Let’s be Blunt

All indications were the Rep. David Dreier (R-Calif.) had been tapped to serve as the (temporary) House Majority Leader now that Tom DeLay is under indictment. Now it appears the earlier reports may have been premature.

In a surprising twist in the ongoing GOP power struggle, CNN is reporting that House Speaker Dennis Hastert will ask Dreier and House Majority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) “split DeLay’s duties without getting his official title.”

If accurate, I believe it suggests Blunt’s time in the leadership may be “permanent,” not “temporary.” Blunt is an ambitious conservative with a powerful (and borderline corrupt) operation of his own. If he gets the power over the caucus, he’s not going to give it up.

In fact, as it turns out, we’re probably seeing the transition of power from the most corrupt House Republican to the second most corrupt House Republican.

In one of the more startling examples of influence peddling in recent memory, the Washington Post reported in 2003 that Blunt secretly inserted a special provision favorable to Philip Morris into a House bill dealing with domestic security.

In this particular controversy, Congress was preparing to vote on a massive, 475-page bill on the Department of Homeland Security. Literally just a few hours before the final House vote, Blunt inserted a provision into the legislation that to make it harder to sell tobacco products over the Internet and would have cracked down on the sale of contraband cigarettes — two measures Philip Morris has wanted Congress to pass for some time because they strongly affect the company’s profits. The provision had never faced a House vote and had never been approved by the speaker or majority leader, but Blunt did it anyway.

In fact, when you think of a congressman with close ties to a tobacco corporation, Blunt is almost a caricature. Blunt’s son is a lobbyist for Philip Morris in Missouri, Blunt dated then married a Philip Morris lobbyist in DC, and Philip Morris has contributed over $150,000 to Blunt’s political action committees in just the last two years.

It’s not just tobacco. Blunt also controls his own K Street operation, with an efficient system of delivering legislation, contingent on campaign contributions, based on corporate lobbyists’ demands.

Congressional Republicans will no doubt offer words of support publicly, but once Blunt has made himself comfortable in the Majority Leader’s office, the only way to get him out is to elect a Dem majority. DeLay must know this — when Blunt’s Philip Morris scandal broke, many House Republicans believed DeLay planted the story in order to slow Blunt’s assent up the leadership ladder.

I don’t know if DeLay is going to be convicted or not, but I really don’t think he’ll ever get his old job back.

Obviously there will be a (brief?) battle between Blunt and Dreier for total control. I see it as the religious right’s guy (Blunt, a baptist) against the corporate repugs’ guy (Dreier, a real estate developer from San Dimas).

I’m given even odds on Blunt and 3to1 on Dreier.

  • The NEOCONS are obviously bent on destroying the nation! What else are we to think with assholes like this in control?

  • if these two monsters do share power, could we refer to their joint position as “the beast with two backs”?

  • And his other son, Matt Blunt, is currently governor of Missouri. I don’t know if there has ever been a governor whose approval rating has dropped as fast as his. In his first term his approval has already skidded to under 40% and he is the fourth least popular governor in the country. After swearing in his campaign that he wouldn’t gut Medicaid that’s exactly what he and the Republican legislature did. Not only will over 90,000 people lose coverage before the end of the year but the law they passed will also completely eliminate Medicaid by 2008. Imagine this one. The state agrees to pay for a powered wheelchair for someone who can’t walk and is poverty stricken. Then they refuse to pay for the batteries. The system is now full of such stupidity. The same law created a commission whose job it is to design a replacement by 2006. But…there is nothing in the law that says that the replacement program has to be enacted. There is nothing that says that Medicaid will stay in place until the replacement is enacted. Why can I easily see Republicans wrangling among themselves as to how little they can get away with doing until Medicaid goes away in 2008 without anything to take its place?

  • At least Dreier is good on TV. I can see why they’d want to clear out some of Delay’s stink by making him the front man. Blunt, on the other hand, is a repellant, sluglike Taliban pusbag of corruption just like Delay.

    Would be fun to hear the details on how Dreier got “unpicked” for the job. Dobson picked up the phone?

  • Poor Tom. If only he were a democrat. Then he wouldn’t have to worry about stepping down from a leadership position, as the Pepublican Party requires in the event of an indictment. Democrats, on the other hand, have no such rule. Tom could stay in and make a dozen Clintonesque caveats on the definition of the word “is.”

  • “I don’t know if DeLay is going to be convicted or not, but I really don’t think he’ll ever get his old job back.”

    Delay’s not worried. When the time comes to step back into action, he’ll just get Abramoff’s buddy Adam Kidan to put out a contract on Blunt. These mobster wanna-be’s know how to protect their turf. Tom’s got plenty of experience as an exterminator. It’ll be on pay per view. The Bug-man vs. The Roach.

  • “I don’t care about Dreier’s personal life…”.

    Why the hell not? The GOP has foully persecuted gays for how many elections? Yet they entrust significant power and prestige to an (alleged) homosexual. I submit your attitude about that fact- if indeed that’s what it is- to be misplaced. It would be provide a platform to raise eminently fair and legitimate questions, that would serve to force the GOP to defend the indefensible.

  • force majure,

    Perhaps Dems don’t need that rule. On the other hand, we’ve got inditements against the House majority leadership, ongoing investigations into the Senate Majority leader, and another investigation in the Executive Branch, where someone in the WH betrayed a CIA undercover agent. There are also open investigations on multiple fronts into the dealings of a prominent R lobbist, Jack Abramoff.

    As much as you appear to hate Clinton, the country did have a pretty long period of peace and prosperity under his watch.

    However, we currently are faced with war, disaster, and impending financial ruin under these guys. Perhaps a little perspective will help you understand.

  • force majure, hate to dissapoint you… I don’t know when the rule was enacted, but it was some time before 1993 that the Democrats in the house enacted a rule for their caucus stating that committee chairs would have to step down if indicted. After that, in 1993, the Republicans enacted their current rule, which covered ANY leadership position, in order to appear more ethical and responsible (I’ll justify the word “appear” in a moment.). Near the end of the 108th Congress, in response to seeing DeLay slowly sinking into the hot water, the Democrats toughened their own rule to match that of the Republican caucus.

    The very first time the Republicans felt that DeLay was even threatened, they attempted to repeal their rule, leaving no doubt that the appearance of propriety mattered more than its actuality. Unsurprising, since this has been a theme that’s been strong and consistent almost from the starting gavel of the 104th Congress.

    Short form? Neither party is clean, but I’d much rather be guilty of what Clinton did than what Bush has done and is doing, any day of the week. Before 1993, when the GOP “got religion” to just enough of a depth to satisfy appearances, they had no such rule at all, and the very first time they thought that rule might have to be enforced, they changed it (and only changed it back because most of the country screamed bloody murder).

  • Oh Yes..I can only think of one way to sum up this
    Blog Resource Information site….wait for it…..”So Cool”
    What’s interesting to me is the more I read the more
    I find this blog helpful, but thats only
    my opinion. Each to there own thing I say…..

  • Comments are closed.