But in terms of introducing new products and news favorable to the companies, TV news does this anyway. They also essentially read the latest police and fire reports too, as entertainment.

    I want to throw things at the TV set when “local” broadcasts cover as news the latest reject from American Idol or the latest stupidity from Lindsey Lohan. It is insulting, but it is what passes for news these days. The whole sector needs a diaper change.

  • Ah, for the good old days when they filled air time with stories about puppies and pandas.

  • Comments are closed.