The new public relations offensive in support of Bush’s Iraq Escalation 5.0 policy has included a disturbing amount of attacks on dissent. Dick Cheney got the ball rolling last week, telling Fox News that Congress would be “undercutting the troops” if lawmakers criticize Bush’s policy. Tony Snow went even further, suggesting criticism may lend comfort to the enemy. On Meet the Press yesterday, John McCain (R-Ariz.) said even a non-binding resolution would represent a failure to support the troops.
The shameless demagoguery has led me to often wonder what, exactly, the president and his supporters would like us to do. If Americans, whether they be in Congress or among the electorate at large, disapprove of the reckless and irresponsible White House policies, how should we articulate our dissatisfaction? What kind of dissent would meet with conservatives’ approval?
Yesterday, William Kristol explained it to us.
This morning on Fox News, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol said that opponents of escalation in Congress are “leap-frogging each other in the degrees of irresponsibility they’re willing to advocate.” Kristol said, “It’s just unbelievable…. It’s so irresponsible that they can’t be quiet for six or nine months,” adding, “You really wonder, do they want it to work or not? I really wonder that.”
NPR’s Juan Williams told Kristol his analysis was “totally ahistorical,” and pointed out that yesterday was the deadliest day for U.S forces in Iraq in two years. “There’s something going on here you might pay attention to as opposed to just the politics of, ‘If you don’t support this president, you don’t really want us to win.'”
What kind of dissent is appropriate? The kind in which we say literally nothing until around October.
To his credit, Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) to CBS’s Bob Schieffer yesterday that it “is complete nonsense to say we’re undercutting the support of the troops.”
Hagel, a Vietnam veteran, said that as a soldier in 1968, he “would have welcomed the Congress of the United States to pay a little attention as to what was going on.” Hagel added: “What are we about? We’re Article 1 of the Constitution. We are co-equal branch of government. Are we not to participate? Are we not to say anything? Are we not to register our sense of where we’re going in this country on foreign policy?”
You see, Sen. Hagel, that’s pre-9/11 thinking.
Oddly enough, Hagel and Kristol were on competing morning shows, but Kristol ended up indirectly answering Hagel’s questions. “Are we not to say anything?” Hagel asked. “Be quiet for six or nine months,” Kristol responded.