Just say, ‘Ney’

It seems inevitable that just about everyone in the Republican establishment who even shook hands with Jack Abramoff will soon regret it, if they don’t already, but there are a handful of members of Congress who may never recover from it. Tom DeLay’s connections are well established, but Michael Isikoff noted this week that Ohio Rep. Robert Ney (R) will probably be the next high-profile contestant in this scandalous game.

According to a cache of Abramoff’s e-mails released last year, the lobbyist planned [a trip to Scotland to play golf at St. Andrews] as a favor for Ohio Rep. Robert Ney, chairman of the House Administration Committee. In a June 2002 e-mail to one of his Indian-casino clients, Abramoff noted that “our friend [Ney]” had “asked if we could help (as in cover) a Scotland golf trip for him and some staff.” At the time, Ney had agreed to back legislation that would help Abramoff’s client, the Tigua tribe of Texas, to reopen a casino. It is against House ethics rules for members to take trips paid for by lobbyists. On a House disclosure form, Ney reported that the Scotland trip was sponsored by a conservative think tank, and that its “official” purpose included giving a “speech to Scottish Parliamentarians” and visiting the British Parliament during a London stopover.

But the Feds’ complaint against Safavian says it was Abramoff, not the think tank, that arranged the outing, which is referred to only as a “golf trip.” And other records reviewed by Newsweek raise further questions about Ney’s account. An “external liaison” registry of the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh shows that other members of the U.S. Congress visited that month. But there is no record of Ney’s doing so. In fact, the Parliament was in recess when Ney was in Scotland, so “there is no way” he could have addressed the body, said Sally Coyne, a Parliament spokeswoman. A press officer for the House of Commons in London said the British Parliament was also in recess.

This looks pretty bad for ol’ Bob. His office told Newsweek that Ney spoke to Scottish Parliamentarians and visited the British Parliament, but not in a “formal” way. When asked who, specifically, Ney talked to, a spokesman said the lawmaker “met with a number of folks over there. I don’t have any names.”

Needless to say, this isn’t Ney’s first ethics problem. In May, NBC News found that in 2003, Ney helped a three-time convicted felon connect with a Syrian businessman about selling airplanes in the Middle East. At the same meeting, Ney won $34,000 on an initial bet of $100, which he then used to pay off his credit card debt.

But it’s the Abramoff connection that could be Ney’s undoing. He’s due to “review the matter” with the House ethics committee this year.

If Ney is lucky, that’ll be as far as it goes. If David Safavian’s experience is any indication, Ney better hope some FBI agents don’t appear at his door.

I hope it is just my paranoia about the Republican “intention” to build the fascist state, but what if all these scandals are not the leading edge of the political storm, which sweeps the right-wing from power — what if the rule of law is under assault here?

Democrats have spent years and years wishing reporters in the media would grow backbone and do their jobs, but the corporate right-wing media became the corporate right-wing media some time ago, and it ain’t gonna happen. Reporters are hired for their incompetence.

Now, we are waiting for the FBI and the U.S. attorney to show up. Congress, itself, is unlikely to investigate any time soon, for obvious reasons. But, why are we so confident in the judicial process? Have you looked at who is Attorney General? And, isn’t former Abramoff associate, Timothy Flanigan, actually awaiting confirmation as deputy Attorney General!

What if we are watching a political storm gathering? What if we are watching the final assault on the rule of law, by the builders of the fascist state?

  • What if we are watching the final assault on the rule of law, by the builders of the fascist state?

    I’ve been worried about this too.

    I predicted on Steve Clemons site that Bush would just go ahead and shove Bolton’s appointment through on a recess appointment before he’d give up the documents the Senate committee was entitled to. (The White House don’t take no steeenking orders from the Senate, you hear?) And lo and behold, that’s exactly what happened.

    Then, apparently to prove his point, the Senate rolled over on the Roberts nomination without getting the documentation they’d asked for from the White House.

    I’m betting that Bush pardons Rove and everyone else involved in the Plame case, once the shit hits the fan on that one.

    And what will anyone do about it, exactly?

    Nothing.

    Drip
    Drip
    Drip, as they say

    Laws and the Constitution mean nothing to these people.

  • Post #1 today: A gov’t bureaucracy filled with party hacks whose total allegience is to the party and corporate sponsors.

    Post #2: A party apparatus threatened with the loss of what is basically total control of our gov’t before many party goals have been accomplished.

    Post #3: A blatant desire to override logic and proven science with fantasy beliefs that are meaningless but should be taught and backed by the force of “law”.

    Post#4: “What if we are watching the final assault on the rule of law, by the builders of the fascist state?” Thank you Mr. Wilder

    Apologies for distilling your excellent posts down with my Swiss Army knife like that Mr. CB but the overall prognosis is bad. There’s a definite craving for world controlling power, (religious?, corporate?, military?, all of the above?), rumbling in the belly of the White House. And an ineffectual leader plus a truly incompetent bureaucracy are forcing a reach for the baseball bat because the shiv just hasn’t spilled enough blood to kill the beast. Anger, impatience and desperation are becoming the orders of the day. It’s all revving up to provide us with very interesting times.

    From the Harpers Index in my Sunday paper yesterday:

    Total annual spending controlled by functionally illiterate U.S. consumers: $414 Billion

    Lip smacking good for folks who believe that $414 Billion is just too much responsibility to manage for people that can hardly read or write.

  • Comments are closed.