Katrina recovery efforts — and Republicans’ disinterest

Barack Obama did a good job yesterday of bringing attention to an issue that seems to have been largely forgotten: post-Katrina recovery in New Orleans. If only Republicans had bothered to listen to what Obama had to say.

Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama blasted the Bush administration Monday for the slow pace of Hurricane Katrina recovery efforts, saying reconstruction no longer seems to be a White House priority.

“There is not a sense of urgency in this administration to get this done,” said the senator from Illinois. “You get a sense that will has been lacking in the last several months.”

This wasn’t posturing. Obama was in New Orleans for a field hearing of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, which saw the inadequacies of the federal response first-hand.

Here’s the kicker from the Chicago Tribune article: “The hearing is one of the first that the Homeland Security Committee has scheduled since the Senate passed to Democratic control. No Republican members attended.” (emphasis added)

None? After Bush swore to do whatever it took to rebuild the Gulf Coast, not a single Republican senator on the committee would even show up for a field hearing on reconstruction?

On the other hand, it’s possible every GOP member of the committee decided not to bother with the field hearing because they know Joe Lieberman chairs the committee — and he’s about as interested in administrative oversight as Republicans were when they were the majority.

As the hearing began, a protester stood and unfurled a banner urging “Probe the White House,” a reference to calls for establishment of a commission to investigate the administration’s response to Katrina modeled after the Sept. 11 commission.

Speaking later to reporters, committee Chairman Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut said he would rather focus on the rebuilding effort and was reluctant to mount a new investigation of the failures in the initial response.

“We don’t want to play ‘gotcha’ anymore,” Lieberman said.

When did we play “gotcha”? I missed a good game of “gotcha” and nobody told me?

Please. The chairman of the committee sets the tone and agenda for the committee’s efforts. Last year, when Lieberman was running for another term, he decried the Bush administration’s unwillingness to answer key questions, and pledged to investigate the White House’s response to the disaster. Then, after the elections and after he became committee chairman, he said the opposite.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, the only Democrat to endorse President Bush’s new plan for Iraq, has quietly backed away from his pre-election demands that the White House turn over potentially embarrassing documents relating to its handling of the Hurricane Katrina disaster in New Orleans.

The president blew off Katrina recovery in the State of the Union; Republicans blew off the field hearing on reconstruction progress; and the chairman of the committee responsible for overseeing all of this has effectively admitted he doesn’t want to hold the administration responsible anymore.

Obama said yesterday that we may be “in danger of actually forgetting New Orleans.” Apparently, some already have.

You know, I hate to say this, but the only people I know who have anything to say about Katrina are those of us who personally know people whose lives were wrecked. The rest of the country goes around not thinking about it, or – if they do – thinking those people “deserved it” for living there.

  • it’s like joe lieberman wakes up every morning and asks himself “what can i say today that will most piss off rational people” and then says it.

    as for katrina, i have to agree with tom: by and large, most people who don’t have a personal connection have on clue that new orleans is never going to be the same.

  • C’mon … we all know that a bunch of brown people living in what amounts to a reverse island deserve what they got and should just get over it. They should just have FEMA move their trailer to, say, Oklahoma. That way, when it gets hit by a tornado, they can be sure that the government will pay attention.

    /sarcasm

    Could someone tell Holy Joe that “accountability” is different from “gotcha.”

    For example, the latter whould be his participation in the Clinton witch hunt, while the former would be finding out why the federal government ignored an entire city as it drowned.

  • The Times Picayune story had this gem on Bush:

    Powell: “I didn’t feel slighted (by the State of the Union), because I know his heart, and I know what his commitment is.”

    http://www.nola.com

  • On a wider note, I saw just a headline that 100’s of levees are in danger of being breached. Bush has parked a car up on blocks in the front yard of America with his political slovenliness.

  • “We don’t want to play ‘gotcha’ anymore,” Lieberman said.

    What an ass. It’s Congress’ role to be a policeman on the government beat. What would law and order types like Joe say if regular cops told the media they don’t want to pursue criminal activities because “We don’t want to play ‘gotcha’ anymore.”

    No, Joe wants to to play other games instead with the residents of the Gulf Coast. He would rather play that peculiarly Republican game that Dick Cheney so aptly named, “go f*#k yourself.”

  • Tom @1 –

    Hear, hear. People just have no idea the scope of the devastation to so many lives.

    My mom, brother and sister all lost their homes from Katrina – and of course everything that they own, every single picture, all their friends have scattered trying to pick up the pieces of their lives. Imagine what it’s like to throw a couple of changes of clothes into a car, head out of town to wait for the hurricane to pass (as New Orleans’ residents did several times a year for decades) and then BAM every single thing that you own is just gone.

    Even now, my mom will mention that she lost everything in Katrina and people just get this blank look and go “oh” as if you mentioned that you had a salad for lunch.

    Bush is just a prick – after his mom’s comments and his known history of shoving firecrackers up the arses of frogs and getting off on the Abu Ghraib photos, what the hell does he care about a little bit of suffering by people other than him? It’s good for the soul, right?

    And Lieberman? I don’t even know where to begin with that douchebag. I actually feel dirty having voted for him in 2000. Is there any opportunity for political retribution against this scumbag?

  • Democratic Residents of Connecticut who voted for Joe should be ashamed………….

    Joe can play gotcha with his own party….but appartently not with an adminstration that has forgotten its responsibilty to the people of this country….

    Way to go Joe…..

    The Iraq issue is one thing if he wants to disagree fine…so be it…but on big DEM issues like governement oversight and responsibilty for its citizens Joe’s lack of interest in this topic should be the final straw for the DEM leadership…..let him keep his chairmanship for majority sake but dont trust him ever again to support the principles of the DEM party…..

  • W talked about New Orleans in the Juan Williams interview yesterday. It was pathetic. The tone of it was that the feds had already sent lots of money, so what more do people expect? I’ll have to look for the transcript, but he pretty much said it’s a state and local matter now. He basically is done with it, once the check got signed.

    I guess there are no terrists there, and no chance for glorious ‘victory’. Maybe someone should tell him he’s also “Commander-in-Chief” of the Army Corps of Engineers.

  • I APOLOGIZE FOR QUOTING THE WHO BUT I CAN’T SAY IT ANY BETTER.

    I’ll tip my hat to the new constitution
    Take a bow for the new revolution
    Smile and grin at the change all around
    Pick up my guitar and play
    Just like yesterday
    Then I’ll get on my knees and pray
    We don’t get fooled again
    Don’t get fooled again
    No, no!

    Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!

    Meet the new boss
    Same as the old boss

  • A number of people tried to excuse the people of Connecticut for backing Lieberman because they said that except for Iraq he was pretty much a liberal on everything else.

    Horse pucky. The fact that they don’t move to recall him now just deepens their shame. Idiots!

  • Dale – I read that in 1/29 USA Today and in light of Lieberman’s not wanting to play ‘gotcha’ he ought to know that some of those levees are in Connecticut.

    In November, the Corps told Connecticut state and local officials that four of the state’s 11 federally built levee systems – in Hartford, East Hartford, Torrington and Waterbury – could be decertified by the end of 2006 if problems were not fixed.
    http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jan2007/2007-01-29-09.asp

  • As the hearing began, a protester stood and unfurled a banner urging “Probe the White House,”

    This caught my eye because it was not followed by “The protestor was promptly dragged from the room by burly security specialists.”

    It is no surprise that the WH wants to forget Katrina. Not only did it make them look like the slack arseholes they are, but unlike September 11th (something they mention at every possible opportunity) they can’t get anything out of it besides a few juicy contracts for Haliburden. If you could show that Iran caused the hurricane they might take an interest, otherwise…snore!

    tAiO

    Regarding personal impact, a cousin lost his home and then when he finally got a trailer (a few months ago) it blew up as he was walking in to check it out. He died a week later. I’ve heard a few stories about exploding trailers but hey, who cares what happens to a bunch of people too poor to afford to buy a new house? Still doing a heckuva fucking job FEMA!

  • I’m not sticking up for Republicans, but courtesy of the way that the GOP abused “field hearings” to “discuss” climate change, I’m not sure why any legislator would think that these particular hearings will be any different.

  • I’ll be succinct. I hope Obama will bring New Orleans back as an issue for the ’08 elections. And if not he, I still haven’t given up hope Al Gore will enter the race.

  • I hate to say it, but we will see if Louisianians actually give two shites about themselves in the next governor’s election, and in the 2008 presidential election. New Orleanians already reelected one chump, Ray Nagin, and that is having very negative consequences. Odds are, though that they will vote in a GOP governor, Bobby Jindal, a Bush enabler and excuse maker, and the state will likely vote GOP in the 2008 presidential election.

  • Well, I guess you can look at it this way CB. You know you’ve made it when the wingnuts send over a lackey to disrupt the place.

    Congrats CB, keep up the good work!

  • I guess people like Turd World are the wingnut version of ‘Whack A Mole’. They keep popping up and CB keeps hammering them back down.

    Good job, CB! 🙂

  • NOLA & the Fed appear to be frozen over who is going to get to make the bucks out of the flood area. As soon as the corpse is carved up and apportioned and they have agreement you will see the Corps of Engineers start a new state-of-the-art levee system. Maybe by ’08.

    The City (and State) has to take all the low land by imminent domain and either fill it to above the flood plain or build platforms on pilings ($3,500 to $6,000 for a modest house) for houses before re-building. Simple. Avoiding high end gentrification is the big problem.

  • I’ve read elsewhere that a lot of Louisiana state money is yet unspent because the entitled beneficiaries cannot decide whether to rebuild on their land or to relocate. The state’s offer to rebuild includes the cost of constructing the house on stilts.

  • Thanks for blogging about New Orleans. Unfortunately, people know very little about what’s going on here, and often what they do know is wrong.

    Take for instance comment 26. IF you had flood insurance, there’s a benefit worth $30 thousand dollars to raise your house above the official FEMA flood elevation. Now, setting aside the fact that a lot of houses that are already above the official FEMA flood elevation flooded, you really can’t raise a house for that amount of money unless your house is already on piers and it’s a small house. For folks with slab houses, raising is more like a $50 thousand dollar effort. Or, you can just demolish and start all over, and you can use part of that $30 thousand to do the demolition (mine cost $7 thousand). And if you didn’t have flood insurance, perhaps because you were above the official FEMA flood elevation and you trusted the floodwalls to not fall over before the water even reached the top, then you’re on your own.
    And did I mention that the Corps of Engineers is going to release a report that is supposed to clearly illustrate what the risks are throughout the area so that the poor souls who really want to remain here can build wisely? That report is supposed to be released in March 07. So some folks are waiting for that, too.
    No wonder the city isn’t rebuilt yet!

    Peace from a blogger in New Orleans,

    Tim

  • What would be even more beneficial to the people of our city would be an independent investigation of the levee failures. Without the levee failures, there would be no need for a response in the first place.

    We suffered a man-made disaster due to faulty Federal flood protection. 3 investigative study teams have said that the Army Corps of Engineers is not properly addressing its flaws. To make it worse, the Corps is using a subjective investigation of itself as the basis for all future flood protection projects.

    We need an independent investigation to find out what went wrong and how to get it right. Only then, can New Orleans’ future be secured.

    For more information or to sign our petition calling for this investigation, go onto http://www.levees.org.

    Vince Pasquantonio
    Legislative Director
    Levees.Org

  • Comments are closed.