It’s the voter suppression, stupid

Rick Hasen alerted me to this Houston Chronicle piece from the other day, about legislation in Texas that would — in the interest of preventing non-existent “voter fraud” — require that registered voters present photo IDs proving their citizenship before voting.

The measure is championed by Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst (R) and GOP lawmakers in Austin, who are using the same arguments heard in other states that have considered adding hurdles to participating in elections. Dewhurst has been relying on Mike Baselice, a prominent Republican pollster in Texas, who’s been helping bolster the party’s strategy.

Baselice conducted a poll the first week in April for an anonymous client on another subject. He says he threw the voter ID question in on his own, because it was a hot topic at the time. He provided the results to Republicans, who are now using it to support their cause.

The poll found 95 percent of Republicans, 91 percent of independents and 87 percent of Democrats support using photo IDs.

Royal Masset, the former political director of the Republican Party of Texas, who trained Baselice, says it is easy to elicit that kind of response to a poll question.

Among Republicans it is an “article of religious faith that voter fraud is causing us to lose elections,” Masset said. He doesn’t agree with that, but does believe that requiring photo IDs could cause enough of a dropoff in legitimate Democratic voting to add 3 percent to the Republican vote. (emphasis added)

And that, my friends, is what the “voter fraud” game is all about.

Wasn’t this same stunt just shut down in Geogia? Sorry, I don’t remember the details or have time to look it up.

  • This is a strange situation. Requiring id to vote, on the face of it, is not an unreasonable requirement. ID is required for everything from buying liquor to cashing a check. I think the question is, why is does it affect the voting so much. What is our failure as a society that makes it so difficult for poor people to prove who they are? perhaps a solution is to have registering to vote contain an id generating function. Weird.

  • I agree. On the face of it, I see no problem with needing photo id. In fact, it doesn’t make sense to me that I have to show my id for everything I do, EXCEPT for voting. So Dale, you are right, what is wrong with the system that causes a poor person drop off in voting. Once we figure that out, then throw the republicans a bone about this.

  • Republicans would never win if we had stupid voter suppression.

  • Dale and jambro (2&3)

    I have been wondering about that myself: what’s the big deal? We use IDs all the time, as you say… But I’ve never been that poor, so what do I know.

    A few possibilities:

    Some people might not have photo IDs because they don’t need them. If you’re really poor, you might not be driving a car or having enough money to establish a checking account.

    There are photo IDs and then there are photo IDs. To get a driver’s license (a photo ID), you don’t have to prove your citizenship, only your driving skills/understanding of the rules of the road.

    But, to vote, you have to be a citizen; to get a photo ID proving citizenship (like a passport), you have to go through many more hoops. You need to show your birth certificate. Do you have a copy on hand, or do you need to get it? If you need to get it, do you know whom to write (poverty pften goes hand-in-hand with lack of education)? Even if you know whom to write, can you afford the fee involved? What if you weren’t born in a hospital and your parents didn’t register your birth?

    The trick cycling gets even trickier if you’re a naturalised citizen (as I am). Theoretically, all you need is your certificate of naturalisation. Simple, no? But you’re specifically forbidden to photocopy it. And the people who issue your ID (passport, in my case; hopefully this would be sufficient, if VA were to adopt such laws) need something for the paper trail. So, I had to find someone who could legally swear an oath and put it on paper that he’d seen the certificate and that it was genuine. Had to make an appointment, had to pay him a fee…

    And that doesn’t allow for the possibility that you may no longer have your naturalisation certificate. I keep mine in the bank, with all my other important papers. But if you’re too poor to have a meaningful relationship with a bank, all it takes is a fire or a Katrina and poof goes your proof. I hate to even imagine what effort might be involved in getting a duplicate.

    If you’re poor, or elderly (or poor and elderly), if you’ve moved from your place of birth (so nobody knows you and can vouch for you)… scaling the bureaucratic barriers might be too much to attempt. And for what? For the priviledge/duty to vote? Chances are your hopes of improving your lot via vote aren’t all that great, since you’ve seen politicians come and go and pass you by without a look.

  • well of course.
    when republicans lose elections, it just has to be because of voter fraud.
    it couldn’t be because they’re a bunch of lying, cheating, corrupt, jesus-freak, mean-spirited grinches.
    could it?

  • btw, how does having a driver’s license prove you’re a registered voter? i though that was what voter registration cards were for.

  • Good points libra. Come to think of it, one person could spend all day voting and it not be statistically irrelevant. It’s the big numbers that Republicans are going for I think thus the 3 per cent. That’s why they want to make it more inconvenient for the disenfranchised.

  • My suspicion is that in the 2008 election, the 3% of the disenfranchised will have to be augmented with another 3 – 8% on Diebold “errors” for Republicans to win.

  • Come to think of it, one person could spend all day voting and it not be statistically irrelevant. — Dalle, @8

    Dale, in big cities, you could spend all day “voting” and still get to vote only once. What with the glitches (mechanical and human), the long waiting lines, the hassles about voter rolls…

    Even in our small town, if you came at a “wrong time” (just before work, lunchtime and right after work), you could, easily, spend an hour queuing just to get inside the building. And another hour queuing inside.

    It’s good to be a housewife, with lots of free time 🙂

  • Comments are closed.