‘It’s the conservative Democrats who made real gains’? Not so

The Republican establishment deserves a great deal of credit for its ability to spin just about any disaster, but sometimes, facts are just hard to get around. Just as the GOP thought it was in the midst of building a “permanent majority,” Dems take back the House, the Senate, a majority of the nation’s governors, and most state legislatures. If you’re the Bush White House, where’s the silver lining?

Never fear, the right has come up with a new line that conservatives have embraced with two arms: the Dems who won yesterday are actually conservative Dems, which proves that the right is still the dominate ideology.

“Three dozen blue dogs have voted against [Pelosi] on various issues,” [White House Press Secretary Tony] Snow said, using a nickname for conservative Democrats. “And it’s the conservative Democrats who made real gains.”

The gains by conservative and moderate Democrats, which some analysts say will force the party to shift more toward center, is encouraging to Bush. The president believes they will support him in his fight for tax cuts, which Snow said the president has vowed not to give up.

Even at first blush, the argument is a bizarre tack for the right to take today. For the last several months, these guys have screamed at the top of their lungs that Dem candidates are radical, terrorist-loving liberals who’ll force Americans to marry illegal immigrants of the same gender. Today, after the elections, these same Dems are now “conservative.” How convenient.

But even if we move beyond the obvious flaw, a closer examination proves just how wrong the conservative push-back really is.

Ezra did a fine job debunking the entire line of reasoning, accurately labeling it “a myth.” It was simply a matter of looking at the Dems who won yesterday.

[E]very Democrat elected supports raising the minimum wage. They all support stem cell research. Only nine describe themselves as pro-life. And the most conservative Democrats, mainly those running in the South, largely went down to defeat. In Tennessee, Harold Ford, whose campaign focused on his church-going ways and conservative values, lost. Jim Webb is up by a few thousand votes.

Meanwhile, unabashed progressives like Sherrod Brown, Ben Cardin, Sheldon Whitehouse, and former socialist Bernie Sanders cruised to victory. As Tom Schaller has noted, the flip-rate in the South was a meager five percent. The real transformations came in the liberal Northeast, where a slew of not-quite-left-enough Republicans were felled by a phalanx of progressive candidates, and the Rust Belt, where economic populists took out a series of traditional conservatives.

Sorry, Republicans, you’ll have to do better than this to spin yesterday’s results.

And they all support on-going war, whether it be Iraq, Afganistan, or the ongoing genocide we actively support, indeed finance, in Palastine. Oceana, I guess.

I’m not impressed.

Out here at Homeless (and unemployed) on the High Desert, the view is that we’ve traded a handful of so-called conservative christian republicans for a handfull of conservative christrian so-called democrats.

What changed last night?

  • Carpetbagger: You focused on the conservative Harold Ford’s loss in Tennessee. Although I voted for him (how could I vote for Corker?), I wasn’t surprised that he lost. And it’s hard for this old progressive Democrat to see how Corker could be worse. I’ve allowed myself an “oh well”…

    Tennessee’s loss of Ford is actually a gain for America with the victory of Steve Cohen, who will fill the seat vacated by Ford. Check this out, from the blog of “Tennessee Guerilla Women”:

    http://guerillawomentn.blogspot.com/2006/11/tennessee-sends-ultra-liberal-to-us.html

    Yes, indeed, Memphis has elected an ultra-Liberal! My take is the powerful Ford clan, reportedly as corrupt as you will find in any banana-republic, was using its “political dynasty” to stay in power and, thus, preventing an infusion of progressive blood.

    Ford’s loss was not necessarily a loss for either Tennessee or for House democrats. Keep your eye on Cohen!

    Naomi (I live more than 200 miles from Memphis)

  • George F. Will is spinning in the WaPo this morning too. This wasn’t a repudiation of Conservatism but of the Republican’ts who have failed (truthfully) over the last decade to be Conservatives.

    Someone should try to point out to the man that it might in fact be impossible to be a governing conservative. That governance requires a different philosophy than “everything that government does is bad, or at least could be done better by the private sector.”

    Frankly, self-regulation is something I’ve never been comfortable about. It leads to things like poisoned food and bad doctors.

  • Even NPR is buying into the “Conservative Dems won yesterday” storyline. I heard as much during their interview with Sherrod Brown this morning.

    Unbelieveable.

  • Comments are closed.