Libby drops appeal — and gives the White House a chance to divulge?

He may already have a get-out-of-jail-free card in hand, but Scooter Libby has been trying to overturn his felony convictions anyway. Something about trying to clear his “good name,” as if that were still a possibility.

This morning, Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff gave up and ended his legal ordeal.

Former White House aide I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby is no longer appealing his conviction in the CIA leak case, a tacit recognition that continuing his legal fight might only make things worse.

Libby, the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, was convicted of perjury and obstruction but President Bush commuted his 30-month prison sentence in July. Had Libby won a new trial, that commutation would be meaningless and Libby would again face potential prison time.

“We remain firmly convinced of Mr. Libby’s innocence,” attorney Theodore Wells said Monday. “However, the realities were, that after five years of government service by Mr. Libby and several years of defending against this case, the burden on Mr. Libby and his young family of continuing to pursue his complete vindication are too great to ask them to bear.”

That’s what attorneys are paid to say, of course, but the reality is Libby didn’t have much of an incentive to keep this charade going. The appeals process would cost him a fortune in legal fees, his chances of success were exceedingly small, the Republican establishment doesn’t seem to mind the fact that he’s a convicted felon, and the president has already shielded him from jail time.

Indeed, Libby actually faced a risk by appealing this conviction and seeking a new trial — if successful, he could get convicted again … under a Democratic president.

As for the politics of today’s announcement, if Libby’s done appealing, then the White House should be done stonewalling.

At various points in recent years, the Bush gang has used the legal proceedings to avoid responding to questions about this scandal.

Before Libby was charged, White House officials said, “We’d love to talk about leaking the name of a covert CIA official during a time of war to spite her husband, but darn it, there’s an ongoing criminal investigation. Check back later.”

After Libby was charged, those same officials said, “Well, sure, it’d be great if we could talk about all of this, but there’s an ongoing trial, and White House officials might be called as witnesses. Check back later.”

After Libby was convicted and his sentence was commuted, they said, “Of course, we’d like nothing more than to answer questions, but there’s still a civil suit pending in the courts.”

After the civil suit was thrown out of court, the Bush gang said, “Golly gee, we’re almost there, but we still can’t answer questions because Libby’s criminal conviction is still under appeal.”

And now, they are out of excuses. Libby’s case is done. Patrick Fitzgerald is done. The civil suit is done. Indeed, Paul Kiel dug up a White House press briefing from July at which point the president’s spokesperson said the president and his aides would “deal with” questions after the appeals process was complete.

Q: Tony, one point that is not in dispute is that Karl Rove was involved in the leak, in some way he was involved. He talked to at least two reporters who ended up publishing this information. In 2004, the President said — he didn’t talk about convictions or anything — he said he would fire anyone in this White House who was involved in the leak. We now know Karl Rove was involved; he did not fire him.

SNOW: There are two things to note. We have also said that we do not — we are not going to make comments in detail until the legal process is over. And it is not; there is still an appeal through…. I believe that the Libby team, at this point, still has before the court an appeal. […]

Q How does this square with the President saying, anybody who leaks in my White House, anybody who doesn’t follow the law, is not going to work for me?

SNOW: Well, once we get — once we get final determination on that, we’ll deal with it.

We have “final determination” as of today. I don’t know whether the White House press corps is still prepared to push for an explanation of what transpired inside the West Wing, but as of this afternoon, the Bush gang is officially out of excuses for years of stonewalling.

I’m sure they will try to switch quickly to a new tune: “We’ve already said everything that we are going to say on that. It’s old business – let’s move on.”

  • The ethos of the news machine requires them to declare when they have conflicts between the corporate boss and the subject, and they always tell us when they don’t identify a source with “spoke only on condition of anonymity” (as if that tells us anything), so why not a caveat whenever any shyster is quoted on any case at any time?

    Warning: Following is a shyster quote, which should be treated exactly like your used coffee grounds.

    I remember so long ago when Agnew’s shyster was assuring us of the usual: “My perp is utterly innocent, he has been cooperating fully with the investigation, and he looks forward to a fair trial, at which he will be fully exonerated.”

    At the same time he was delivering this bilge, he was negotiating with prosecutors to cop his client to a no lo contendre, after which of course we received the standard, “I only copped the plea to save this great land I love from the heartbreak of a long and divisive trial.”

    Why even quote shyters at all? They never tell us anything; they only try and sell us a bill of goods.

  • “…as of this afternoon, the Bush gang is officially out of excuses for years of stonewalling.”

    Hmmm. Just because WE can’t think of another excuse, doesn’t mean they’ve really ran out of them.

  • Well, the WH gang can’t keep hiding that bag of shit they’ve been protecting all these years. You know that bag of shit that has deception, duplicity and treason in it. You know, that bag that has been giving off that offensive odor of political crap. You know, that bag that has a stinky, fetid amorality to it. -Kevo

  • Since their new legal rationale for the obstruction of justice is the avoidance of anything that might make you look bad on YouTube, they will simply say: “We can’t tell you who helped Libby burn a CIA agent, because we have burned all the records and deleted all the emails, and destroyed all the backup copies of the emails. We then destroyed all the home computers of all whitehouse employees, and everyone who ever backed up their files was (if necessary) waterboarded until they told us where all the copies were. This was done because if al Qaeda ever got ahold of this information they might be able to go after Ms Plame’s family like we did.”

  • They ought to just come clean and say something cheerfully truthful like this:

    “No comment now, no comment ever. It is none of your business. It never was any of your business. The president does what he wants when he wants to keep the country safe. He is the president. If you don’t like it… why don’t you move your liberal media ass to Cuba?”

    These guys are scofflaws.
    They’ve been telling the American public to go “cheney” themselves for years.
    They ought to just come out and be honest about it.
    No one will mind.
    At least not the timid and tame American people…

  • Scooter’s attorney makes it sound like ol’ Scoot had to pony up the cash for his defense, or something. I seem to recall that donations by his scary-nutty conservative moneybags pals covered the tab for his defense quite neatly, even leaving some over for a coke for the designated driver. I don’t doubt those same sources would snap open their wallets once again to pay the fee for having him exonerated. Wish I’d had friends like that when I was going through my last divorce.

  • Comments are closed.