John McCain, revisionist historian

Campaigning in New Hampshire today, John McCain, well aware of the Iraq war’s unpopularity, insisted that he’s been a critic of the administration’s approach for years.

McCain also notes, especially for anti-war voters, that he was an early critic of the war strategy waged by former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

“The strategy was going to fail with Rumsfeld. I fought against. I spoke against,” he said.

He’s been repeating this line quite a bit lately, holding himself out as one of the leading critics of the Bush war policy before Rumsfeld’s ouster a year ago. Indeed, two weeks ago, McCain told a GOP audience that it was he, and no one else, who was willing to step up and make the Republican case that the White House policy was failing.

Most political reporters are noting McCain’s talking points, but few are explaining how wrong they are.

In his stump speech, McCain argues that he “clearly pointed out [what] was a failed strategy.” This just isn’t true. In December 2003, McCain praised Bush’s strategy as “a mission accomplished.” In March 2004, he said, “I’m confident we’re on the right course.” In December 2005, he said, “Overall, I think a year from now, we will have made a fair amount of progress if we stay the course.”

And now he wants to position himself as a critic of Bush’s pre-2007 policy? For anyone who’s been paying attention, it’s a little late for that.

McCain, the war critic, huh? I must’ve been hearing things about who the first architect of the surge was.

  • “The strategy was going to fail with Rumsfeld. I fought against. I spoke against,” he said.

    Apparently McCaniac is also waging a war on pronouns.

    I wonder if Sen. Doughboy plans to reconcile his hostility to Iraq stratergery with a comment he made a few days ago:

    “I don’t know Mr. Kerik. I do know that I went to Baghdad shortly after the initial victory and met in Baghdad with (Ambassador Paul) Bremer and (Lt. Gen. Ricardo) Sanchez.

    So there was victory but you knew it was a failure … Wha?

  • WHA…? This guy has gone so far over the edge of the abyss, he has discovered that there is an abyss beyond the abyss. Has this man no sense of self-worth, that he has to debase himself in front of people who know what a two-faced fraud he has morphed into?

  • Steve, you gave me the idea for a horrific political ticket:

    McCain/Lieberman 2008 – Just because they kissed your arse doesn’t mean they like you.

    I really think that if McCaniac got in the WH he’d unfold his loooong list of grudges and start calling for heads.

    Hmmm…

  • Based on comments that wrere made on ABC this morning, in the roundtable discussion of Bernie Kerik and Rudy Giuliani, it sounds like the media isn’t planning on doing any kind of truth squadding until we know who the two nominees are – so unless McCain is the nominee, we aren’t likely to hear any questioning of what McCain says his positions were or are.

    The media does, however, seem to be having fun pitting the contenders against each other within their party – in hopes of engineering who will be the eventual nominee? Who knows?

    All I know is that I listen to these president-wannabes day after day after day just outright lying to the voters – about their record, about their opponents’ records, about the issues – it seems they haven’t found much they can’t and don’t lie about, all in the interest of “winning.” And what is the media doing? Hearing the same things, and doing virtually nothing – there’s no challenge, nothing.

    That it’s so familiar – from years of the media being too damn lazy to hold the current administration accountable for fear of being denied the inside track on the lies and deception – is not at all comforting.

    I guess it will be up to the web-based community of citizens – unpaid, and non-corporate – to do the job that so desperately needs to be done.

  • He is so full of it that his eyes are brown! Senator, we stopped believing you a long time ago…………….let me be the first, in case no one has told you before, you are NOT going to be living in the White House in this lifetime.

  • The Carpet Bagger seems a bit selective in quoting McCain…

    Funny how they chose to exclude this December 2004 Associated Press report:

    Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has come under attack from Republican Sen. John McCain and retired Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf over his handling of the Iraq war. In separate interviews, McCain, of Arizona, said he had “no confidence” in Rumsfeld …

    CarpetBagger…Would you care to revise your revision of John McCain’s criticism of the Bush/Rumsfeld strategy?

  • Oh and there is this AP story as well:

    GOP has serious national security fissure
    Associated Press
    September 15, 2006
    John McCain, R-AZ, Sen. Lindsay, Graham, R-SC and Sen. John Warner, R-VA, George W. Bush’ former Secretary of State Colin Powell, and Ronald Reagan’s Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff John Vessey all saying they disagree with President Bush …

    Steve, you definitely got a “Mention on other sites” at http://mccain08osm.com

  • I do remember McCainiac saying he disagreed with Bush on the way the war was run; he wanted at least 20-50thou more soldiers on the ground. That was when we all — foolishly, as it turned out — thought that Bush wasn’t going to plump for the escalation, because we didn’t have enough strength (either warm bodies or equipment). But then Bush called his bluff and stretched our military some more… I keep wondering when it’s gonna snap.

  • Criticism that came 21 months after the war began (March, 2003 – December, 2004) is not all that early, considering what was happening during that time. And when, a year later, in 2005, McCain says all we need to do is stay the course – one that still included Rumsfeld, and would until December of 2006 – well, it’s kind of hard to take that “early critic” thing too seriously.

    Considering how many people were calling for changes and criticizing Bush and the strategy, it didn’t take any courage at all for McCain to say, “Me, too” to cover all the bases. That’s what opportunists do – they say enough to always be able to show they took whatever position they think will get them where they want to be.

  • I remember all too well McCain saying he supported the surge, saying that victory was ours if we just stayed the course. Several times he mentioned disagreeing with Bush on particulars but only slightly, but for the most part he and Graham and Lieberman were strong supporters of Bush’s plans and of the war itself.
    Anytime he stated disagreement it was only to score points at a time when the unpopularity of the war and particularly of Bush was overwhelming. I remember being surprised at McCain saying anything negative about the war or Bush’s plans considering he said just the opposite a week beforehand and then would change his position a week after.

    Like Anne said…he is an opportunist and a phony willing to say anything to win. He doesn’t realize how senile he has become. Have you forgotten his Iraq visit with Graham?

  • Funny how the Democratic Candidates are no longer calling it the McCain surge because it is working and the little aparatiks of the party are saying he was against it. Folks…It is tough to parse the truth. McCain has always supported the truth. The Democrats support withdrawal and defeat.

  • McCain and most politicians could claim the moon is made of green cheese today, and deny it tomorrow and no one would remember. All memory is purged at midnight everyday. There’s something in the water. Or on TV, Or the internet.

  • This may well be the saddest story to come out of the 2008 race. A legit war hero who was thought so highly of that he was approached about running on a Democratic ticket. Now an aged politician who is attempting to sell his soul for votes. After being crucified by the Bush campaign in SC, he willingly served as Bush’s unofficial publicist for the next 4 years. Now he attempts to convince us he was critical from the outset of the disasterous policy that is Irag. Eight years ago I would have voted for him. Four years ago, I would have considered voting for him. Now, I feel sorry for him.

  • Comments are closed.